AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i or the Intel Processor U302L. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and both processors show an average benchmark score of zero. Consequently, there are no direct performance comparisons available from the recorded data. This absence of measurements means that any quantitative performance ranking between these two parts cannot be established from the current database entries. The percentile ranking for both CPUs is identical at 50, indicating that neither has been positioned relative to other processors in the database based on actual test runs. Without benchmark results, the analysis must rely strictly on the architectural and specification differences recorded for each unit.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i carries a core configuration of 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Processor U302L offers 5 cores and 6 threads, with a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz. These raw specifications suggest a substantial difference in multi-threaded capability, as the AMD part has more than twice the core count and four times the thread count. The clock speed advantage also favors AMD, with a boost ceiling that is more than double that of the Intel part. However, without benchmark scores, these specifications cannot be translated into measured performance deltas.

The thermal design power figures differ meaningfully: the AMD processor is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel processor is rated at 15 watts. This indicates that the AMD part is designed to draw more power under load, which aligns with its higher core count and clock speeds. The Intel part's lower TDP suggests a focus on efficiency and lower thermal output, but again, no measured performance data exists to verify how these power envelopes translate into actual workload results.

Memory bandwidth figures are recorded for the AMD processor at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no memory bandwidth entry in the database. This missing data point prevents a direct comparison of memory throughput. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The Intel part does not support ECC memory, whereas the AMD part does. These differences in memory capabilities are structural and could influence performance in memory-sensitive workloads, but the lack of benchmark data means the practical impact remains unquantified.

PCI Express lane counts also differ: the AMD processor provides 16 lanes of Gen 4 connectivity, while the Intel processor provides 8 lanes of Gen 4. This gives the AMD part twice the PCIe lane availability, which could matter for systems with multiple high-bandwidth peripherals. Again, no benchmark results are available to show how this affects real-world performance.

The Verdict

Based solely on the recorded data, a definitive performance verdict cannot be issued because no benchmark scores exist for either processor. The database shows zero wins for each in head-to-head comparisons, and the wins counters for both items are set to zero. The percentile rankings are identical, and the average benchmark scores are both zero. This means that from a measured performance standpoint, the two CPUs are indistinguishable in the current database.

What the data does show is a clear divergence in specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i offers a larger core count, higher clock speeds, more PCIe lanes, ECC memory support, and a higher TDP. The Intel Processor U302L offers fewer cores, lower clocks, half the PCIe lanes, no ECC support, and a lower TDP. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. The AMD part has a codename of Gorgon Point and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation based on Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. The Intel part uses Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-PS.

For a user who prioritizes multi-threaded compute, the AMD part's 12 cores and 24 threads versus the Intel part's 5 cores and 6 threads is a substantial gap on paper. The AMD part also has a significantly higher boost clock, which could favor single-threaded responsiveness. The Intel part's lower TDP might appeal in power-constrained designs, but without benchmark data, the actual efficiency trade-off cannot be measured. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $285, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. This price difference is the only cost-related data point available, and it should not be interpreted as a value judgment without performance context.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Processor U302L has a boost clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor U302L does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is rated at 28 watts TDP. The Intel Processor U302L is rated at 15 watts TDP.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i provides 16 Gen 4 lanes (CPU only). The Intel Processor U302L provides 8 Gen 4 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Processor U302L uses a 10 nm process node from Intel.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 1.20 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.10 GHz for AMD and 2.40 GHz for Intel. TDP ratings are 28 watts for AMD and 15 watts for Intel. The sockets differ: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.

Cache configurations vary. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core but has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 10 MB of shared L3 cache. The L2 cache per core is slightly larger on the Intel part, but the total L3 cache is larger on the AMD part.

Memory support differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus but has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory support is present on the AMD part and absent on the Intel part. PCIe connectivity differs as well: AMD provides 16 Gen 4 lanes, while Intel provides 8 Gen 4 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD part uses Radeon 890M graphics. The Intel part uses UHD Graphics 80EU. The AMD part has a die size of 233 mm², while the Intel part has no recorded die size. The AMD part has a production status of Active, and the Intel part also has a production status of Active. The Intel part has a recorded part number of SRPKGQ5CX, while the AMD part has an unknown part number. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $285, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is substantial. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The Intel Processor U302L uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The smaller process node on the AMD side typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency, although no transistor counts are recorded for either part.

The AMD processor is based on the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which the database identifies as Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. The Intel processor is based on the Raptor Lake-PS codename and uses Raptor Lake architecture. These are fundamentally different microarchitectures from different design generations, with AMD's Zen 5 lineage being newer than Intel's Raptor Lake lineage based on the release dates.

Release dates differ. The AMD processor has a release date of 2026-02-28. The Intel processor has a release date of 2024-04-07. This places the AMD part almost two years later in the timeline, which aligns with the newer process node and architecture generation. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process, which is a larger node compared to the AMD part's 4 nm node.

Cache architecture differs in structure. The AMD part uses 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part uses 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 10 MB of shared L3 cache. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part's L3 cache is not labeled as shared in the database, while the Intel part's L3 is explicitly shared. The AMD part has a die size of 233 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Intel part.

Memory architecture differs in supported types. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure. ECC memory support is exclusive to the AMD part. Both use dual-channel memory buses. PCIe generation is Gen 4 for both, but lane counts differ at 16 for AMD and 8 for Intel.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark data, wins cannot be assigned based on measured performance. The database records zero wins for both processors in head-to-head comparisons. However, the specification differences allow for a structural assessment of where each part has advantages on paper.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins on core count and thread count, offering 12 cores and 24 threads versus 5 cores and 6 threads. It also wins on clock speeds, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 1.20 GHz and 2.40 GHz on the Intel part. The AMD part has a larger L3 cache at 16 MB versus 10 MB. The AMD part provides more PCIe lanes at 16 versus 8. The AMD part supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. The AMD part has a smaller process node at 4 nm versus 10 nm. The AMD part uses a newer architecture generation (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) and has a later release date. The AMD part records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded bandwidth. The AMD part has a larger die size at 233 mm², though no die size is recorded for the Intel part.

The Intel Processor U302L wins on TDP, rated at 15 watts versus 28 watts for the AMD part. This lower thermal envelope could suit passively cooled or power-constrained systems. The Intel part has a slightly larger L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 1 MB. The Intel part supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which may offer broader memory compatibility in existing systems. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $285, while the AMD part has no recorded MSRP, though this price point should not be interpreted as a value metric without performance data. The Intel part also has a recorded part number, which may aid in procurement tracking.

For workloads that are heavily multi-threaded, such as compilation, rendering, or virtualization, the AMD part's core and thread advantage is the dominant factor. For workloads that are single-threaded, the AMD part's boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 2.40 GHz suggests a clear advantage on paper. For systems where power draw is the primary constraint, the Intel part's lower TDP is the distinguishing factor. For memory-sensitive applications, the AMD part's higher memory bandwidth figure and ECC support provide structural benefits. For systems requiring more PCIe devices, the AMD part's 16 lanes versus 8 lanes is a clear differentiator. The absence of benchmark scores means these assessments remain speculative, grounded only in the recorded specifications.