AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head comparison results between the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and the Intel Core i5-14400T. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors are zero. This means there are no recorded side-by-side test scores where both CPUs executed the identical workload under the same testing conditions within the database.

However, the database does include a full benchmark suite for the Intel Core i5-14400T, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The Intel part's benchmark results therefore stand as the only quantitative performance data available for this comparison. The Core i5-14400T records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17189, a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2426, a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7219, and a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1018. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1732 multi-core and 244 single-core.

The Intel processor also delivers a substantial suite of PassMark results. Its PassMark multithread score is 20223, and its PassMark single-thread score is 3512. In integer math, it reaches 65667, while floating point math yields 49139. Data compression scores 235636, data encryption scores 13244, and extended instructions score 14562. The random string sorting test produces 25181, physics processing records 1244, and the find prime numbers test returns 73.

Since the AMD processor has no benchmark entries in the database, there are no exact numeric deltas to report between the two units. The database's average benchmark score for the Intel part is 27166, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 79. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has a percentile versus all CPUs of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting the absence of recorded measurements.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-14400T provide context for its standing. The Intel Core i9-9900K has an average score of 27097, which is 0.3 percent lower than the i5-14400T. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051, also 0.3 percent lower. The Intel Core i7-13700H scores 27355, which is 0.7 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G scores 27382, 0.8 percent higher. These small deltas place the i5-14400T in a tightly clustered performance band, slightly behind the i7-13700H and Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G, and slightly ahead of the i9-9900K and Ryzen 7 5700G.

Where Each One Wins

For the Intel Core i5-14400T, the recorded benchmark data shows clear strengths in multi-threaded rendering workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17189 is approximately seven times the single-core score of 2426, indicating strong scaling across its 10 cores and 16 threads. The Cinebench R20 multi-core result of 7219 similarly reflects solid parallel performance. The PassMark multithread score of 20223 reinforces this pattern.

The Intel processor also demonstrates efficiency in integer-heavy and compression-based tasks. Its PassMark integer math score of 65667 and data compression score of 235636 are the highest among its recorded PassMark results. Data encryption at 13244 and extended instructions at 14562 show moderate throughput. Single-threaded performance, represented by the PassMark single-thread score of 3512 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2426, is competitive for the processor's class.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no benchmark wins in the database because no benchmark results are recorded for it. The wins counter for the AMD part is zero, and its benchmark array is empty. Consequently, the database cannot assign any workload category victory to the AMD processor. The Intel part holds the only measurable performance data, and therefore all workload-specific strengths in this comparison belong to the Intel Core i5-14400T by default of data availability, not by measured direct comparison.

The use-case split is therefore one-sided in the recorded data. For rendering, the Intel part's Cinebench scores indicate strong multi-core capability. For general productivity, its PassMark integer and compression results show solid throughput. For single-threaded responsiveness, its PassMark and Cinebench single-core scores provide a reference point. The AMD processor's capabilities cannot be quantified from the database, so any workload-based assessment of the AMD part is impossible from recorded measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ substantially in their underlying design. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses the Gorgon Halo codename, belongs to the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation built on Zen 5, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14400T uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, and is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD die size is 70.6 mm², while the Intel die size is 215 mm².

Core and thread counts differ. The AMD processor has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel processor has 10 cores and 16 threads. Both processors have 16 threads, but the Intel part achieves this with two additional physical cores. The base clock of the AMD part is 3.60 GHz, while the Intel part has a base clock of 1.50 GHz. The boost clock of the AMD part is 5.00 GHz, while the Intel part boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Cache hierarchies also differ. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB per core. The AMD processor has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel processor has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part therefore has a larger L3 pool, while the Intel part has slightly more L2 per core.

Memory support diverges sharply. The AMD processor supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, and the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part includes a Radeon 8050S, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 730.

Socket and market segment separate the two further. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP11 and is classified as a mobile part. The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop part. The AMD processor has a TDP of 55, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 35. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221; no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD part. The AMD processor has a release date of 2026-05-19, while the Intel processor has a release date of 2024-01-07. Both are marked as active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s over a quad-channel LPDDR5X bus. The Intel Core i5-14400T supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400T compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has an average benchmark score of 27166. It is 0.3 percent ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K, 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, 0.7 percent behind the Intel Core i7-13700H, and 0.8 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G.

Q: What are the clock speeds of the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14400T has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14400T has 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14400T is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear distinction between the two processors, though the comparison is limited by the absence of benchmark results for the AMD part. The Intel Core i5-14400T has a full set of Cinebench and PassMark scores, an average benchmark score of 27166, and a percentile of 79 versus all CPUs. Its nearest rivals sit within a narrow band: the i9-9900K at 0.3 percent lower, the Ryzen 7 5700G at 0.4 percent lower, the i7-13700H at 0.7 percent higher, and the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G at 0.8 percent higher. This places the Intel part in a competitive mid-range position.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile of 50 versus all CPUs. The database cannot substantiate any performance claim for the AMD processor. Its architectural specifications, including 8 cores, 16 threads, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, 32 MB of L3 cache, and 273.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth, indicate a design aimed at mobile computing with a 55 TDP and integrated Radeon 8050S graphics. However, specifications alone do not produce measured scores.

For users selecting between these two processors based on database measurements, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only part with verified performance data. It delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17189, a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2426, and a PassMark multithread score of 20223. Its desktop socket, PCIe Gen 5 support, and 35 TDP make it a lower-power desktop option with a recorded launch MSRP of $221.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 targets the mobile segment with a higher TDP of 55, a quad-channel LPDDR5X memory interface, and a newer 4 nm process. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock exceeds the Intel part's 4.50 GHz boost clock, and its 32 MB L3 cache exceeds the Intel part's 20 MB. Without benchmark scores, these advantages remain unquantified in the database. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the Intel Core i5-14400T is the measured performer, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 awaits benchmark data to establish its standing.