AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core i5-14500T?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD part uses simultaneous multithreading to reach 24 threads from 12 cores, whereas the Intel part combines performance and efficient cores for its 14-core, 20-thread configuration.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i5-14500T's boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD part and 1.70 GHz for the Intel part.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T holds an 80th percentile ranking, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i sits at the 50th percentile. The Intel processor's average benchmark score is 28065, placing it well above the AMD part in overall standing.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel Core i5-14500T supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both processors use a dual-channel memory bus, and both support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel Core i5-14500T uses Intel's 10 nm process. The AMD part has a die size of 233 mm², and the Intel part has a die size of 215 mm².

Q: What integrated graphics do the two processors include?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i includes the Radeon 890M integrated graphics, while the Intel Core i5-14500T includes the UHD Graphics 770.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i belongs to the Gorgon Point generation and uses a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c core arrangement. This 12-core, 24-thread design pairs full-size Zen 5 cores with denser Zen 5c cores, a strategy that balances high single-thread performance with multi-thread throughput. The chip is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process, giving it a smaller transistor geometry than the Intel part. The AMD processor targets the mobile segment and fits into AMD Socket FP8, with a thermal design power of 28 W. Its cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3.

The Intel Core i5-14500T uses the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture, part of the Core 14th Gen family. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process and houses 14 cores with 20 threads, arranged as a mix of P-cores and E-cores. The chip is designed for desktop systems and uses Intel Socket 1700, with a thermal design power of 35 W. Its cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a larger 24 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel part also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel processor integrates UHD Graphics 770, whereas the AMD chip carries the Radeon 890M.

Both processors support ECC memory and have locked multipliers. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with no recorded memory bandwidth figure. The AMD chip has a release date in early 2026, and the Intel chip was released in early 2024. The Intel processor has a known part number, SRN3P, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown. The AMD chip has a larger die at 233 mm² despite having fewer cores, while the Intel die is 215 mm².

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains recorded benchmark results for the Intel Core i5-14500T but no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i. The Intel processor's scores therefore define its measured performance profile across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark suites. In Cinebench R23, the Intel part scores 11790 in multicore and 1838 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 8177 multicore and 1154 single-core, and in Cinebench R15, it scores 2022 multicore and 252 single-core. These results show a consistent single-core scaling pattern across the three Cinebench versions, with the multicore scores scaling as expected with thread count.

Geekbench results for the Intel Core i5-14500T show 11894 in multicore and 2229 in single-core. Passmark results cover a broader range of workloads. The processor scores 22910 in multithread and 3736 in single-thread. In math workloads, it scores 80922 in integer math and 58869 in floating point math. Data compression reaches 262417, while data encryption reaches 15410. Extended instructions score 16043, and random string sorting reaches 28462. The chip also records 81 in find prime numbers and 1288 in physics.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has zero recorded benchmark scores in the database, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. This means no direct head-to-head comparison of measured workload performance is possible from the recorded data. The Intel part's 80th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 28065 provide a reference point, but the AMD part's 50th percentile ranking is based on its classification rather than measured scores.

The nearest rivals to the Intel Core i5-14500T in the database include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE with an average score of 28054 and a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G with 28032 and a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Core i9-12900H with 28003 and a delta of 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 with 28128 and a delta of -0.2%. These deltas show that the Intel part's measured performance sits within a narrow band of similar processors, with the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 slightly ahead by 0.2% and the Intel Core i9-12900H slightly behind by 0.2%.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clocks differ at 2.00 GHz for the AMD part versus 1.70 GHz for the Intel part, and boost clocks differ at 5.10 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. Thermal design power is 28 W for the AMD chip and 35 W for the Intel chip. Sockets differ: AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD part and Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part.

The cache configurations differ notably. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core, but the AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core while the Intel part has 1.25 MB per core. L3 cache is 16 MB shared on the AMD chip versus 24 MB shared on the Intel chip. Process nodes differ: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The foundries also differ, with TSMC producing the AMD chip and Intel producing its own chip. Die size is 233 mm² for the AMD part and 215 mm² for the Intel part.

Memory support differs in type and bandwidth. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part, with no recorded figure for the Intel part. PCIe support differs: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ, with the Radeon 890M in the AMD chip and UHD Graphics 770 in the Intel chip. Market segments differ, with the AMD part classified as mobile and the Intel part as desktop.

Release dates differ by roughly two years, with the AMD part dated 2026 and the Intel part dated 2024. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $232, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The Intel part has a listed part number, SRN3P, while the AMD part's part number is unknown. The Intel part also has an average benchmark score of 28065 and an 80th percentile ranking, while the AMD part has an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. The codenames differ as well: Gorgon Point for AMD and Raptor Lake-R for Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500T holds the measured performance advantage in the database. Its 80th percentile ranking versus the AMD part's 50th percentile ranking indicates that the Intel processor outperforms a larger share of all CPUs in the database. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 28065, based on its recorded Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark results, gives it a clear edge in any comparison that relies on actual measured data. The Intel part's larger 24 MB L3 cache and higher L2 cache per core also support its position in workloads that benefit from larger cache pools.

The Intel Core i5-14500T's 14-core configuration with 20 threads gives it an advantage in heavily threaded tasks, although the AMD part's 24 threads from 12 cores could compete in thread-scalable workloads if measured scores were available. The Intel part's higher thermal design power of 35 W allows for more sustained power draw, which can support longer all-core boost behavior in desktop systems with adequate cooling. The Intel chip also supports PCIe Gen 5, which provides higher bandwidth for compatible peripherals and storage devices.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins on specifications that favor efficiency and platform flexibility. Its 28 W thermal design power is lower than the Intel part's 35 W, which suits compact mobile and embedded designs. The AMD chip's 5.10 GHz boost clock is higher than the Intel part's 4.80 GHz, which can benefit lightly threaded workloads that scale with maximum clock speed. The AMD part's support for LPDDR5X memory and its recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s give it a defined memory throughput advantage, though the Intel part has no recorded bandwidth figure to compare directly.

The AMD chip's newer 4 nm process from TSMC gives it a manufacturing geometry advantage over Intel's 10 nm process, which can translate to better power efficiency per operation. The AMD part's Radeon 890M integrated graphics is a more capable iGPU than Intel's UHD Graphics 770 for graphical workloads that rely on the integrated solution. The AMD part also supports PCIe Gen 4, which is sufficient for most current devices, while the Intel part's Gen 5 support is forward-looking.

For embedded and mobile use cases, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i offers lower power draw, a smaller process node, and a higher boost clock. For desktop workloads where measured performance is the primary criterion, the Intel Core i5-14500T delivers the only recorded benchmark scores in this comparison, and those scores place it among the 80th percentile of all CPUs. The database records no benchmark results for the AMD part, so any assessment of its workload performance remains speculative, while the Intel part's scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, Geekbench, and Passmark provide a complete measured profile.