AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a full benchmark suite for the Intel Core 7 150U, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numerical comparison one-sided. The Intel part delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8883 and a single-core score of 1875.5. In Cinebench R20, it records 5248 multi-core and 740 single-core. The R15 results show 1505.5 multi-core and 254 single-core. Geekbench results show 6234 multi-core and 1857 single-core.

PassMark results for the Intel part span several workloads. Multi-thread performance is 14700, while single-thread is 3508. Integer math scores 51057, floating-point math scores 34405, and extended instructions score 8748. Data compression results in 158622, data encryption in 10025, and random string sorting in 18269. Prime number finding records 58, and physics scores 1012.

The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, placing it at the 50th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel part, with an average score of 17395, sits at the 71st percentile. The Intel chip's nearest rivals in the database are AMD desktop parts: the Ryzen 5 4500 (average score 17333, 0.4% behind), the Ryzen 3 210 (17321, 0.4% behind), the Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (17482, 0.5% ahead), and the Ryzen 5 4600G (17507, 0.6% ahead). These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating that the Core 7 150U lands in a tightly packed performance tier among those desktop processors.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head comparison must rely on architectural specifications rather than measured scores. The database shows zero wins for the AMD part and zero wins for the Intel part in the head-to-head benchmark fields, confirming that no direct test results exist for this pairing.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing nodes. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 7 150U uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-U, and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. Its die size is not recorded in the database.

Core and thread counts differ significantly. The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part has 10 cores and 12 threads. This gives the AMD chip a 2-core and 12-thread advantage, a substantial difference for heavily threaded workloads. The AMD part's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Cache hierarchies show structural differences. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB per core. For L3, the AMD part has 16 MB total, whereas the Intel part has 12 MB shared. The AMD chip's larger L3 pool, combined with more cores and threads, suggests an advantage in cache-sensitive workloads.

The process node gap is notable: 4 nm versus 10 nm. This typically implies differences in power efficiency and transistor density, though the database does not record transistor counts for either chip. The Intel part's 10 nm process is an older node, while the AMD part benefits from TSMC's more advanced 4 nm manufacturing.

Memory support also differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. The AMD part supports ECC memory; the Intel part does not.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). This gives the AMD chip double the PCIe lane count, which matters for discrete GPUs or high-speed storage expansion.

Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses Radeon 890M, while the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The database does not record graphics benchmark scores for either, so a performance comparison cannot be quantified.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 150U has measurable wins because it has recorded benchmark data. Its 71st percentile ranking versus the AMD part's 50th percentile (based on an average score of 0) shows that the Intel chip outperforms the AMD chip in the database's overall scoring, though this comparison is skewed by the AMD part's lack of test results.

For single-threaded performance, the Intel part's boost clock of 5.40 GHz exceeds the AMD part's 5.10 GHz. The recorded Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1875.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 1857 indicate strong per-core capability. The PassMark single-thread score of 3508 reinforces this. The Intel part's 10 cores and 12 threads are fewer, but its higher boost clock suggests a potential edge in lightly threaded tasks such as web browsing, office applications, and legacy software that relies on single-core speed.

The AMD part wins on paper in several architectural categories. Its 12 cores and 24 threads double the thread count of the Intel part's 12 threads. This should translate to a decisive advantage in multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and compilation, assuming the AMD chip's clock speeds hold up. The base clock of 2.00 GHz versus 1.80 GHz means the AMD part starts from a higher frequency across all cores. The 16 MB L3 cache versus 12 MB provides more shared cache for data-intensive tasks. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, which the Intel part lacks a recorded figure for, suggests a memory throughput advantage. The 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 8 lanes gives the AMD part more headroom for I/O expansion. ECC memory support makes the AMD part suitable for error-sensitive embedded workloads, a feature the Intel part lacks.

The AMD part's 4 nm process versus Intel's 10 nm implies better power efficiency per transistor, though the AMD part's TDP is 28 W versus the Intel part's 15 W. The AMD chip consumes more power but likely delivers more aggregate compute. The Intel part's lower TDP makes it more suited to fanless or low-power designs.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 7 150U has 10 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the recorded benchmark scores for the AMD part?

A: The database shows no recorded benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it sits at the 50th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 150U compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel part scores 17395 on average. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 4500, scores 17333, which is 0.4% lower. The AMD Ryzen 3 210 also scores 17321, 0.4% lower. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE scores 17482, 0.5% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G scores 17507, 0.6% higher.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, but its bandwidth is not recorded.

Q: Do these processors support ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 150U does not.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD part is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel part is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i | Intel Core 7 150U |

|---------------|----------------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 10 |

| Threads | 24 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-U |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 7 (Raptor Lake-U) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRMYP |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 71 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 17395 |