AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents two processors aimed at fundamentally different segments, despite sharing the same core and thread counts. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14401E lands in the 60th percentile. This 30-point percentile gap is the first clear indicator of their separation in capability.

The AMD part, with its Zen 5 architecture and 4 nm process node, delivers substantially higher raw compute performance across the board. Its average benchmark score of 48171 dwarfs the Intel chip's 5253 average, a difference that places them in entirely different performance categories. The Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is a mobile processor with a 55 TDP, while the Intel Core i5-14401E is a desktop chip with a 65 TDP, so the comparison is not a like-for-like matchup in system design.

For users prioritizing maximum single-thread and multi-thread performance in a mobile form factor, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is the clear choice based on the data. The Intel Core i5-14401E, however, targets desktop builds with DDR4 or DDR5 memory support and a different platform ecosystem. Benchmark results indicate the AMD processor is in a higher performance tier, but the Intel part serves a distinct desktop market segment where its platform compatibility and 14th Gen Core positioning matter more than raw throughput.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is stark. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, codenamed Strix Halo. The Intel Core i5-14401E relies on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, built on Intel's 10 nm process node. These are not incremental differences but generational and fundamental design philosophy shifts.

The AMD chip is a mobile part using Socket FP11, while the Intel chip is a desktop processor on Socket 1700. Memory support diverges significantly: the AMD processor uses LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a listed memory bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s, whereas the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus but has no memory bandwidth figure recorded.

Cache layouts differ in the L2 and L3 levels. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. The larger Intel L3 cache could benefit certain workloads, but the benchmark data does not show this translating into a performance advantage in the recorded tests.

PCIe connectivity also separates the two. The AMD processor offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well: AMD uses the Radeon 8040S, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for reliability-focused builds.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two processors share no common benchmark tests in the database, which complicates direct comparison. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 has a full Passmark suite recorded, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has Cinebench results across R15, R20, and R23 versions.

For the AMD part, the Passmark data shows a single-thread score of 3995, a multi-thread score of 24244, integer math at 79789, floating point math at 53084, data compression at 293595, data encryption at 14502, extended instructions at 24333, find prime numbers at 75, physics at 1120, and random string sorting at 31153. The average benchmark score is 48171.

The Intel part's Cinebench results show R15 multi-core at 1830 and single-core at 258, R20 multi-core at 7627 and single-core at 1076, and R23 multi-core at 18161 and single-core at 2564. Its average benchmark score is 5253.

The nearest rivals data provides context for each processor's standing. The AMD chip's closest competitors are the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A at 48201 (-0.1%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX at 48287 (-0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 at 47918 (+0.5%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D at 47908 (+0.5%). The Intel chip's nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 at 5259 (-0.1%), the Intel Core i7-11700B at 5241 (+0.2%), the Intel Core i9-10850K at 5240 (+0.2%), and the Intel Core i5-13400T at 5210 (+0.8%).

The Intel Core i5-14401E's average score of 5253 places it in direct competition with older high-end desktop parts like the Core i9-10850K, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380's average of 48171 competes with modern Core Ultra 5 processors and high-end Ryzen 9 desktop chips. The AMD processor is roughly 9 times higher in average benchmark score than the Intel processor, a chasm that reflects not just architectural efficiency but also the different performance strata these chips occupy.

Specification Differences

The core counts match at 6 cores and 12 threads for both processors. The clock speeds differ notably: the AMD chip has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the Intel chip has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The AMD part runs at a higher base and boost frequency.

TDP levels differ: the AMD processor is rated at 55, while the Intel processor is rated at 65. The AMD chip is a mobile part, and the Intel chip is a desktop part. The process nodes diverge: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, while Intel uses 10 nm from its own foundry. The Intel chip has a recorded die size of 215 mm²; no die size is recorded for the AMD chip.

The L2 cache differs: AMD has 1 MB per core, Intel has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache differs: AMD has 16 MB shared, Intel has 20 MB shared. Memory support: AMD uses LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: AMD has 128.0 GB/s recorded, Intel has none recorded. PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 8040S, Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. Release dates differ: AMD was released on 2025-01-05, Intel on 2024-06-30. Both have ECC support and neither has an unlocked multiplier. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The AMD chip also has a higher base clock at 3.60 GHz versus 2.50 GHz.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 has an average benchmark score of 48171, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253, placing it in the 60th percentile.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 and the Intel Core i5-14401E support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 supports LPDDR5X with a recorded memory bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14401E supports DDR4 and DDR5 with no memory bandwidth figure recorded.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each?

A: Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 has 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip also has a larger L2 cache at 1.25 MB per core versus 1 MB per core.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 wins decisively in overall performance metrics. Its average benchmark score of 48171 versus 5253 shows a massive advantage. The percentile ranking of 90 versus 60 confirms this gap. The AMD chip's higher clock speeds, 4.90 GHz boost versus 4.70 GHz, and its more advanced 4 nm process node from TSMC contribute to this dominance. The mobile form factor with a 55 TDP and LPDDR5X memory support positions it for high-performance laptops and compact systems where power efficiency and bandwidth matter.

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in platform flexibility for desktop builders. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, allowing users to choose based on their existing components or budget. The Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes provides newer connectivity options versus the AMD chip's Gen 4. The larger L2 cache at 1.25 MB per core and L3 cache at 20 MB shared are advantages in cache-sensitive workloads. The desktop form factor with a 65 TDP suits traditional tower builds, and its release date of 2024-06-30 makes it an earlier-available option.

The Intel chip's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4, Core i7-11700B, Core i9-10850K, and Core i5-13400T, all within a narrow band of 5210 to 5259. This clustering shows the Intel part sits in a well-established performance tier with known desktop processors. The AMD chip's nearest rivals, the Core Ultra 5 235A and 245HX plus Ryzen 9 3900 and 7900X3D, show it competes with both modern mobile and high-end desktop hardware, a broader competitive footprint.

For single-thread performance, the AMD chip's Passmark single-thread score of 3995 indicates strong per-core capability, reinforced by its 4.90 GHz boost clock. The Intel chip's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2564 reflects its lower boost clock and older architecture. For multi-thread workloads, the AMD chip's Passmark multi-thread score of 24244 and integer math score of 79789 suggest substantial throughput, while the Intel chip's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18161 shows solid but lower multi-threaded performance.

The AMD processor wins for users needing maximum compute in a mobile package with high memory bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s and integrated Radeon 8040S graphics. The Intel processor wins for desktop users valuing DDR4 and DDR5 compatibility, Gen 5 PCIe, larger caches, and a familiar Socket 1700 platform. The data does not support a single universal winner; it supports two processors serving different system types and performance expectations.