AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core i7-14700F?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F boosts up to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i boosts up to 5.10 GHz.

Q: What process nodes are used for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is built on TSMC's 4 nm process. The Intel Core i7-14700F uses Intel's 10 nm process node.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core i7-14700F support ECC memory.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor include?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i includes a Radeon 890M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i7-14700F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: What is the market segment for each product?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is classified as a mobile processor, while the Intel Core i7-14700F is a desktop processor.

The Verdict

The database records show two processors with very different positioning. The Intel Core i7-14700F sits in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53620. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a 50th percentile ranking and no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which makes direct performance comparisons impossible. All available benchmark data belongs to the Intel part.

For workloads that demand high multi-threaded throughput, the Intel Core i7-14700F is the clear choice based on the recorded data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 and Geekbench multicore score of 19620 demonstrate strong parallel processing capability. The chip also delivers a PassMark multithread score of 41317, which places it among the top performers tracked by the database.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i targets a different use case entirely. As a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, it prioritizes power efficiency over raw performance. The Intel Core i7-14700F carries a 65 W TDP and requires a desktop platform with Socket 1700. Users building power-constrained embedded or mobile systems would select the AMD part for its lower thermal envelope and integrated Radeon 890M graphics. Users building desktop workstations would select the Intel part for its higher core count, larger cache, and substantially better recorded benchmark performance.

The Intel Core i7-14700F also offers PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes, which provides more modern I/O connectivity compared to the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 implementation. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The AMD processor has a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, a figure not recorded for the Intel part.

Market positioning differs as well. The Intel Core i7-14700F launched in January 2024 with a launch MSRP of $359. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is a newer product, with a release date in February 2026. The Intel part has an established benchmark record, while the AMD part has no benchmark entries in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core i7-14700F. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero. However, the Intel Core i7-14700F has a comprehensive set of benchmark scores that can be interpreted on its own.

In Cinebench R15, the Intel processor scores 3540 in multicore and 499 in singlecore. In Cinebench R20, it scores 14751 multicore and 2082 singlecore. The Cinebench R23 results show 35122 multicore and 4958 singlecore. These scores indicate strong scaling across the 20 cores and 28 threads.

Geekbench results show 19620 multicore and 2429 singlecore. The singlecore score of 2429 reflects the 5.40 GHz boost clock. The multicore score benefits from the combination of high core count and sustained boost behavior.

PassMark results cover a range of specialized workloads. Data compression scores 505885, data encryption scores 30144, and extended instructions scores 28564. Floating point math scores 107005, integer math scores 155808, and multithread performance scores 41317. Physics scores 2455, random string sorting scores 55918, and single thread performance scores 4257. Find prime numbers scores 176.

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i7-14700F provide context for its average score. The Intel Xeon 6505P has an average score of 53701, which is 0.2% higher than the i7-14700F. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, which is 0.6% lower. The AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, which is 0.8% lower. These small differences show the i7-14700F sits in a tightly contested performance tier.

Without benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i, no direct score comparisons can be made. The database records no wins for either processor in head-to-head testing.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. Base clocks are close, with the AMD part at 2.00 GHz and the Intel part at 2.10 GHz. Boost clocks show a larger gap, with the Intel part reaching 5.40 GHz compared to 5.10 GHz for the AMD part.

Thermal design power differs substantially. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has a 65 W TDP. This reflects their different market segments, mobile versus desktop.

Sockets are incompatible. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor is codenamed Gorgon Point and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. The Intel processor is codenamed Raptor Lake-R and belongs to the Core 14th Gen family built on Raptor Lake architecture.

Process technology differs as well. The AMD part uses TSMC's 4 nm node, while the Intel part uses Intel's 10 nm node. Die size also varies, with the AMD part measuring 233 mm² and the Intel part measuring 257 mm².

Cache configurations differ significantly. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for the AMD part and 2 MB per core for the Intel part. L3 cache totals 16 MB for the AMD part and 33 MB shared for the Intel part. The Intel part has more than double the L3 cache.

Memory support differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is recorded for the Intel part. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe support differs by generation. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD part featuring a Radeon 890M and the Intel part having no integrated graphics.

The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $359 and a part number of SRN3Z. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded and its part number is listed as unknown. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c core arrangement under the Gorgon Point codename. This mobile-oriented design combines high-performance and high-efficiency core types within a single die. The 4 nm process from TSMC enables the compact 233 mm² die. The architecture emphasizes power efficiency given its 28 W TDP, which suits embedded and mobile deployments.

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. This is a desktop design built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 257 mm² die. The 20-core configuration includes performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the exact breakdown. The 65 W TDP allows higher sustained power delivery, which supports the higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Cache architecture differs in structure. The AMD part provides 1 MB of L2 per core and a 16 MB L3 pool. The Intel part provides 2 MB of L2 per core and a 33 MB shared L3. The larger L3 cache on the Intel part benefits workloads with repeated data access patterns across multiple cores.

Memory architecture reflects the intended use cases. The AMD part supports LPDDR5X, which is optimized for mobile power consumption and bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, offering flexibility for desktop builds with existing memory or newer DDR5 platforms. The AMD part's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provides a measured figure, while the Intel part has no bandwidth measurement in the database.

PCIe architecture differs by generation. The Intel part provides Gen 5 connectivity, which doubles the theoretical bandwidth per lane compared to the AMD part's Gen 4 implementation. For storage and GPU expansion, this gives the Intel platform an I/O advantage.

Integrated graphics represent a major architectural difference. The AMD part includes a Radeon 890M GPU, which enables display output and light graphics workloads without a discrete graphics card. The Intel part has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU for any display output.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700F wins in every recorded benchmark category because the database contains no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i. The Intel part's multicore performance is particularly strong. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35122 and PassMark multithread score of 41317 indicate excellent parallel workload handling. The Geekbench multicore score of 19620 reinforces this capability.

Single-thread performance also favors the Intel part based on recorded data. The Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 4958 and PassMark single thread score of 4257 reflect the 5.40 GHz boost clock. The Geekbench singlecore score of 2429 supports this pattern.

Specialized workloads show the Intel part's breadth. Data compression scores 505885, indicating strong throughput for archiving and storage workloads. Integer math scores 155808, and floating point math scores 107005, showing capability across both integer and floating point calculations. Extended instructions score 28564, and data encryption scores 30144. Random string sorting scores 55918, and physics scores 2455.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins in categories that are not benchmark-based. Its 28 W TDP makes it suitable for thermally constrained environments where the Intel part's 65 W TDP would be prohibitive. Its integrated Radeon 890M graphics provide display capability without a discrete GPU, which the Intel part cannot match. Its support for LPDDR5X memory enables compact, power-efficient system designs. Its 4 nm process node from TSMC represents a more advanced manufacturing process than the Intel part's 10 nm node.

The AMD part also has a newer release date, February 2026, compared to January 2024 for the Intel part. This suggests the AMD part benefits from more recent design techniques, though the database records no performance data to quantify that advantage.

For users building desktop systems with a discrete GPU, the Intel Core i7-14700F delivers the recorded performance needed for rendering, compilation, and other multi-threaded tasks. For users building embedded or mobile systems where power and space are constrained, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i offers integrated graphics and a lower TDP, though its performance characteristics remain unmeasured in the database.