AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE

The recorded benchmark data pits two very different processor designs against each other: the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, a 6-core, 12-thread mobile part built on TSMC's 4 nm process with Zen 5 architecture, and the Intel Core 5 213PTE, an 8-core, 16-thread desktop processor using Intel's 10 nm process and Bartlett Lake architecture. The AMD part holds a higher overall percentile ranking at 90 versus Intel's 83, yet the Intel chip carries a higher average benchmark score from a different test set, making the head-to-head results essential for understanding where each processor truly delivers. The data shows a split decision: AMD wins 6 of the 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while Intel wins 5, with the margin of victory varying dramatically between tests.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive AMD victory comes in the PassMark extended instructions test, where the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 scores 24,333 against Intel's 16,146, a commanding 50.7% lead. This result indicates a substantial advantage in workloads that leverage advanced CPU instruction sets, likely reflecting the Zen 5 architecture's efficiency in executing complex operations. Data compression also favors AMD, with a score of 293,595 versus 261,083, a 12.5% advantage that suggests stronger throughput when handling compressed data streams.

Single-thread performance is another clear AMD win. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 posts 3,995 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the Core 5 213PTE manages 3,718, giving AMD a 7.5% edge. This result aligns with the AMD part's higher base clock of 3.60 GHz and its 4.90 GHz boost, though the Intel chip boosts to 5.20 GHz. The data indicates that raw clock speed alone does not determine single-thread outcomes, as architectural efficiency plays a larger role in this benchmark. The encryption test is nearly a tie, with AMD edging out Intel by just 0.6% (14,502 versus 14,413), and random string sorting goes to AMD by 3.5% (31,153 versus 30,106).

Intel's largest win is in the PassMark physics test, where it scores 2,199 against AMD's 1,120, a 49.1% advantage. This is a massive gap that suggests the Intel part has significantly stronger computational throughput in physics simulation workloads, likely due to its higher core count and larger shared L3 cache. The find prime numbers test also heavily favors Intel, with a score of 157 versus AMD's 75, a 52.2% deficit for AMD. This result indicates that Intel's architecture handles this specific mathematical workload much more efficiently, despite AMD's higher single-thread score in other tests.

Floating-point math goes to Intel by a 26% margin, with scores of 71,722 versus 53,084, while integer math favors Intel by 14.3% (93,109 versus 79,789). The multithread benchmark shows a narrower Intel lead of 5.3%, with scores of 25,590 versus 24,244. These results paint a picture of Intel dominating in math-heavy and physics-based workloads, while AMD takes the lead in instruction execution, compression, and single-thread tasks. The overall win count of 6 for AMD versus 5 for Intel underscores how closely matched these processors are, with each excelling in distinctly different areas.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is the stronger choice for workloads that depend on instruction-level parallelism and data manipulation. Its 50.7% lead in extended instructions makes it suitable for applications that heavily utilize AVX or similar instruction sets, such as certain scientific computing tasks or multimedia encoding pipelines. The 12.5% advantage in data compression points to benefits in file archiving, database operations, and any task that involves zipping or unzipping large datasets. The 7.5% single-thread lead indicates better responsiveness in lightly threaded applications like typical office productivity, web browsing, and many legacy applications that cannot utilize multiple cores effectively.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE excels in multi-threaded computational workloads. Its 49.1% lead in physics makes it the better option for physics simulations, which are common in engineering analysis and certain scientific research fields. The 52.2% advantage in prime number finding, while niche, suggests strengths in cryptographic or number-theory applications. The 26% lead in floating-point math makes Intel preferable for scientific computing, 3D rendering, and any workload that involves extensive decimal calculations, while the 14.3% edge in integer math supports general computational tasks like video encoding or database query processing. The 5.3% multithread win reinforces that Intel handles parallel workloads better overall, despite having fewer wins in the specific benchmark set.

For mixed-use scenarios, the data indicates that AMD's higher percentile ranking (90 versus 83) reflects better overall performance across a broad spectrum of PassMark tests, even though Intel wins more of the math-oriented tests. Users who prioritize single-thread responsiveness and instruction-heavy tasks would favor AMD, while those running multi-threaded math or physics simulations would see better results from Intel.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD's Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, which is a modern, high-density node that enables lower power consumption and higher clock efficiency. This is a mobile-oriented design, as indicated by its AMD Socket FP11 and its 55 W TDP. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, which is a desktop part (Intel Socket 1700) with a lower 45 W TDP despite having more cores.

Cache configurations differ notably. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 per core versus Intel's 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is where Intel pulls ahead: 24 MB shared versus AMD's 16 MB shared. This larger L3 cache likely contributes to Intel's wins in physics and math benchmarks, as more cached data reduces memory access latency during complex calculations.

Memory support also diverges. AMD uses LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus but only 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD part's higher memory bandwidth is a significant advantage for data-intensive workloads, which may explain its wins in data compression and random string sorting. Both processors support ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers, meaning overclocking is not officially supported.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The newer PCIe Gen 5 standard on Intel allows for faster data transfer to compatible devices, though the practical impact depends on the peripherals used. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD includes Radeon 8040S, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most obvious difference. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. This gives Intel a 33% core advantage and a 33% thread advantage, which is directly reflected in its multithread benchmark win.

Clock speeds also differ. AMD runs at a 3.60 GHz base clock with a 4.90 GHz boost, while Intel runs at a 2.10 GHz base with a 5.20 GHz boost. The Intel part's higher boost clock likely contributes to its strong performance in math benchmarks, while AMD's higher base clock helps with sustained single-thread workloads.

The process node is a major differentiator: AMD uses 4 nm TSMC, while Intel uses 10 nm Intel. This node difference affects power efficiency and thermal characteristics, with AMD's smaller node typically allowing better performance per watt, though the TDP figures show Intel at 45 W versus AMD's 55 W. The socket types are incompatible: AMD Socket FP11 for the mobile part versus Intel Socket 1700 for the desktop part.

Memory bandwidth is another key spec difference. AMD supports 128.0 GB/s, while Intel supports 76.8 GB/s. This 51.4 GB/s gap favors AMD for memory-intensive tasks. The integrated graphics differ as well, with AMD using Radeon 8040S and Intel using UHD Graphics 730, though neither is specified as a high-performance GPU. The release dates show AMD launched on 2025-01-05, while Intel's release date is 2026-03-08, indicating a later market entry for the Intel part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 scores 3,995 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 7.5% higher than the Intel Core 5 213PTE's score of 3,718.

Q: How do the two processors compare in multithread performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins the multithread benchmark with a score of 25,590, which is 5.3% higher than the AMD's 24,244, despite AMD having a higher overall percentile ranking.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in the extended instructions test, where AMD leads by 50.7% (24,333 versus 16,146), followed closely by Intel's 52.2% lead in the find prime numbers test (157 versus 75).

Q: Which processor has more memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 supports 128.0 GB/s, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE supports 76.8 GB/s, giving AMD a substantial bandwidth advantage.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 8 cores and 16 threads, giving Intel a 2-core and 4-thread advantage.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 has 16 MB, making Intel's L3 cache 50% larger.