AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core i5-14600T Comparison

The Verdict

The data in this comparison is one-sided, but the explanation is structural. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark entries in the database, while the Intel Core i5-14600T has a full suite of results across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests. The Intel part sits at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32707. The AMD part is recorded at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero, which reflects missing measurements rather than a literal performance of zero. For any user choosing strictly from recorded data, the Core i5-14600T is the only option with verified performance numbers. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i cannot be positioned as a faster or slower alternative because the database contains no scores for it. The Intel processor delivers measured multicore throughput of 22447 in Cinebench R23 and a Geekbench multicore score of 12840. The AMD processor is an active production part with a 28 W TDP and a 5.10 GHz boost clock, but without benchmark data, its relative standing is undefined.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600T wins every category by default because it is the only processor in the comparison with benchmark entries. Its single-core results include a Cinebench R23 score of 3169, a Geekbench single-core score of 2559, and a Passmark single-thread score of 3744. Multithreaded results are equally well documented, with a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 9427 and a Passmark multithread score of 26409. Specialized workloads also show recorded performance: Passmark integer math reaches 95112, floating point math reaches 64726, and data compression reaches 301827. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no wins in any category because no category has a recorded score. The use-case split therefore favors Intel for every measurable workload, from physics calculations at 1873 in Passmark to random string sorting at 34310. The AMD part offers a different feature set, including an integrated Radeon 890M graphics solution, but the database does not quantify any CPU workload advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14600T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². Core counts differ: the AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part has 14 cores and 20 threads. The Intel processor uses a hybrid configuration typical of Raptor Lake, though the database does not list the exact P-core and E-core split. Both processors boost to 5.10 GHz, but base clocks differ slightly, with AMD at 2.00 GHz and Intel at 1.80 GHz.

Cache layouts are distinct. The AMD processor provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel's larger L2 and L3 allocations may benefit workloads with repeated data access, though the database does not include cache-specific benchmarks to confirm this. Memory support also diverges. AMD lists DDR5 and LPDDR5X support with dual-channel memory and a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel lists DDR4 and DDR5 support with dual-channel memory, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities differ: AMD offers Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ as well, with AMD using the Radeon 890M and Intel using UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part is classified as a mobile segment processor on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part is a desktop segment processor on Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $255. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The Intel part was released in January 2024, while the AMD part carries a release date of February 2026. The AMD processor is unlocked? No, the multiplier is locked on both parts. The Intel part number is SRN46; the AMD part number is recorded as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: Both processors boost to 5.10 GHz, so they are identical in maximum clock speed.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14600T support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the database lists DDR4 and DDR5 support for the Intel part. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X only.

Q: Which processor has a higher recorded average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has an average benchmark score of 32707. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a recorded average score of zero, which reflects absent benchmark data.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD processor has a 28 W TDP, and the Intel processor has a 35 W TDP.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table in the database is empty, with zero recorded wins for either processor. That means the comparison relies entirely on the Intel part's standalone benchmark suite. The Core i5-14600T produces a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22447 and a single-core score of 3169. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 9427 and the single-core score is 1330. Cinebench R15 results are 2262 multicore and 319 single-core. Geekbench results show 12840 multicore and 2559 single-core. Passmark results cover a wide range of operations: multithread at 26409, single-thread at 3744, integer math at 95112, floating point math at 64726, extended instructions at 16985, data compression at 301827, data encryption at 18226, physics at 1873, random string sorting at 34310, and prime number finding at 121.

The nearest rivals to the Intel processor in the database are all close in average score. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average score of 32697 with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average score of 32750 with a delta of -0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 has an average score of 32662 with a delta of 0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H has an average score of 32812 with a delta of -0.3 percent. These deltas indicate that the Core i5-14600T sits within a fraction of a percent of several comparable processors, making its measured performance highly competitive in its immediate peer group. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no nearest rivals listed, which reinforces the absence of benchmark context for that part.

The Intel processor's percentile rank of 83 places it above the majority of all CPUs in the database. Its average score of 32707, combined with the near-zero deltas against the Ultra 7 155H, Ryzen 5 7400F, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, and Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, suggests that these four processors form a tight performance cluster. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i, by contrast, is recorded at the 50th percentile with no average score and no rival comparisons, so it cannot be placed within any performance cluster. The data shows that the Intel part is a well-characterized desktop processor with broad workload coverage, while the AMD part is a mobile embedded processor whose benchmark profile remains unmeasured in the database. The process node difference, 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel, and the memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s for AMD are architectural facts, but they do not translate into recorded performance scores. The Intel part's L3 cache of 24 MB is larger than the AMD part's 16 MB, and its L2 cache of 2 MB per core doubles the AMD part's 1 MB per core. These cache advantages appear in the specification data, yet no benchmark confirms their impact. The comparison, as recorded, is a single-processor profile rather than a true head-to-head.