AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 9 273PQE Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and Intel Core 9 273PQE are both 12-core, 24-thread processors, but the data places them in different performance and market tiers. The Intel part carries a 93rd percentile ranking across all CPUs, while the AMD part sits at the 50th percentile. The Intel chip also has a recorded average benchmark score of 66099, whereas the AMD model has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This creates a clear asymmetry in the comparison: one processor has extensive measured results, the other only has architectural specifications. The following analysis uses the recorded data to examine where each processor stands.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no individual benchmark scores listed. All performance measurements in this comparison come from the Intel Core 9 273PQE. In Cinebench R15 multicore, the Intel processor scores 3950 points, and in single-core it scores 557. Moving to Cinebench R20, the multicore score rises to 16459, while single-core reaches 2323. The Cinebench R23 results show 39190 in multicore and 5532 in single-core. These scores indicate a strong multithreaded performer, especially in the R23 test where the multicore result is roughly seven times the single-core result.

PassMark results for the Intel chip cover several specialized workloads. Data compression scores 585752, which is the highest single recorded value in the dataset. Data encryption reaches 29636, and extended instructions score 38743. Floating point math hits 125546, while integer math reaches 164629. The multithread score is 46107, and the single-thread score is 4573. Random string sorting scores 53167, and physics processing scores 2754. The find prime numbers test yields a score of 198, the lowest recorded value. These numbers show a processor that excels in integer and floating point operations but has a relatively modest result in prime number searching, which often reflects specific instruction dependencies.

Because there are no AMD benchmark scores, the head-to-head comparison cannot produce wins for either side. The Intel processor's percentile rank of 93 versus the AMD processor's 50 suggests a substantial gap in overall performance, but this is inferred from the percentile field rather than direct side-by-side tests. The nearest rivals for the Intel chip reinforce its standing: the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus scores 66159, which is 0.1% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D scores 65914, which is 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus and AMD EPYC 4465P sit 1.1% and 1.2% higher respectively. These deltas show the Core 9 273PQE trading blows with high-end desktop parts, all within roughly one percent of each other.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename, belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, and is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 9 273PQE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, belongs to the Core 9 generation, and is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The die size for the AMD chip is recorded as 233 mm², while the Intel chip has no die size listed. The process node difference is notable: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which typically implies higher transistor density for the AMD part.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core for the AMD chip, but the Intel chip has 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The L3 cache shows a larger gap: the AMD processor has 16 MB of L3, while the Intel processor has 36 MB of shared L3. This 20 MB difference in L3 could affect workloads that rely on large working sets, though no benchmark data exists for the AMD part to confirm this.

Clock speeds also separate the two. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel base clock is 3.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.90 GHz. The Intel part starts higher and boosts higher, which aligns with its higher single-core benchmark scores. Power draw is another distinguishing factor: the AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 125 watts. The AMD part is clearly designed for low-power embedded scenarios, while the Intel part targets desktop performance with significantly higher power headroom.

Memory support and PCIe lanes also differ. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and both support ECC memory. The PCIe interface differs: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are different as well: the AMD processor uses Radeon 890M, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 770.

Where Each One Wins

The data suggests distinct usage scenarios for each processor, although only the Intel chip has recorded benchmark wins. The Intel Core 9 273PQE wins in every measured workload category because the AMD part has no benchmark entries. The strongest Intel results appear in data compression (585752), integer math (164629), and floating point math (125546). These scores point to productivity tasks like compression tools, spreadsheet calculations, and scientific computing where integer and floating point throughput matter. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39190 also indicates strong rendering performance, which would benefit video encoding, 3D modeling, and batch processing workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins on power efficiency by specification. Its 28 watt TDP is less than a quarter of the Intel chip's 125 watt TDP, making it suitable for fanless or compact embedded systems where thermal limits are strict. The 4 nm process node and lower base clock of 2.00 GHz support this efficiency profile. The AMD chip also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is common in low-power mobile and embedded designs, and its Radeon 890M integrated graphics may offer different media capabilities than Intel's UHD Graphics 770, though no benchmark scores confirm this.

The Intel chip wins on raw performance per the recorded data. Its boost clock of 5.90 GHz is 0.80 GHz higher than the AMD chip's 5.10 GHz, and its 36 MB L3 cache is more than double the AMD chip's 16 MB. The 93rd percentile ranking versus the 50th percentile ranking reinforces this advantage. The Intel chip also uses PCIe Gen 5, which doubles the theoretical bandwidth of the AMD chip's Gen 4 interface, affecting high-speed storage and GPU connectivity.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PQE has a boost clock of 5.90 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, and the Intel processor has a TDP of 125 watts, a difference of 97 watts.

Q: Does the Intel Core 9 273PQE support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is at the 50th percentile, while the Intel Core 9 273PQE is at the 93rd percentile.

Q: Which processor has a recorded average benchmark score?

A: Only the Intel Core 9 273PQE has an average benchmark score of 66099; the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark scores.

The Verdict

The data supports choosing the Intel Core 9 273PQE for workloads that demand high multithreaded and single-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39190, combined with a 93rd percentile rank, places it among top-tier desktop processors. The nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, sit within 1.2% of its average score, confirming that this Intel chip competes at the flagship level. The 125 watt TDP and desktop socket (Intel Socket 1700) indicate a system designed for sustained performance rather than portability.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is the appropriate choice for embedded or mobile applications where power consumption is the primary constraint. Its 28 watt TDP and 4 nm process node enable operation in thermally limited environments, and its support for LPDDR5X memory aligns with compact system designs. The 50th percentile ranking and absence of benchmark scores mean its performance ceiling is unknown from the data, but its specification profile suggests a focus on efficiency over absolute throughput. The PCIe Gen 4 interface and AMD Socket FP8 further indicate a platform optimized for embedded use cases, not high-end desktop builds.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i | Intel Core 9 273PQE |

|---------------|----------------------------|---------------------|

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not listed |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.90 GHz |

| TDP | 28 watts | 125 watts |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2026-03-08 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $589 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 93 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 66099 |