AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and the Intel Core i7-14700T are positioned very differently in the database, with the Intel chip holding a decisive advantage in the recorded benchmarks. The Core i7-14700T has an average benchmark score of 41914, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no recorded benchmark scores, resulting in a 0 average. This makes direct numerical comparison impossible for most tests, but the data available for the Intel part is extensive and paints a clear picture of its performance tier.

The Intel Core i7-14700T sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 sits in the 50th percentile. This percentile gap is significant, as it indicates that the Intel processor outperforms a much larger share of the CPU landscape. The Intel chip’s nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS with an average score of 41963 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i7-12850HX with an average score of 41779 (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 with an average score of 42055 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core 7 251TE with an average score of 41650 (0.6% lower). The Core i7-14700T’s score of 41914 places it within a tight performance cluster, effectively trading blows with these rivals within a 0.6% margin.

Looking at the specific benchmark results for the Intel Core i7-14700T, the strongest showings come in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 25980, and in Cinebench R20 multi-core, it scores 10911. The PassMark multi-thread test shows 30571, while integer math reaches 113854 and floating-point math reaches 79042. Data compression performance is particularly strong at 354216. These numbers indicate a processor that handles heavily parallel workloads with substantial capacity, a direct result of its 20 cores and 28 threads.

Single-thread performance for the Intel chip is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3667 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3905. The extended instructions score of 20052 and data encryption score of 21277 round out a balanced profile. The physics test scores 1946, and random string sorting hits 38546. The find prime numbers test scores 145, which is the lowest individual result but remains a valid datapoint for that specific workload.

Since the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no benchmark entries in the database, there are no wins for either side to tally. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the wins counter shows 0 for both processors. This absence of data means the analysis must rely on architectural and specification differences to infer relative strengths. The Intel part is fully characterized, while the AMD part is not, which itself is a notable finding for database users seeking comparable metrics.

The Intel Core i7-14700T’s percentile ranking of 88 confirms its position as a high-end desktop processor. Its nearest rivals, all within a 0.6% delta, show that it competes directly with other strong multi-core chips. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485’s 50th percentile, in contrast, suggests that if it were benchmarked, it would likely land in the middle of the pack based on its core configuration and mobile segment placement, though no recorded data supports this directly. The database shows a clear quantitative gap in available performance evidence, favoring the Intel part for any user relying on measured results.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has an average benchmark score of 41914, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has an average benchmark score of 0 because no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How do the core counts compare between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 32 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 supports LPDDR5X memory.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i7-14700T uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divergence between the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and the Intel Core i7-14700T is fundamental. The AMD part is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Halo, and uses a 4 nm process node manufactured by TSMC. The Intel part is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. This process gap is substantial, with the AMD chip using a notably more advanced node, which typically enables higher transistor density and improved power efficiency.

The die size difference is stark. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has a die size of 70.6 mm², while the Intel Core i7-14700T has a die size of 257 mm². This nearly 4x difference reflects the distinct design philosophies: the AMD chip is a compact mobile processor, while the Intel chip is a larger desktop part with many more cores. The Intel chip’s larger die accommodates its 20 cores and 28 threads, compared to the AMD chip’s 8 cores and 16 threads.

Cache hierarchies also differ in structure. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but L2 cache differs: the AMD chip has 1 MB per core, while the Intel chip has 2 MB per core. L3 cache is similar, with the AMD chip offering 32 MB shared and the Intel chip offering 33 MB shared. The Intel chip’s larger per-core L2 cache may benefit workloads that repeatedly access a working set within that cache level.

Memory architecture is another key differentiator. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel Core i7-14700T supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded in the database. The AMD chip’s quad-channel LPDDR5X configuration provides a clear bandwidth advantage for memory-intensive tasks, though the Intel chip’s dual-channel setup is standard for desktop platforms.

PCIe support differs as well. The AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip’s support for PCIe Gen 5 offers double the bandwidth per lane for compatible devices, which matters for high-speed storage and graphics expansion.

