AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485

CORE STATE Gorgon Halo
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 32 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 55W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Halo
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14701TE

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
1,716
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
242
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
7,154
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,010
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
17,035
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
2,405
passmark_data_compression
N/A
220,520
passmark_data_encryption
N/A
11,699
passmark_extended_instructions
N/A
14,354
passmark_find_prime_numbers
N/A
143
passmark_floating_point_math
N/A
50,219
passmark_integer_math
N/A
65,792
passmark_multithread
N/A
20,042
passmark_physics
N/A
1,860
passmark_random_string_sorting
N/A
22,760
passmark_single_thread
N/A
2,637
passmark_singlethread
N/A
2,637

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Core i7-14701TE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data for this comparison comes entirely from the Intel Core i7-14701TE, as the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 currently has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Intel part's average benchmark score is 26,013, placing it at the 78th percentile of all CPUs tracked. This means the comparison is one-sided: the Intel processor has a full suite of measured results, while the AMD processor's performance profile remains uncharacterized.

The Core i7-14701TE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,035 and a single-core score of 2,405. In Cinebench R20, it records 7,154 multi-core and 1,010 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 1,716 multi-core and 242 single-core. These results indicate a processor that scales well from lightly threaded workloads up to fully loaded multi-threaded tasks.

PassMark results further characterize the Intel chip. The multi-thread score is 20,042, while single-thread performance registers at 2,637. Integer math scores 65,792, floating point math scores 50,219, and extended instructions (SIMD) scores 14,354. Data compression reaches 220,520, data encryption reaches 11,699, and random string sorting completes at 22,760. Physics simulation scores 1,860, and prime number finding scores 143.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head section cannot show any wins for the AMD side. The data confirms a complete absence of measured performance for the AMD part. The Intel Core i7-14701TE, by contrast, has 17 recorded benchmark scores across both Cinebench and PassMark suites.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14701TE, based on average benchmark score, are all AMD processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 scores 25,981, a 0.1% difference from the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS scores 26,106, which is 0.4% lower than the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE scores 25,880, a 0.5% difference. The AMD Ryzen 5 8540U scores 26,187, 0.7% lower than the Intel processor. These four rivals bracket the Intel part within a narrow performance band, with the Intel chip sitting slightly ahead of three of them and slightly behind one.

The narrow delta percentages suggest that the Core i7-14701TE sits in a tightly contested performance tier. It is effectively level with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE, while holding a small but measurable edge over the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U. The 78th percentile ranking relative to all CPUs confirms that this is a solidly above-average performer in the broader database.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one side of this comparison. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has a complete set of benchmark results, an average score of 26,013, and a 78th percentile ranking. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects its unmeasured status rather than any actual performance data.

For users selecting between these two processors, the database currently provides no measured evidence for the AMD part. The Intel processor's results show a capable multi-threaded performer: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 17,035 and PassMark multi-thread at 20,042 are the headline numbers. The single-thread results, 2,405 in Cinebench R23 and 2,637 in PassMark, indicate solid lightly threaded performance as well.

The Intel part's nearest rivals, all AMD processors, fall within a 1.2 percentage point window of its average score. This positioning suggests that the Core i7-14701TE competes directly with mid-range AMD mobile and desktop parts, and the data shows it holding its own against each of them. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 cannot be placed in this competitive context until benchmark results are recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14701TE wins in every measurable category because it is the only part with recorded data. It shows strengths across both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 results demonstrate balanced scaling: the multi-core score of 17,035 is roughly seven times the single-core score of 2,405, which is typical for an 8-core, 16-thread processor.

PassMark results break down the Intel part's character further. The integer math score of 65,792 exceeds the floating point score of 50,219, indicating that the processor handles integer-heavy workloads slightly better than floating point operations. The data compression score of 220,520 is the highest single result in the PassMark suite, suggesting strong performance in data-dense workloads. The extended instructions score of 14,354 shows competent SIMD throughput.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no wins in the recorded data. Its specifications indicate a different design: 8 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 3.60 GHz, a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, a 55 W TDP, and a 4 nm TSMC process node. The Intel part uses 8 cores and 16 threads as well, with a 2.10 GHz base clock and a 5.20 GHz boost clock, fitted in a 45 W TDP. The Intel chip's higher boost clock and lower TDP are notable, but no benchmark evidence exists to translate the AMD part's specifications into performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has an average benchmark score of 26,013. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has an average benchmark score of 0 because no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14701TE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel part's closest competitors are the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (0.1% higher score), the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS (0.4% lower), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (0.7% lower).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for both processors?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and the Intel Core i7-14701TE have 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the highest recorded benchmark score for the Intel processor?

A: The data compression test in PassMark produced the highest score at 220,520. The next highest is the integer math score of 65,792.

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses a 4 nm TSMC process node. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses a 10 nm Intel process node.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and the Intel Core i7-14701TE have ECC memory support enabled in their specifications.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in architecture despite sharing the same core and thread counts. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 is based on the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation built on Zen 5. It uses a 4 nm TSMC process node with a die size of 70.6 mm². The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen family. It is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The AMD die is roughly 3.6 times smaller in area than the Intel die.

Cache layouts differ as well. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 32 MB of shared L3 cache in the AMD part versus 33 MB in the Intel part. The L2 cache differs: the AMD processor has 1 MB per core, while the Intel processor has 2 MB per core. This gives the Intel part a total L2 capacity advantage, though the L3 difference is only 1 MB in Intel's favor.

Memory support creates a clear separation. The AMD processor supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded. The AMD part's quad-channel memory configuration offers substantially higher theoretical bandwidth, which can benefit integrated graphics and memory-intensive workloads.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor's newer PCIe generation provides higher per-lane bandwidth for expansion devices, though the AMD part's memory bandwidth advantage may offset this in certain workloads.

Integrated graphics are another differentiator. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 includes a Radeon 8050S iGPU. The Intel Core i7-14701TE includes UHD Graphics 770. No benchmark scores are recorded for either integrated GPU.

The AMD part is a mobile-market processor on AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel part is a desktop-market processor on Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor has a 55 W TDP, a 3.60 GHz base clock, and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The Intel processor has a 45 W TDP, a 2.10 GHz base clock, and a 5.20 GHz boost clock. The Intel part boosts higher but runs at a much lower base clock. The AMD part's release date is recorded as May 19, 2026, while the Intel part's release date is June 30, 2024.

Both processors support ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part carries part number 100-000002144, and the Intel part carries part number Q49GSRNJL. The Intel part's production status is Active, and the AMD part's production status is also Active. The AMD processor's market segment is Mobile, while the Intel processor's market segment is Desktop.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI Max PRO 485
i7-14701TE
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.6
2.1 -41.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.6
2.1 -41.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Multiplier
36
21 -41.7%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
32 MB (shared)
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
55
45 -18.2%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
115 W
Configurable TDP
45-120 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
—
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Halo
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI Max PRO (Zen 5)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
70.6 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Quad-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
273.1 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP11
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
P-Core Turbo
—
5.2 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 8050S
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000002144
Q49GSRNJL
Package
FC-BGA
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 Details View Core i7-14701TE Details