AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Core i7-14701E Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 vs Intel Core i7-14701E: Benchmark Analysis

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Intel Core i7-14701E represent two very different approaches to CPU design, one aimed at high-end mobile computing and the other at desktop workloads. The recorded data shows a clear split in performance characteristics, with the AMD part dominating multi-threaded and specialized instruction workloads while the Intel chip holds a narrower advantage in single-core tests. This analysis examines the benchmark results, architectural differences, and practical implications for each processor.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits into two distinct categories. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 wins 12 of the 15 recorded head-to-head comparisons, while the Intel Core i7-14701E wins 3. The AMD processor’s victories are concentrated in multi-threaded and throughput-oriented tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 5463 against Intel’s 2237, a 144.2% advantage. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result shows 35314 versus 22195, a 59.1% lead. PassMark multi-thread testing shows 54934 versus 26112, a 110.4% margin. The AMD chip also dominates in data compression, scoring 690650 against 282939, a 144.1% gap, and in integer math, where it scores 200665 versus 81325, a 146.7% advantage.

The Intel Core i7-14701E wins in single-core performance. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 3133 against AMD’s 2044, a 34.8% lead. PassMark single-thread results show Intel at 4305 versus AMD’s 4147, a 3.7% margin. The Cinebench R15 single-core test is nearly a tie, with AMD scoring 316 and Intel 315, a 0.3% difference in favor of AMD. The Intel chip also wins the PassMark single-thread test recorded under the alternate name “singlethread,” with the same 4305 versus 4147 result.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 uses Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Halo codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It features 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core i7-14701E uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core, while its shared L3 cache is 33 MB. The larger L3 cache on the AMD chip likely contributes to its strong performance in data-heavy workloads.

Memory support and platform features also divide the two. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel Core i7-14701E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD processor fits into AMD Socket FP11, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD chip integrates Radeon 8060S graphics, while Intel integrates UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor has a 55 W TDP, while Intel lists a 65 W TDP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single margin in the recorded data appears in PassMark extended instructions, where AMD scores 56346 against Intel’s 18528, a 204.1% advantage. This test typically exercises vector and SIMD instruction throughput, and the AMD result indicates a substantial capability in that area. PassMark random string sorting shows AMD at 76177 versus 29158, a 161.3% gap, indicating a strong advantage in memory-access-heavy algorithms. Integer math shows a 146.7% margin in AMD’s favor, and data compression shows a 144.1% margin.

The AMD processor also leads in floating-point math, scoring 128682 against Intel’s 61873, a 108% difference. Data encryption shows AMD at 35455 versus 14862, a 138.6% margin. Find prime numbers, a test sensitive to integer throughput and branch prediction, shows AMD at 303 versus 176, a 72.2% lead. Physics simulation in PassMark shows AMD at 3481 versus 2399, a 45.1% advantage.

The Intel processor’s wins are narrower. The Cinebench R23 single-core margin of 34.8% is its largest victory. The PassMark single-thread margin of 3.7% is modest. The Cinebench R15 single-core result is effectively a tie. These single-core advantages matter for lightly-threaded applications, but the overall pattern shows AMD leading in almost every throughput-oriented test.

Looking at the broader database context, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 77740. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, which scores 76513 on average, a 1.6% difference; the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P at 76492, also 1.6% behind; and the Intel Core i9-14900K at 79097, which is 1.7% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX trails by 2% with an average score of 76212. The Intel Core i7-14701E sits at the 83rd percentile, with an average benchmark score of 33206. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H at 33201, a 0% difference; the AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS at 33244, 0.1% behind; the AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX at 33091, 0.3% ahead; and the Intel Core i7-13650HX at 33089, 0.4% ahead. The gap between the two processors in average score is substantial, with AMD’s 77740 versus Intel’s 33206.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is the stronger processor for multi-threaded workloads, data-heavy tasks, and any application that can use more than a few cores. Its 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with 64 MB of shared L3 cache and 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, deliver decisive wins in Cinebench multi-core tests, PassMark multi-thread, compression, encryption, integer math, and extended instructions. The 95th percentile ranking places it among the top CPUs in the database, with an average score more than double that of the Intel part.

The Intel Core i7-14701E wins in single-core performance, particularly in Cinebench R23 single-core where its 3133 score beats AMD’s 2044 by 34.8%. Its higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz, compared to AMD’s 5.10 GHz, supports that result. For users running lightly-threaded applications, such as older games or single-threaded productivity tools, the Intel chip offers a measurable advantage. However, the margin in PassMark single-thread testing is only 3.7%, suggesting the real-world difference may be small outside specific workloads.

The choice between these two depends on workload profile. The AMD processor is the clear pick for rendering, video encoding, scientific computing, data analysis, and any parallel workload. The Intel processor is the pick for tasks that rely heavily on single-thread performance and where its 10 nm process and dual-channel memory support are sufficient. The AMD part’s quad-channel LPDDR5X memory and larger L3 cache provide a structural advantage in bandwidth-sensitive applications, while Intel’s PCIe Gen 5 support may matter for storage and expansion in desktop builds.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14701E has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the largest benchmark margin between the two?

A: The PassMark extended instructions test shows the largest margin, with AMD scoring 56346 against Intel’s 18528, a 204.1% difference.

Q: Does the Intel processor win any benchmark tests?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i7-14701E wins 3 of 15 recorded tests: Cinebench R23 single-core, PassMark single-thread, and PassMark singlethread (the same test under a different name).

Q: What memory bandwidth does the AMD processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 supports LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel Core i7-14701E supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has a TDP of 55 W, while the Intel Core i7-14701E has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD processor has an average benchmark score of 77740, placing it at the 95th percentile. The Intel processor has an average score of 33206, placing it at the 83rd percentile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | Intel Core i7-14701E |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 16 | 8 |

| Threads | 32 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP11 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Strix Halo | Raptor Lake-R |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 2x 70.6 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 8060S | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2024-06-30 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |