AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Intel Core 7 360 occupy entirely different segments of the mobile processor market, and the benchmark data confirms this divide. The AMD part, with its 16 cores and 32 threads, dominates almost every metric in the database, while the Intel chip, a 6-core, 6-thread design, holds a narrow but real advantage in one specific single-threaded test. The data shows a 13 to 2 win split in favor of the AMD processor across their shared head-to-head benchmarks.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive victories for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 occur in multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads. In the Cinebench R15 multi-core test, the AMD scores 5463 against the Intel Core 7 360's 1374, a staggering 297.6% lead. Similarly, Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a 159% advantage, with scores of 35314 and 13634 respectively. These results indicate that the AMD processor is in a different performance class for rendering and heavily parallel tasks.

The PassMark suite reveals even larger deltas. In integer math, the AMD part scores 200665 compared to the Intel's 34238, a 486.1% difference, the largest gap recorded in the head-to-head set. Data compression shows a 383.4% lead (690650 vs 142877), and extended instructions show a 354.8% lead (56346 vs 12390). These are not marginal wins; they represent a fundamental throughput advantage for the AMD design.

The AMD processor also wins in floating-point math, scoring 128682 versus 44963, a 186.2% lead. It wins in physics (3481 vs 1213, 187% ahead), random string sorting (76177 vs 17636, 331.9% ahead), and data encryption (35455 vs 11164, 217.6% ahead). The multi-thread PassMark score favors AMD by 253.4%, with 54934 against 15544. Even in the less dramatic single-core Cinebench tests, AMD leads: R15 single-core is 63.7% higher (316 vs 193), and R23 single-core is 6.2% higher (2044 vs 1924).

The Intel Core 7 360 wins only one benchmark category, but it wins it twice. In PassMark single-thread and PassMark singlethread, it scores 4274 against AMD's 4147, a 3% advantage. This is the sole instance where the Intel chip outperforms its rival, and the margin is modest. The AMD processor wins the other 13 head-to-head comparisons, including all Cinebench tests and the full range of PassMark workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the clear winner for any workload that scales with core count, cache size, or memory bandwidth. Its 16 cores and 32 threads allow it to crush the Intel part in multi-core rendering, as shown by the Cinebench R23 and R15 results. The PassMark integer math and data compression scores indicate a massive advantage in productivity tasks, financial modeling, and database operations. The extended instructions test, which measures SIMD and specialized instruction throughput, also favors AMD by a wide margin, suggesting strength in scientific computing and media encoding.

The Intel Core 7 360 has one strength: single-threaded PassMark performance. Its score of 4274 edges out the AMD's 4147. This suggests it may have a slight edge in lightly threaded, latency-sensitive applications that rely on a single core and cannot utilize additional threads. However, this advantage is small, only 3%, and does not carry over to Cinebench single-core tests, where AMD leads by 6.2% in R23 and 63.7% in R15. The Intel chip's win is isolated to one testing methodology.

For all other purposes, the data points decisively to the AMD processor. The Intel part's wins are narrow and isolated, while the AMD part's wins are broad and often massive. The PassMark physics test, which simulates rigid body dynamics, shows AMD leading by 187%, indicating a strong advantage in gaming physics calculations. The floating-point math test, critical for scientific and engineering workloads, also favors AMD by 186.2%.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake codename on a 3 nm Intel process. The node difference favors Intel in theory, but the benchmark results show AMD's larger core count and cache configuration are far more impactful.

Core and thread counts differ sharply. AMD provides 16 cores and 32 threads, while Intel provides only 6 cores and 6 threads. This means the Intel chip has no hyperthreading, halving its potential thread count relative to cores. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel part has 2.5 MB of L2 per core but only 6 MB of shared L3. The L1 cache also differs: AMD uses 80 KB per core, Intel uses 192 KB per core.

Memory support is another major divergence. The AMD processor uses LPDDR5X memory in a quad-channel configuration, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel part supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X but uses a single-channel bus, capping bandwidth at 59.7 GB/s. This memory bandwidth difference is likely a key factor in the AMD part's overwhelming wins in data-heavy benchmarks like compression and integer math.

PCIe lanes also differ. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well: AMD includes the Radeon 8060S, while Intel includes the Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Clock speeds show AMD at 3.00 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost, while Intel runs at 1.50 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. The TDP figures are 55 W for AMD and 15 W for Intel, though the database does not provide direct power consumption measurements in the benchmark results.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two in the head-to-head tests?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark integer math, where the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 200665 against the Intel Core 7 360's 34238, a 486.1% difference.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 360 win any benchmark?

A: Yes, it wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 4274, which is 3% higher than the AMD's 4147.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports quad-channel LPDDR5X with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 7 360 supports single-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is built on a 4 nm TSMC process. The Intel Core 7 360 is built on a 3 nm Intel process.

Q: How do the cache sizes compare?

A: The AMD part has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3. The Intel part has 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and the Intel Core 7 360:

• Cores: 16 vs 6
• Threads: 32 vs 6
• Base Clock: 3.00 GHz vs 1.50 GHz
• Boost Clock: 5.10 GHz vs 4.80 GHz
• TDP: 55 W vs 15 W
• Socket: AMD Socket FP11 vs Intel BGA 1516
• Architecture: Zen 5 vs not specified
• Codename: Strix Halo vs Wildcat Lake
• Generation: Ryzen AI Max (Zen 5 (Strix Halo)) vs Core 5 (Wildcat Lake)
• Process Node: 4 nm vs 3 nm
• Foundry: TSMC vs Intel
• Die Size: 2x 70.6 mm² vs not specified
• L1 Cache: 80 KB (per core) vs 192 KB (per core)
• L2 Cache: 1 MB (per core) vs 2.5 MB (per core)
• L3 Cache: 64 MB (shared) vs 6 MB (shared)
• Memory Support: LPDDR5X vs DDR5, LPDDR5X
• Memory Bus: Quad-channel vs Single-channel
• Memory Bandwidth: 256.0 GB/s vs 59.7 GB/s
• ECC Memory: True vs False
• PCIe: Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) vs Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only)
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 8060S vs Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe)
• Release Date: 2025-01-05 vs 2026-04-15
• Launch MSRP: Not specified vs $426
• Part Number: 100-000001099 vs SAE3E

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the superior processor in nearly every measurable workload. It wins 13 of 15 head-to-head benchmarks, with leads ranging from 6.2% in Cinebench R23 single-core to 486.1% in PassMark integer math. Its 16-core, 32-thread configuration, 64 MB L3 cache, and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth make it dominant for multi-threaded rendering, data compression, encryption, and scientific computing.

The Intel Core 7 360 is a much smaller part. Its 6 cores, 6 threads, and 6 MB L3 cache place it in the lower tier of the database, as shown by its 72nd percentile versus the AMD's 95th percentile. Its single-thread PassMark win is narrow, only 3%, and does not offset the massive multi-threaded deficits. The Intel chip's only other notable trait is its lower TDP of 15 W and more recent release date of April 2026, but the recorded performance data does not show any corresponding advantage.

Users who need maximum compute throughput should choose the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395. Users who prioritize the single-thread PassMark metric above all else might consider the Intel Core 7 360, but the data shows that advantage is minimal and isolated. The AMD processor's average benchmark score of 77740 dwarfs the Intel's 18374, and its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i9-14900K, are within 1.7% of its average score, while the Intel Core 7 360's nearest rivals are within 0.4%, indicating it competes with entry-level desktop chips. The verdict is clear: the AMD part leads in all meaningful performance categories.