AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Processor N150. However, the Intel Processor N150 has four recorded benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has none. This asymmetry in the database means that direct performance comparisons must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than measured test results.

The Intel Processor N150 delivers a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 422.5 and a single-core score of 153.15. In Cinebench R23, it records a multi-core score of 2590.5 and a single-core score of 935. These results place the N150 at the 28th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 1025. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T with an average score of 1024, a delta of 0.1 percent, and the Intel Core i3-4340 with an average score of 1026, a delta of negative 0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U matches the N150 within 0.1 percent, and the Intel Core i7-5650U scores 1027, a negative 0.2 percent delta. These figures indicate that the N150 sits in a tightly contested performance band, with less than half a percent separating it from its closest competitors.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i, the absence of benchmark scores means the database cannot quantify its performance percentile, average score, or rival deltas. The 50th percentile placeholder value assigned to it carries no measured weight. Consequently, the head-to-head analysis for this pair is limited to what the recorded specifications imply about relative capability, not what test results demonstrate.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed ranges for the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Processor N150 has a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor N150 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What integrated graphics do the processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Radeon 890M. The Intel Processor N150 uses the UHD Graphics 730.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Processor N150 has a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s.

Q: When was each processor released?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a release date of February 28, 2026. The Intel Processor N150 has a release date of November 19, 2024.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die size measures 233 mm². The Intel Processor N150 uses the Twin Lake codename and architecture, belonging to the Intel Processor generation based on Alder Lake-N. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. No die size is recorded for the N150.

Cache structures differ substantially. The AMD processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 96 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. These configurations reflect distinct design philosophies: the AMD chip distributes L2 across cores, while the Intel chip shares a smaller L2 pool across all cores.

PCIe support also differs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Processor N150 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes from the CPU. This represents a generation gap in interconnect technology and a lane count difference that affects expansion capabilities.

Memory architecture diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration. The Intel processor supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory in a single-channel configuration. The dual-channel setup on the AMD side enables higher theoretical memory bandwidth, recorded at 89.6 GB/s compared to 38.4 GB/s for the Intel part.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts present the most immediate distinction: 12 cores and 24 threads for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i versus 4 cores and 4 threads for the Intel Processor N150. Clock speeds follow a similar pattern, with the AMD part reaching a 5.10 GHz boost clock against a 3.60 GHz boost clock for the Intel part. The base clocks differ even more starkly: 2.00 GHz for AMD versus 0.10 GHz for Intel.

Thermal design power shows a wide gap. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 6 watts. This indicates the AMD chip consumes significantly more power and likely requires more substantial cooling, while the Intel chip is designed for lower-power environments.

Socket compatibility is entirely separate. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1264. These sockets are not interchangeable, meaning motherboard selection is dictated by the processor choice.

Memory support differs in both type and channel configuration. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel mode with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 in single-channel mode with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory support is present on the AMD processor but absent on the Intel processor.

The integrated graphics differ, with the AMD processor featuring the Radeon 890M and the Intel processor featuring the UHD Graphics 730. PCIe capabilities also differ: Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD, Gen 3 with 9 lanes for Intel.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Processor N150 occupy very different positions in the processor landscape. The AMD part triples the core count, multiplies thread count by six, and offers a significantly higher boost clock. It also provides double the memory bandwidth, dual-channel support, ECC capability, and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity. The Intel part counters with a much lower TDP of 6 watts, a smaller process node advantage in its favor, and a release date over a year earlier.

The Intel Processor N150 has measured benchmark results placing it at the 28th percentile among all CPUs, with an average score of 1025. Its nearest rivals all fall within 0.2 percent of its average score, showing that it performs in line with older mid-range desktop and mobile processors. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark scores, so its performance standing cannot be established from the database.

Given the specification advantages in cores, threads, clocks, memory bandwidth, and PCIe generation, the AMD processor is positioned for workloads that demand parallel processing and high throughput. The Intel processor, with its 6-watt TDP and modest specifications, is positioned for low-power, lightweight tasks. The choice between them depends on whether the priority is multi-threaded capability or minimal power consumption.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins in scenarios that benefit from its 12 cores and 24 threads. Multi-threaded workloads such as content rendering, compilation, and virtualization can utilize the higher thread count. The 5.10 GHz boost clock provides strong single-thread headroom. The dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth supports data-intensive operations. The ECC memory support suits reliability-conscious deployments in embedded or server-like roles. PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes enables faster peripheral connectivity compared to the Intel part.

The Intel Processor N150 wins in scenarios that prioritize low power consumption. Its 6-watt TDP allows for passive cooling solutions and compact designs where thermal management is constrained. The measured benchmark scores, while modest, show that it delivers functional performance for everyday tasks. Its support for DDR4 memory provides compatibility with existing, lower-cost memory modules. The single-channel memory bus and PCIe Gen 3 lanes are sufficient for lightweight embedded applications, thin clients, or basic mobile computing.

The data does not support a direct performance comparison between the two, as no head-to-head benchmark results exist. However, the architectural gap in cores, threads, memory channels, and PCIe generation suggests that the AMD processor targets a higher performance tier, while the Intel processor targets an efficiency tier. Each wins in its respective domain: the AMD part for throughput and expandability, the Intel part for power economy and simplicity.