Integrated graphics also distinguish the two. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 includes the Radeon 8050S, while the Intel Core i7-14700T includes UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part’s Radeon 8050S is part of a mobile-focused design, while Intel’s UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop integrated solution.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database. Core count: the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 8 cores, while the Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores. Thread count: 16 versus 28. Base clock: 3.60 GHz for the AMD chip, 1.30 GHz for the Intel chip. Boost clock: 5.00 GHz for the AMD chip, 5.20 GHz for the Intel chip. TDP: 55 for the AMD chip, 35 for the Intel chip. The AMD chip’s higher base clock and TDP contrast with the Intel chip’s higher boost clock and lower TDP.

Socket types are completely different: the AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. Process node: 4 nm TSMC versus 10 nm Intel. Die size: 70.6 mm² versus 257 mm². L2 cache: 1 MB per core versus 2 MB per core. L3 cache: 32 MB shared versus 33 MB shared. Memory support: LPDDR5X versus DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bus: quad-channel versus dual-channel. Memory bandwidth: 273.1 GB/s versus not recorded. PCIe: Gen 4 with 16 lanes versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: Radeon 8050S versus UHD Graphics 770.

Market segment: the AMD chip is mobile, while the Intel chip is desktop. Release date: the AMD chip was released on 2026-05-19, while the Intel chip was released on 2024-01-07. Part numbers: 100-000002144 for the AMD chip, SRN41 for the Intel chip. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD chip has no launch MSRP recorded. Both processors have ECC memory support enabled, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14700T wins in every measurable benchmark category because the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 lacks any benchmark scores in the database. The Intel chip’s 20 cores and 28 threads give it a clear advantage in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25980 and PassMark multi-thread score of 30571. For users running video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the Intel chip’s recorded results show strong parallel processing capability.

The Intel chip also wins on single-thread performance based on its recorded scores, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3667 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3905. Its boost clock of 5.20 GHz, higher than the AMD chip’s 5.00 GHz, supports these results. For everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications, the Intel chip’s measured performance is the only data-backed option.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 wins on architectural efficiency based on specifications, though not on measured benchmarks. Its 4 nm process node from TSMC, compared to Intel’s 10 nm node, indicates a more modern manufacturing process. Its quad-channel LPDDR5X memory with 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth far exceeds the Intel chip’s dual-channel setup, which has no recorded bandwidth figure. For memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads, the AMD chip’s specification sheet suggests a potential advantage, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The AMD chip’s higher base clock of 3.60 GHz versus 1.30 GHz suggests better sustained performance at lower loads, but its TDP of 55 exceeds the Intel chip’s 35 TDP. The Intel chip’s lower TDP makes it attractive for power-constrained desktop builds, while the AMD chip’s mobile segment designation indicates it is designed for laptops and compact systems. The AMD chip’s release date of 2026-05-19 is later than the Intel chip’s 2024-01-07, making it a newer design.

The Verdict

The database presents a clear verdict for users who rely on measured performance: the Intel Core i7-14700T is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark results, and those results place it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 41914 puts it in the same performance class as the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, Intel Core i7-12850HX, AMD Ryzen 5 7400, and Intel Core 7 251TE, all within a 0.6% delta. Users seeking a processor with proven multi-threaded and single-threaded performance should choose the Intel chip, which delivers 25980 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3667 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485, with no benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking, cannot be recommended on the basis of measured data. Its specifications, however, indicate a modern mobile design with a 4 nm process, quad-channel LPDDR5X memory at 273.1 GB/s, and a compact 70.6 mm² die. These features may appeal to users building power-efficient mobile systems, but the absence of benchmark data means its real-world performance is unverified in the database.

For desktop users with workloads that demand high core counts, the Intel Core i7-14700T is the data-backed choice. Its 20 cores, 28 threads, and 33 MB of L3 cache support heavy parallel workloads, and its PCIe Gen 5 support enables fast expansion. The Intel chip’s launch MSRP of $384 provides a fixed reference point for cost, though the database does not compare this to the AMD chip’s pricing.

For mobile users prioritizing memory bandwidth and process efficiency, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 offers a compelling specification sheet, but the lack of benchmarks leaves its performance unconfirmed. The Intel chip’s recorded results and higher percentile ranking make it the safer selection for any user who requires validated performance data. The verdict from the database is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-14700T is the proven performer, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 remains an unmeasured quantity.