AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core i3-14100T Comparison

# AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core i3-14100T

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and Intel Core i3-14100T occupy different corners of the processor market, one designed for mobile embedded systems with a 28 W TDP and the other a 35 W desktop part. The database records no shared benchmark runs between the two, so the comparison relies on their recorded specifications, the Core i3-14100T's benchmark scores, and the architectural differences that define each platform.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i3-14100T wins in any scenario where the software is limited to a few threads and relies on high single-core performance. Its recorded Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1639, combined with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, indicates strong performance for lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark single-thread score of 3498 further confirms this, placing it ahead of what the AMD part can likely achieve given its lower base clock and mobile-oriented design.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins in multi-threaded and heavily parallel workloads. With 12 cores and 24 threads versus the Intel's 4 cores and 8 threads, the AMD part has a clear structural advantage. The database shows the Core i3-14100T scores 11612 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, but the AMD's triple core count and 24 threads suggest it would outperform that figure substantially in rendering, compilation, or other parallel tasks. The AMD also wins in integrated graphics capability, featuring the Radeon 890M, which is a more capable GPU than the Intel UHD Graphics 730 for any visual or compute work that uses the iGPU.

For embedded and mobile deployments, the AMD part wins on power efficiency and platform integration. Its 28 W TDP is lower than the Intel's 35 W, and it supports LPDDR5X memory, which is designed for low-power mobile systems. The Intel part, being a desktop chip on Socket 1700, targets traditional desktop builds where power draw is less critical.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The core configuration uses a hybrid arrangement of full Zen 5 and dense Zen 5c cores, which allows the chip to balance performance and efficiency within its 28 W TDP envelope.

The Intel Core i3-14100T is based on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and uses Intel's 10 nm process node (a designation that refers to Intel's own naming convention). Its die size is 163 mm², and it uses the traditional Raptor Lake layout with performance cores only, no efficiency cores in this particular model. The Intel part is built at Intel's own foundry, while the AMD part is built at TSMC.

Cache configurations differ significantly. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 per core, but the AMD has 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is 16 MB on the AMD versus 12 MB shared on the Intel. The AMD's larger L3 and per-core L2 provide more on-die data for its 12 cores to share.

Memory support diverges sharply. The AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database does not record a bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory. The AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, designed for mobile embedded systems, while the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700 for desktop.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Intel's newer PCIe standard offers higher potential bandwidth for expansion devices, though the AMD's Gen 4 is sufficient for most embedded applications.

The integrated graphics are a major differentiator. The Radeon 890M in the AMD part is a modern integrated GPU based on RDNA architecture, while the Intel UHD Graphics 730 is a basic desktop iGPU. The AMD's iGPU is designed to handle more demanding visual workloads, while the Intel's is adequate for display output and light acceleration.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i3-14100T has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speeds?

A: The AMD boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel boosts to 4.40 GHz. The AMD has a higher maximum clock despite a lower base clock of 2.00 GHz versus the Intel's 2.70 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100T supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core i3-14100T support ECC memory.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD records 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The database does not record a bandwidth figure for the Intel part.

Q: Which processor has a lower TDP?

A: The AMD has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel has a TDP of 35 W.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i | Intel Core i3-14100T |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 12 | 4 |

| Threads | 24 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i3 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 12 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no direct head-to-head benchmark results in the database for these two processors. However, the Intel Core i3-14100T has a full set of recorded scores, and the AMD's architectural specifications allow for a reasoned comparison.

The Intel Core i3-14100T records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11612. Given that the AMD part has three times the cores and three times the threads, and both have similar boost clocks (5.10 GHz versus 4.40 GHz), the AMD's multi-core score would be expected to exceed the Intel's by a substantial margin, potentially in the range of two to three times higher. The exact figure is not recorded, but the core count difference is decisive for parallel workloads.

In single-core performance, the Intel part scores 1639 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3498 in PassMark single-thread. The AMD's higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is 0.70 GHz above the Intel's, indicates it likely matches or exceeds the Intel in single-threaded tasks. However, the Intel's higher base clock of 2.70 GHz versus 2.00 GHz suggests it may have an advantage in sustained low-load scenarios where boost clocks are not engaged.

The Intel's PassMark multi-thread score of 13662 and its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 4877 provide reference points. The AMD's 24 threads versus 8 threads would likely push its multi-threaded scores well beyond these figures, but without recorded data, this remains an inference from the core configuration.

The integrated graphics comparison is clearer. The Radeon 890M is a modern iGPU with significant compute capability, while the UHD Graphics 730 is a basic desktop unit. For any workload that uses the iGPU, the AMD part has a decisive advantage. The Intel part's PassMark physics score of 973 and floating-point math score of 31379 reflect CPU-only performance, not graphics.

The Intel part shows strong results in specific PassMark subtests: data compression at 152636, integer math at 40292, and extended instructions at 10414. These scores indicate solid general-purpose performance for a 4-core part. The AMD, with more cores, would likely outperform in integer math and data compression due to parallelization, but the exact numbers are not recorded.

The Verdict

The data indicates two different tools for two different jobs. The Intel Core i3-14100T is a desktop processor with a launch MSRP of $134, designed for low-power desktop builds where space and cooling are limited. Its 4 cores and 8 threads handle everyday tasks, office work, and light multi-threading adequately. Its recorded benchmark scores place it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, with close rivals like the Intel Core i3-13100F and AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE within 0.2 percent. It is a capable, efficient desktop part for basic systems.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is a mobile embedded processor with 12 cores and 24 threads, a 28 W TDP, and a 5.10 GHz boost clock. Its design targets embedded systems, laptops, and compact industrial platforms where multi-threaded performance and power efficiency matter. The Radeon 890M iGPU provides substantial graphics capability without a discrete card. The database records no benchmark scores for the AMD part, but the core and thread counts, along with the higher boost clock and lower TDP, indicate it delivers significantly higher multi-threaded throughput while consuming less power.

For a desktop user who needs a simple, low-cost CPU for everyday computing, the Intel Core i3-14100T is the recorded option with proven scores. For an embedded or mobile system that requires heavy multi-threading, a strong iGPU, and low power draw, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is the architectural choice. The Intel part has the advantage of a measured benchmark history; the AMD part has the advantage of raw core count and modern process technology. The selection depends entirely on the deployment environment, not on a single performance metric.