AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core 7 251E Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and the Intel Core 7 251E occupy different corners of the processor market, and the recorded data reflects that divergence clearly. The AMD part is a mobile processor aimed at thin-and-light laptops, while the Intel part is a desktop processor with a much higher core count. The most striking difference in the database is that the Ryzen 5 7533HS has a full set of benchmark results, while the Core 7 251E has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This means the analysis must rely on the architectural specifications and the performance data of the AMD chip, interpreted against its nearest rivals, to understand where each processor stands.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no direct head-to-head benchmark entries comparing the two processors in the database. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark test suites, whereas the Core 7 251E has zero benchmark entries. This absence of data for the Intel chip makes a direct numerical comparison impossible. However, the Ryzen 5 7533HS’s scores can be analyzed against its nearest rivals to establish its performance class.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 12342 points. In single-core, it scores 1742 points. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score is 5183 and the single-core score is 731. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 1243 and the single-core score is 175. These results indicate a processor that delivers solid multi-threaded performance for a 35-watt mobile part, with the multi-core scores roughly seven times higher than the single-core scores in each Cinebench version.

Passmark results for the Ryzen 5 7533HS show an average benchmark score of 19364, placing it in the 73rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, which has an average score of 19368, a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core i5-1345U scores 19411, which is 0.2 percent higher. The Intel Core i7-8700K scores 19238, which is 0.7 percent lower. The Intel Core i7-10700F scores 19499, which is 0.7 percent higher. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, showing that the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits in a highly competitive performance band. The data shows that the AMD chip is essentially on par with the Core Ultra 5 226V, marginally behind the i5-1345U and i7-10700F, and marginally ahead of the i7-8700K.

Looking at individual Passmark workloads, the Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 168692 in data compression, 10718 in data encryption, 11219 in extended instructions, 48 in find prime numbers, 27800 in floating point math, 50800 in integer math, 14520 in multithread, 821 in physics, 17669 in random string sorting, and 2740 in single thread. The multithread score of 14520 confirms that the six-core, twelve-thread configuration scales well, while the single-thread score of 2740 shows moderate per-core performance. The floating point math score of 27800 is about 55 percent of the integer math score of 50800, indicating that integer workloads are the stronger suit for this chip.

Since the Core 7 251E has no benchmarks, the only head-to-head conclusion that can be drawn from the data is that the Ryzen 5 7533HS has measurable performance results, while the Intel part does not. The database records no wins for either processor in head-to-head tests, because no such tests exist.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture, codenamed Rembrandt-R, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 208 mm². It has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 7 251E uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². It has 24 cores and 32 threads. The Intel part has no architecture name listed in the database, only the codename Bartlett Lake.

The manufacturing process differs significantly: the AMD chip uses 6 nm TSMC silicon, while the Intel chip uses 10 nm Intel silicon. The AMD die is 49 mm² smaller than the Intel die, which is a 19 percent difference in physical size. The core counts diverge sharply: the Intel part has four times as many cores and 2.67 times as many threads as the AMD part.

Cache hierarchy also differs. The AMD chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel L2 cache is four times larger per core, and the L3 cache is 2.25 times larger overall. The Intel chip’s total L2 cache, when multiplied across 24 cores, reaches 48 MB, which is substantially more than the AMD chip’s 3 MB total L2 across six cores.

Memory support is another divider. The AMD chip supports only DDR5 memory, with dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also dual-channel, with a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, a 17 percent advantage. The Intel chip also supports ECC memory, while the AMD chip does not.

PCI Express generation differs as well. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Intel part has fewer lanes but a newer generation, offering higher bandwidth per lane. Integrated graphics are present on both: the AMD chip uses Radeon 660M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770.

The AMD chip is a mobile processor with a 35-watt TDP, while the Intel chip is a desktop processor with a 65-watt TDP. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has 24 cores and 32 threads. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel chip offers four times the core count and 2.67 times the thread count.

Q: What are the clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Intel Core 7 251E has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The Intel chip has a lower base clock but a significantly higher boost clock.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 251E is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip uses a smaller process node.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel chip has a 17 percent higher memory bandwidth.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores recorded for the Intel Core 7 251E?

A: No. The database contains no benchmark entries for the Intel Core 7 251E. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 17 benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests.

