AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS and Intel Core 3 201TE occupy different corners of the processor market, and the recorded data reflects that separation. The Ryzen 5 7533HS is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor built on AMD’s Zen 3+ architecture, while the Core 3 201TE is a 4-core, 8-thread desktop chip based on Intel’s Bartlett Lake design. The benchmark database contains a full suite of scores for the AMD part, but the Intel processor has no recorded benchmark results, which shapes the analysis. What follows is a breakdown of where each chip wins based on the available data, their architectural differences, and what the numbers imply for different workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a clear advantage in every measurable performance category because it is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark scores. Its 6 cores and 12 threads give it a structural edge in multi-threaded workloads, and the data confirms this. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12342 places it well above typical 4-core parts, and the PassMark multithread score of 14520 reinforces that strength. For rendering, video encoding, and other parallel tasks, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is the obvious choice.

The Intel Core 3 201TE, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50, which is the median by definition but not based on any measured performance. This means the Intel chip cannot be declared a winner in any recorded workload, but its specifications suggest where it might compete. It boosts to 4.60 GHz, which is higher than the Ryzen’s 4.40 GHz, so in lightly threaded tasks that rely on raw clock speed, the Core 3 201TE could hold its own. However, without benchmark data, that remains speculative.

The use-case split is therefore stark: the Ryzen 5 7533HS wins every recorded benchmark, while the Core 3 201TE wins no recorded benchmark. The Intel part does offer ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which are features aimed at specific professional or server-like use cases, but those are not performance wins in the traditional sense. The data shows a mobile processor that dominates the measurable metrics and a desktop processor that brings platform-level features but no measured speed.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 208 mm², which is larger than the Intel part, but the process node is more advanced. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel itself, with a die size of 163 mm². The difference in process node suggests that AMD has a density advantage, though Intel’s smaller die indicates a simpler layout.

Cache configurations differ notably. The Ryzen 5 7533HS has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 3 201TE has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel’s per-core L2 is larger, which can help with certain workloads that fit in that level, but AMD’s larger L3 pool is shared across all six cores. The total cache hierarchy favors AMD in capacity, while Intel has a per-core boost in L2.

Memory support also separates them. The Ryzen 5 7533HS supports only DDR5, while the Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both have dual-channel memory buses and identical theoretical bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is an Intel-only feature here, as the AMD part does not support it. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the Ryzen 5 7533HS has Gen 4 with 20 CPU-only lanes, while the Core 3 201TE has Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. Intel’s newer PCIe standard offers more bandwidth per lane, but AMD has more lanes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no head-to-head benchmark results in the database, which is expected given the Intel part’s empty benchmark array. The comparison must be drawn from the AMD part’s scores and the Intel part’s specifications. The Ryzen 5 7533HS delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12342 and a single-core score of 1742. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5183 multicore and 731 single-core. Cinebench R15 shows 1243 multicore and 175 single-core. These numbers establish a solid baseline for a 6-core mobile chip.

The PassMark suite adds more detail. The Ryzen 5 7533HS scores 50800 in integer math, 27800 in floating-point math, 11219 in extended instructions, and 168692 in data compression. Data encryption hits 10718, and random string sorting reaches 17669. The single-thread score is 2740, and the multithread score is 14520. Physics and prime number tests are lower at 821 and 48 respectively, which reflects the nature of those specific workloads. The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 19364, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 73, placing it above the majority of processors in the database.

For the Intel Core 3 201TE, there is nothing to compare directly. Its 4 cores and 8 threads suggest it would trail the Ryzen in multicore tests, but its 4.60 GHz boost clock could give it a single-thread edge. The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 5 7533HS are Intel Core Ultra 5 226V with an average score of 19368 (0 percent delta), Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411 (-0.2 percent), Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238 (0.7 percent), and Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499 (-0.7 percent). These deltas are all within one percent, meaning the Ryzen 5 7533HS sits in a tight performance cluster with those parts. The Core 3 201TE has no rivals listed, reinforcing its lack of measured data.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Core 3 201TE has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads. This gives AMD a 50 percent advantage in core count and thread count.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Intel has a higher boost by 0.20 GHz, but AMD has a higher base clock by 0.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not. This is a differentiating feature for the Intel part in certain professional or reliability-focused scenarios.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7533HS has an average benchmark score of 19364. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19368 (0 percent delta), Intel Core i5-1345U at 19411 (-0.2 percent), Intel Core i7-8700K at 19238 (0.7 percent), and Intel Core i7-10700F at 19499 (-0.7 percent). All deltas are within one percent.

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS uses a 6 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel. AMD’s node is more advanced, which typically allows for better power efficiency and density.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS | Intel Core 3 201TE |

|----------------|---------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.40 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Not specified |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 208 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 12 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Launch MSRP | Not available | $134 |

The Verdict

The data directs a clear conclusion for different buyers. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only one of the two with any measured performance, and its scores place it in the 73rd percentile of all CPUs. It doubles the core count of the Intel part and offers a higher base clock, a more advanced 6 nm process, and a larger L3 cache. For anyone running multi-threaded workloads such as rendering, compilation, or data processing, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only option with recorded evidence of capability. Its nearest rivals, all within one percent in average score, confirm it is a competitive mobile processor.

The Intel Core 3 201TE presents a different profile. It has no benchmark data, so its performance cannot be verified from the database. Its strengths are platform-level: ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and a higher boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which offers flexibility in system design. The launch MSRP is $134, but that is a list price, not a performance metric. For a desktop user who needs ECC or the latest PCIe standard and does not rely on heavy multi-threading, the Core 3 201TE has a spec-based argument. For measured performance, the Ryzen 5 7533HS is the only contender. The verdict hinges on whether the buyer prioritizes recorded speed or platform features, and the data supports the AMD chip in the former and the Intel chip in the latter.