AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

The database compares the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and the Intel Core i5-14401TE with an asymmetric set of records. The AMD part has a full suite of benchmark scores, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark entries. This makes the performance comparison one-sided: every recorded win belongs to the AMD part, and the Intel part's contribution to the comparison is limited to its specifications and its 50th percentile placement.

Where Each One Wins

All recorded benchmark wins are on the AMD side. The Intel part has no benchmark scores in the database, so no use-case win can be assigned to it. The AMD part records Cinebench R15 multicore 5463 and singlecore 316; Cinebench R23 multicore 35314 and singlecore 2044; Geekbench multicore 20992 and singlecore 2464. PassMark results include data compression 690650, data encryption 35455, extended instructions 56346, find prime numbers 303, floating point math 128682, integer math 200665, multithread 54934, physics 3481, random string sorting 76177, and single thread 4147.

These scores cover single-thread and multi-thread workloads, and the specialized PassMark tests add coverage for compression, encryption, extended instruction use, prime number search, floating point, integer, physics, and string sorting. The AMD part's own score gaps are consistent with its core count. Cinebench R15 multicore 5463 is much higher than singlecore 316; Cinebench R23 multicore 35314 is much higher than singlecore 2044; Geekbench multicore 20992 is much higher than singlecore 2464; PassMark multithread 54934 is much higher than single thread 4147. These internal comparisons show the multi-thread scaling in the recorded data. The Intel part has no scores to produce equivalent internal comparisons, so the data shows a complete sweep for the AMD part in every benchmark category present in the database.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14401TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel part; its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile among all CPUs is 50. No Cinebench, Geekbench, or PassMark scores are available for it.

Q: What are the Cinebench scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395?

A: The AMD part records Cinebench R15 multicore 5463 and singlecore 316, plus Cinebench R23 multicore 35314 and singlecore 2044.

Q: What are the core, thread, clock, and TDP differences?

A: The AMD part has 16 cores and 32 threads with base clock 3.00, boost clock 5.10, and TDP 55. The Intel part has 6 cores and 12 threads with base clock 2.00, boost clock 4.50, and TDP 45.

Q: How do the memory configurations differ?

A: The AMD part supports LPDDR5X with a quad-channel bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and no memory bandwidth value recorded.

Q: What socket, market segment, and integrated graphics are listed?

A: The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP11, is classified as Mobile, and uses Radeon 8060S. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700, is classified as Desktop, and uses UHD Graphics 730.

Q: Where does the AMD part sit relative to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score is 77740, which is 1.6% above the Threadripper PRO 9945WX's 76513, 1.6% above the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 76492, 2% above the Ryzen 9 8945HX's 76212, and 1.7% below the Core i9-14900K's 79097.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair, and the recorded win totals are 0 for both parts. The only average benchmark score in the comparison is 77740 for the AMD part against 0 for the Intel part. The AMD part sits at the 95th percentile; the Intel part at the 50th. The AMD part's highest recorded score is PassMark data compression 690650, followed by PassMark integer math 200665, PassMark floating point math 128682, and Cinebench R23 multicore 35314. Its lowest recorded score is PassMark find prime numbers 303.

The AMD part's single-thread results include Cinebench R23 singlecore 2044, Geekbench singlecore 2464, PassMark single thread 4147, and Cinebench R15 singlecore 316. Its multi-thread results include Cinebench R23 multicore 35314, Geekbench multicore 20992, PassMark multithread 54934, and Cinebench R15 multicore 5463. These gaps align with the 16-core/32-thread configuration. No Intel benchmark data exists to confirm any scaling behavior for the 6-core/12-thread part. The nearest rival data for the AMD part shows a tight cluster: 1.6% above the Threadripper PRO 9945WX, 1.6% above the EPYC Embedded 8224P, 2% above the Ryzen 9 8945HX, and 1.7% below the Core i9-14900K. The deltas range from 2% above to 1.7% below the listed rivals. Since the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores, the database cannot produce a margin-based head-to-head comparison; the only measurable side is the AMD part's results.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ in core count: 16 versus 6. Thread count: 32 versus 12. Base clock: 3.00 versus 2.00. Boost clock: 5.10 versus 4.50. TDP: 55 versus 45. Socket: AMD Socket FP11 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture: Zen 5 versus Raptor Lake. Codename: Strix Halo versus Raptor Lake-R. Process node: 4 nm versus 10 nm. Foundry: TSMC versus Intel. Die size: 2x 70.6 mm² versus 215 mm². L2 cache: 1 MB per core versus 1.25 MB per core. L3 cache: 64 MB shared versus 20 MB shared. Memory support: LPDDR5X versus DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bus: quad-channel versus dual-channel. Memory bandwidth: 256.0 GB/s versus no recorded value. PCIe: Gen 4 with 16 lanes versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: Radeon 8060S versus UHD Graphics 730. Market segment: Mobile versus Desktop. Release date: 2025-01-05 versus 2024-06-30. Part number: 100-000001099 versus Q4T4SRNJP. The Intel part carries the Core 14th Gen series label; the AMD part has no series label. The generation labels also differ: Ryzen AI Max (Zen 5 (Strix Halo)) for AMD, Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is direct. The AMD part uses Zen 5 on a 4 nm TSMC process with codename Strix Halo; the Intel part uses Raptor Lake on a 10 nm Intel process with codename Raptor Lake-R. Core topology differs sharply: 16 cores and 32 threads on the AMD side, 6 cores and 12 threads on the Intel side. The L1 cache size is identical at 80 KB per core, but the cache differences appear in L2 and L3: AMD lists 1 MB per core L2 and 64 MB shared L3, while Intel lists 1.25 MB per core L2 and 20 MB shared L3.

Memory architecture is also distinct: AMD uses LPDDR5X on a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with no bandwidth value recorded. PCIe generation differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 8060S on AMD, UHD Graphics 730 on Intel. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP11 and is classified as Mobile; the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as Desktop. Die size differs as well: 2x 70.6 mm² for AMD, 215 mm² for Intel. The multi-thread benchmark gaps in the AMD part's data align with its 16-core/32-thread configuration, while no Intel benchmark data exists to confirm any scaling behavior for the 6-core/12-thread part.