Q: What is the release date for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS was released on 2024-08-31. The Intel Core 7 251E was released on 2025-01-12. The Intel chip is newer by several months.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two processors:

• Cores: AMD has 6 cores, Intel has 24 cores.
• Threads: AMD has 12 threads, Intel has 32 threads.
• Base Clock: AMD is 3.30 GHz, Intel is 2.10 GHz.
• Boost Clock: AMD is 4.40 GHz, Intel is 5.60 GHz.
• TDP: AMD is 35 watts, Intel is 65 watts.
• Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP7, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.
• Architecture: AMD uses Zen 3+, Intel has no listed architecture.
• Codename: AMD is Rembrandt-R, Intel is Bartlett Lake.
• Process Node: AMD is 6 nm, Intel is 10 nm.
• Foundry: AMD uses TSMC, Intel uses Intel.
• Die Size: AMD is 208 mm², Intel is 257 mm².
• L1 Cache: AMD is 64 KB per core, Intel is 80 KB per core.
• L2 Cache: AMD is 512 KB per core, Intel is 2 MB per core.
• L3 Cache: AMD is 16 MB shared, Intel is 36 MB shared.
• Memory Support: AMD supports DDR5 only, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory Bandwidth: AMD is 76.8 GB/s, Intel is 89.6 GB/s.
• ECC Memory: AMD does not support it, Intel supports it.
• PCIe: AMD is Gen 4 with 20 lanes, Intel is Gen 5 with 16 lanes.
• Integrated Graphics: AMD has Radeon 660M, Intel has UHD Graphics 770.
• Market Segment: AMD is Mobile, Intel is Desktop.
• Release Date: AMD is 2024-08-31, Intel is 2025-01-12.
• Part Number: AMD is 100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2), Intel is SRQDUQ657.

The AMD chip also has a launch MSRP of $384 for the Intel part only. The AMD chip has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

The Verdict

The data shows two processors built for entirely different purposes. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is a mobile chip with a 35-watt TDP, six cores, and a 6 nm process. It has a complete set of benchmark results confirming its position in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19364. The Intel Core 7 251E is a desktop chip with a 65-watt TDP, 24 cores, and a 10 nm process. It has no benchmark scores in the database, so its actual performance cannot be verified from recorded data.

The AMD chip’s performance is closely matched to four rival Intel processors, all within 0.7 percent of its average score. This indicates that the Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers competitive performance for its mobile class, sitting alongside the Core Ultra 5 226V and i5-1345U in the same performance band. The Intel Core 7 251E, with its much higher core count and boost clock of 5.60 GHz, is theoretically positioned for heavy multi-threaded desktop workloads, but the database does not provide scores to confirm this.

A buyer choosing between these two must consider that the Ryzen 5 7533HS is a proven performer with measured results, while the Core 7 251E is an untested part in the database. The Intel chip has a higher memory bandwidth, supports ECC memory, and offers four times the cores, but none of that is quantified in benchmark terms. The AMD chip has a smaller process node, lower TDP, and a higher base clock. For users who prioritize verified performance data, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only one with evidence in the database. For users who prioritize raw specifications, the Core 7 251E has the higher core count and newer PCIe generation.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS wins on the basis of measured performance. The database contains 17 benchmark scores for this chip, covering Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple Passmark workloads. Its average benchmark score of 19364 places it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are all within one percentage point of its score. The 12342-point Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 1742-point single-core score provide concrete evidence of its capabilities. The chip also wins on process technology, using a 6 nm TSMC node versus the Intel 10 nm node, which typically translates to better power efficiency. Its 35-watt TDP is nearly half the Intel chip’s 65-watt TDP, making it the clear choice for mobile or power-constrained systems.

Intel Core 7 251E wins on raw specification headroom. The chip has 24 cores and 32 threads, which is four times the core count and 2.67 times the thread count of the AMD chip. Its boost clock of 5.60 GHz is 27 percent higher than the AMD chip’s 4.40 GHz boost. The L3 cache is 36 MB versus 16 MB, and the L2 cache is 2 MB per core versus 512 KB per core. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD chip supports only DDR5. The Intel chip has a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory, which the AMD chip does not. The Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Intel chip also has a newer release date of 2025-01-12 compared to 2024-08-31.

The application split is clear from the data. The Ryzen 5 7533HS is designed for mobile devices with its FP7 socket, 35-watt TDP, and Radeon 660M integrated graphics. The Core 7 251E is designed for desktop systems with its Socket 1700, 65-watt TDP, and UHD Graphics 770. The AMD chip’s benchmark results confirm its performance in real workloads, making it the choice for anyone who needs verified numbers. The Intel chip’s specifications suggest it is built for multi-threaded desktop tasks like rendering or compilation, but the absence of benchmarks means its actual performance remains unverified in the database. For a system builder who relies on recorded data, the AMD chip is the safer pick. For a builder who trusts core count and clock speed as predictors, the Intel chip offers more headroom on paper.