AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data presents a clear asymmetry between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has an extensive benchmark profile with 17 recorded scores, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This means all quantitative performance comparisons must rely on the AMD chip's measurements alone, and the Intel part's standing can only be inferred from its specifications and market positioning.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 delivers its strongest results in heavily multithreaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,314 and Geekbench multicore score of 20,992 indicate exceptional parallel processing capability. The Passmark multithread score of 54,934 reinforces this pattern, as does the Passmark integer math score of 200,665. These numbers place the chip at the 95th percentile among all CPUs in the database, a position that reflects its 16-core, 32-thread configuration.

In single-threaded tasks, the AMD chip remains competitive but less dominant. The Cinebench R15 single-core score of 316 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,044 show solid per-core performance, while the Passmark single-thread score of 4,147 confirms this trend. The chip's 5.10 GHz boost clock is identical to the Intel part's boost clock, suggesting comparable peak frequency potential, though the AMD architecture extracts more instructions per clock.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, would logically excel in lower-thread-count scenarios where its higher base clock of 2.20 GHz (compared to AMD's 3.00 GHz) and lower TDP of 45 watts (versus 55 watts) suggest a focus on efficiency. However, with no benchmark scores recorded, the database cannot confirm any specific advantage in these areas.

Architecture Differences

These processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process node, with the Strix Halo codename. It is built on a chiplet design with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture on Intel's 10 nm process, with the Raptor Lake-R codename and a monolithic die measuring 215 mm².

The core configurations differ substantially. AMD fields 16 cores and 32 threads, while Intel offers 6 cores and 12 threads. This 2.67x core advantage and 2.67x thread advantage explains the AMD chip's multicore dominance. Cache hierarchies also diverge: AMD provides 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3. Intel provides 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The AMD chip's 64 MB L3 cache is 2.67x larger than Intel's 24 MB, which benefits data-heavy workloads.

Memory support differs significantly. The AMD chip uses LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded. The AMD memory bandwidth advantage is substantial, particularly for memory-intensive applications. Both processors support ECC memory.

The integrated graphics solutions are also distinct. AMD includes the Radeon 8060S, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 770. The database does not record performance metrics for either GPU, but the product positioning suggests different intended use cases. The AMD chip's PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), giving Intel a newer PCIe standard.

The AMD chip is classified as a Mobile segment processor on AMD Socket FP11, released in January 2025. The Intel chip is classified as a Desktop segment processor on Intel Socket 1700, released in June 2024. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking potential is limited on both.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the stronger performer in almost every measurable category. Its 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs, combined with its comprehensive benchmark scores, positions it as a high-end mobile processor. The Intel Core i5-14501TE, ranked at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmarks, occupies a more mainstream desktop position.

Users requiring maximum multithreaded throughput should select the AMD chip based on its recorded results. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,314 and Passmark multithread score of 54,934 demonstrate capabilities far beyond what a 6-core part could plausibly achieve. The AMD chip's 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache make it suitable for rendering, compilation, scientific computing, and other parallel workloads.

Users prioritizing lower power consumption and desktop compatibility may prefer the Intel chip. Its 45 watt TDP is lower than AMD's 55 watts, and its Intel Socket 1700 platform is a common desktop standard. The Intel chip's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory offers flexibility in system building. However, without benchmark data, the Intel chip's actual performance advantages cannot be quantified.

The nearest rivals to the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 provide context for its standing. It sits 1.6% above the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX and 1.6% above the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P in average benchmark score. It sits 1.7% below the Intel Core i9-14900K and 2.0% above the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX. These margins show that the AMD chip operates in flagship territory, competing with high-end desktop and workstation processors despite its mobile classification.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed of each processor?

A: Both processors have a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The AMD chip has a base clock of 3.00 GHz, while the Intel chip has a base clock of 2.20 GHz.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD chip supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Does either processor have an unlocked multiplier?

A: No, neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Both are locked parts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Since the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, direct numerical comparisons are impossible. The analysis must instead rely on the AMD chip's absolute scores and its percentile positioning.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,314. This result, combined with the chip's 95th percentile ranking, places it above the vast majority of CPUs in the database. For context, the AMD chip's average benchmark score of 77,740 is 1.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX's 76,513 and 1.6% higher than the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P's 76,492. It trails the Intel Core i9-14900K's 79,097 by 1.7% and leads the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX's 76,212 by 2.0%.

The Passmark data compression score of 690,650 demonstrates exceptional throughput in compression workloads. The Passmark floating point math score of 128,682 and integer math score of 200,665 show balanced arithmetic performance across both number formats. The Passmark extended instructions score of 56,346 indicates strong SIMD and specialized instruction handling.

In single-threaded performance, the AMD chip's Cinebench R23 score of 2,044 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,464 are competitive but not class-leading. The Passmark single-thread score of 4,147 places it in a solid mid-to-high range. The identical 5.10 GHz boost clocks between the two processors suggest that single-threaded differences would stem primarily from architectural efficiency rather than clock speed.

The AMD chip's memory bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s over quad-channel LPDDR5X is a significant advantage over the Intel chip's dual-channel configuration, which has no recorded bandwidth figure. This bandwidth advantage directly benefits memory-bound workloads such as data compression, encryption, and large dataset processing. The AMD chip's Passmark data encryption score of 35,455 and random string sorting score of 76,177 reflect this memory throughput.

The Intel chip's 6-core, 12-thread configuration and 24 MB L3 cache position it for lighter workloads where the AMD chip's 16 cores would be underutilized. The Intel chip's lower 45 watt TDP also suggests better efficiency in constrained thermal environments. However, the absence of benchmark scores prevents any claim of measured superiority in these areas.

The AMD chip's die size of 2x 70.6 mm² indicates a multi-chiplet design, whereas the Intel chip's 215 mm² monolithic die represents a single piece of silicon. The AMD chip's 4 nm process from TSMC is more advanced than Intel's 10 nm process, contributing to its higher transistor density and potentially better power efficiency per operation.