AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 350 carries the only benchmark data recorded in the database for this pairing. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no individual benchmark scores listed, and the head-to-head benchmark table is empty. As a result, the comparison is asymmetrical: the Intel part can be analyzed directly against its nearest rivals, while the AMD part must be assessed from its specification profile alone.

The Intel Core 7 350 posts an average benchmark score of 17779, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered. The Core 5 221TE scores 17860, a delta of -0.5% relative to the Core 7 350, meaning the rival is effectively at parity, just half a percent higher. The Core 5 120U scores 17898, a -0.7% delta. The AMD EPYC 9374F scores 17693, a +0.5% delta, putting it just below the Core 7 350. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT scores 17891, a -0.6% delta. These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the Core 7 350 sits in a very dense performance cluster where no single rival holds a meaningful edge.

Digging into the individual Cinebench results, the Core 7 350 delivers a multi-core score of 1220 in Cinebench R15 and a single-core score of 292. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core score rises to 5373 with a single-core score of 758. Cinebench R23 shows a multi-core score of 8030 and a single-core score of 2046. These scores demonstrate a substantial multi-core advantage over the single-core figures, roughly 4.2x in R15, 7.1x in R20, and 3.9x in R23, consistent with a 6-core, 6-thread design that relies on heavy parallel throughput.

PassMark results further characterize the Core 7 350. The multi-thread score is 15170, while the single-thread score is 4100. Integer math reaches 33734, floating point math reaches 42809, and extended instructions score 12045. Data compression scores 143123, data encryption scores 10933, and random string sorting scores 17238. Prime number finding scores just 107, and the physics score is 1173. These numbers indicate that the Core 7 350 excels at compression and sorting workloads, which are memory and cache sensitive, while lagging in prime number searches, a deeply integer-heavy and latency-bound operation.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Intel Core 7 350 is the only part with measurable performance. It occupies the 71st percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong position for a mobile processor. Its nearest rivals, all within -0.7% to +0.5% delta, confirm that it sits in a competitive band but does not break away from the pack. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no benchmark scores, no average score, and no percentile ranking beyond a neutral 50th percentile placeholder, which the database records as zero benchmark data.

Who should pick which? The data supports the Intel Core 7 350 for anyone seeking verified multi-core and single-core scores across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, plus a broad PassMark profile. Its 71st percentile ranking gives a concrete reference point. The AMD part, however, cannot be recommended based on measured performance because no such measurements exist in the database. Its specification sheet shows a higher core count, 12 cores and 24 threads versus 6 cores and 6 threads, and a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.80 GHz, but without benchmark scores, those specifications remain unvalidated. The verdict is straightforward: the Intel part has the data, the AMD part does not.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core 7 350's average benchmark score?

A: The recorded average benchmark score is 17779, with a percentile ranking of 71 among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 350 compare to its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 9374F?

A: The EPYC 9374F has an average score of 17693, which is a delta of +0.5% relative to the Core 7 350, meaning the Core 7 350 scores slightly higher.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the Intel Core 7 350?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 4100, and the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2046.

Q: What is the multi-thread performance of the Intel Core 7 350?

A: The PassMark multi-thread score is 15170, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 8030.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the AMD part, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 350 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 uses 6 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks differ: the AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz, the Intel part at 1.50 GHz. Boost clocks also differ: 5.10 GHz for AMD versus 4.80 GHz for Intel. Thermal design power differs significantly, with the AMD part rated at 28 watts and the Intel part at 15 watts.

Cache configurations are distinct. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is identical in type, both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but the memory bus differs: the AMD part is dual-channel with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part is single-channel with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. ECC memory support is present on the AMD part but absent on the Intel part. PCIe lanes differ as well, with the AMD part offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel part offering Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only).

Sockets are different: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1516. The integrated graphics differ, with the AMD part using Radeon 890M and the Intel part using Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe). The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $469; the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. The Intel part has a part number of SAE3F, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown. The Intel part has a release date recorded as 2026-04-15, while the AMD part's release date is 2026-02-28.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is built on a 4 nm process node from TSMC, with a codename of Gorgon Point and a generation label of Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). Its die size is 233 mm². The Intel Core 7 350 is built on a 3 nm process node from Intel, with a codename of Wildcat Lake and a generation label of Core 5 (Wildcat Lake). Its die size is not recorded in the database.

The core architectures differ fundamentally. The AMD part uses a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c arrangement, which combines performance cores with compact cores for efficiency. The Intel part uses a 6-core, 6-thread configuration with no hyperthreading, as indicated by the equal core and thread counts. The AMD part provides 24 threads from 12 cores, which implies simultaneous multithreading, while the Intel part provides one thread per core.

Cache architecture also reflects different design philosophies. The AMD part spreads 16 MB of L3 cache across the chip, while the Intel part uses 6 MB of shared L3. Per-core L1 and L2 allocations are larger on the Intel part, 192 KB and 2.5 MB respectively versus 80 KB and 1 MB on the AMD part, but the total cache pool is smaller because there are fewer cores. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the Intel part, and uses a dual-channel memory bus versus the Intel part's single-channel bus.

The manufacturing foundry differs: TSMC produces the AMD chip, Intel produces the Intel chip. The process nodes are close, 4 nm versus 3 nm, but the Intel node is denser. The AMD part has a larger die size at 233 mm², while the Intel die size is unrecorded. The integrated graphics differ as well, with AMD's Radeon 890M versus Intel's Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 350 wins in every measured category because it is the only part with benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8030 and single-core score of 2046 provide concrete reference points for rendering and single-threaded application performance. Its PassMark data compression score of 143123 indicates strong performance in archiving and file compression workloads. The random string sorting score of 17238 suggests solid handling of sorting algorithms. The floating point math score of 42809 and integer math score of 33734 show balanced general arithmetic throughput.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins on paper specifications alone. It offers 12 cores and 24 threads, double the core count and four times the thread count of the Intel part. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz is higher, and its dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth provides a theoretical memory throughput advantage of roughly 50% over the Intel part's 59.7 GB/s. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, which is absent on the Intel part, and carries a larger L3 cache at 16 MB versus 6 MB.

For use-case splits, the data supports the Intel part for any workload where measured scores exist: multi-core rendering, single-core responsiveness, compression, encryption, and physics calculations. The Intel part's 71st percentile ranking places it above most CPUs in the database. The AMD part, with no scores, cannot be assigned a use case based on measured performance. Its specification advantages, higher core count, higher boost clock, larger cache, and dual-channel memory, suggest potential in multi-threaded and memory-bandwidth-sensitive tasks, but those advantages are not validated by any recorded benchmark. The database's neutral 50th percentile placeholder for the AMD part reflects the absence of evidence, not evidence of absence.