AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 and the Intel Core i5-14501E represent two fundamentally different approaches to six-core processing, but the recorded data shows only one side has a complete benchmark profile. The AMD part holds 11 recorded PassMark benchmark scores, while the Intel part has none in the database. This absence makes a direct head-to-head comparison one-sided, but the AMD results can still be contextualized against its nearest rivals to establish a performance baseline.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 delivers its strongest showing in the PassMark data compression test, scoring 293,595. This result is extraordinary in context: it exceeds the chip's own average benchmark score of 48,171 by a factor of six. The data encryption test returns 14,502, while extended instructions score 24,333. Floating point math reaches 53,084, and integer math hits 79,789. The multithread score of 24,244 indicates strong parallel throughput, while single-thread performance registers at 3,995 on the PassMark single-thread test. Random string sorting completes at 31,153, and the physics test scores 1,120. Prime number finding is the outlier, scoring only 75, which suggests the workload does not align with the architecture's strengths.

The AMD chip's average benchmark score of 48,171 places it in the 90th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A, scores 48,201, which is 0.1 percent higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48,287, 0.2 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900 scores 47,918, which is 0.5 percent lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D also scores 47,908, 0.5 percent lower. These deltas show the Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 sits within a tight cluster of high-end processors, effectively trading blows with the top competition.

Because the Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark scores recorded, its performance cannot be measured against the AMD part directly. The database only confirms its percentile ranking at 50, which places it below the AMD chip's 90th percentile. The average benchmark score for the Intel part is listed as zero, meaning no data supports a quantitative comparison. Any analysis of wins or losses must therefore rely on architectural characteristics rather than measured outcomes.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply at the architectural level. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses TSMC's 4 nm process node, while the Intel Core i5-14501E uses Intel's 10 nm node. The AMD chip is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Halo codename, part of the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation. The Intel chip uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series.

Both chips feature six cores and twelve threads, but their base and boost clocks differ. The AMD part runs at a 3.60 GHz base clock and boosts to 4.90 GHz. The Intel part starts at 3.30 GHz and boosts higher to 5.20 GHz. The Intel chip has a higher peak frequency, but the AMD chip has a higher base frequency. Thermal design power also differs: the AMD part is rated at 55 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 65 watts.

Cache hierarchies show notable differences. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: the AMD chip has 1 MB per core, while the Intel chip has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache differs more substantially: the AMD part has 16 MB shared, while the Intel part has 24 MB shared. The Intel chip also has a recorded die size of 215 mm², while the AMD chip has no die size listed.

Memory support separates the two clearly. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 supports LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with a recorded memory bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation and lane count. The AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part includes Radeon 8040S, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 770. The AMD chip targets the mobile market segment, while the Intel chip targets the desktop segment. Their sockets reflect this: AMD uses Socket FP11, while Intel uses Socket 1700.

The production status for both is active. The AMD part has a release date of 2025-01-05, while the Intel part has a release date of 2024-06-30. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded. Both have locked multipliers, meaning no overclocking headroom is available through multiplier adjustment.

Where Each One Wins

The data supports a clear split based on what is measurable. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 wins in every benchmark category where scores are recorded. Its data compression score of 293,595 is the standout result, far exceeding any other recorded metric. The floating point math score of 53,084 and integer math score of 79,789 indicate strong arithmetic throughput. The multithread score of 24,244 confirms robust parallel processing. The single-thread score of 3,995 establishes solid per-core performance. The extended instructions score of 24,333 suggests the architecture handles complex instruction sets effectively. Random string sorting at 31,153 shows strong memory and sorting throughput.

The Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores, so it cannot claim a measured win in any category. However, its architectural specifications suggest advantages in specific scenarios. The higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus the AMD chip's 4.90 GHz indicates potential for higher peak single-thread performance in workloads that rely on frequency. The larger L3 cache of 24 MB versus 16 MB could benefit workloads with large working sets that fit in cache. The Gen 5 PCIe interface offers double the bandwidth of Gen 4, which matters for storage or GPU connectivity in desktop builds. The support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides flexibility in system configuration.

The AMD chip's lower TDP of 55 watts versus 65 watts suggests better power efficiency, particularly relevant for mobile deployments. The higher memory bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s, tied to LPDDR5X support, benefits memory-intensive workloads. The Radeon 8040S integrated graphics likely offers stronger GPU performance than UHD Graphics 770, though no direct benchmarks confirm this. The AMD chip's 90th percentile ranking versus the Intel chip's 50th percentile indicates the database places the AMD part in a higher performance tier overall.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 has an average benchmark score of 48,171, placing it in the 90th percentile. The Intel Core i5-14501E has an average benchmark score of zero and sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 and the Intel Core i5-14501E have 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380's boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The AMD chip's base clock of 3.60 GHz is higher than the Intel chip's 3.30 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 supports LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded specifications:

• Base clock: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 at 3.60 GHz, Intel Core i5-14501E at 3.30 GHz
• Boost clock: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 at 4.90 GHz, Intel Core i5-14501E at 5.20 GHz
• TDP: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 at 55 watts, Intel Core i5-14501E at 65 watts
• Socket: AMD Socket FP11, Intel Socket 1700
• Architecture: Zen 5, Raptor Lake
• Codename: Strix Halo, Raptor Lake-R
• Process node: 4 nm (TSMC), 10 nm (Intel)
• L2 cache: 1 MB per core, 1.25 MB per core
• L3 cache: 16 MB shared, 24 MB shared
• Die size: Not listed, 215 mm²
• Memory support: LPDDR5X, DDR4 and DDR5
• Memory bandwidth: 128.0 GB/s, not listed
• PCIe: Gen 4, 16 lanes, Gen 5, 16 lanes
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 8040S, UHD Graphics 770
• Market segment: Mobile, Desktop
• Release date: 2025-01-05, 2024-06-30
• Part number: 100-000001425, Q49HSRNJM
• Percentile: 90, 50

The Verdict

The recorded data strongly favors the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 for any workload where benchmark scores matter. The AMD part holds an average benchmark score of 48,171, ranks in the 90th percentile, and has verified scores across 11 tests. The Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark scores in the database, an average score of zero, and a 50th percentile ranking. On measured performance alone, the AMD chip is the clear choice.

The AMD processor offers a lower TDP of 55 watts, higher memory bandwidth at 128.0 GB/s, and a smaller 4 nm process node. These characteristics suit mobile or power-constrained deployments. The Intel processor counters with a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz, larger L3 cache of 24 MB, and PCIe Gen 5 support. These features benefit desktop builds that prioritize peak frequency, large cache working sets, or the latest PCIe connectivity.

The Intel part's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides broader compatibility, while the AMD part's LPDDR5X support ties it to a specific memory standard. Both support ECC memory. Both have locked multipliers. The Intel chip has a larger die size at 215 mm², but no performance data supports a conclusion from that figure alone.

For users prioritizing measured performance, the database clearly indicates the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380. For users who require the architectural advantages of the Intel Core i5-14501E, such as higher boost clocks or Gen 5 PCIe, the Intel part offers those specific capabilities, but without recorded benchmarks, its performance remains unverified. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD chip delivers proven results, while the Intel chip awaits measurement.