AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 5 320 Comparison

The database contains no paired benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core 5 320. The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 0 and no individual benchmark scores, while the Intel Core 5 320 has a recorded average benchmark score of 18023. That places the Intel part at the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part is listed at the 50th percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Without paired results, the comparison is one-sided. The Intel Core 5 320 records Cinebench R15 multicore 1054 and single-core 276, Cinebench R20 multicore 5462 and single-core 771, and Cinebench R23 multicore 6197 and single-core 1926. Passmark results include data compression 148779, data encryption 10984, extended instructions 13262, find prime numbers 110, floating point math 42440, integer math 32323, multithread 15450, physics 1221, random string sorting 18038, and single thread 4045.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no corresponding scores in the database, so no AMD win can be measured in any of these workloads. The recorded win count is 0 for both parts, but that is not a measured tie. It reflects the absence of AMD benchmark data. The Intel part is the only one with verified scores across the recorded Cinebench and Passmark tests.

The Verdict

Strictly from the recorded data, the Intel Core 5 320 is the only processor in this comparison with verified performance. Its average score of 18023 and 72nd percentile placement give it a concrete position among all CPUs. The nearest rival comparisons reinforce that position: it is 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (score 17994), 0.7% above the Intel Core 5 120U (score 17898), 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT (score 17891), and 0.7% below the Intel Core i5-1334U (score 18154).

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no benchmark scores, no rival comparisons, and an average benchmark score of 0. Its 50th percentile placement is the only relative ranking in the database. A data-driven selection therefore points to the Intel Core 5 320. The AMD part can be described by its specifications, but those specifications are not measured performance.

Architecture Differences

AMD uses the Gorgon Point codename and the Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) generation label. The process node is 4 nm at TSMC, and the die size is 233 mm². Intel uses the Wildcat Lake codename and the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation label. The process node is 3 nm at Intel, and no die size is listed.

The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. The Intel part has 6 cores and 6 threads, with 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. Both processors support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. AMD uses a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth; Intel uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s.

AMD supports ECC memory, while Intel does not. AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. AMD integrates Radeon 890M graphics; Intel integrates Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe.

Specification Differences

The table below lists the fields where the two parts differ.

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i | Intel Core 5 320 |

|---|---|---|

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | Not listed |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Codename / generation | Gorgon Point, Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Wildcat Lake, Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) |

| Core / thread count | 12 / 24 | 6 / 6 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2.5 MB |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC memory | True | False |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 890M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) |

| Release date | 2026-02-28 | 2026-04-15 |

| Part number | Unknown | SAE3H |

Both parts list DDR5 and LPDDR5X support, mobile market segment, active production status, and locked multipliers, so those fields are not included in the table.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database has no individual benchmark scores for the AMD part, and its average benchmark score is 0. The Intel Core 5 320 has recorded Cinebench and Passmark scores.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 320 compare with its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core 5 320 has an average score of 18023. It is 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (17994), 0.7% above the Intel Core 5 120U (17898), 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT (17891), and 0.7% below the Intel Core i5-1334U (18154).

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: Which part supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD part lists ECC memory support as true. The Intel part lists ECC memory support as false.

Q: What is the Intel Core 5 320's launch MSRP?

A: $340.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each part support?

A: AMD lists 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel bus. Intel lists 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel bus. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Where Each One Wins

Measured workload wins belong entirely to the Intel Core 5 320. Its Cinebench and Passmark scores cover multicore, single-core, compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, multithread, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread workloads. The AMD part has no recorded scores in any of these categories.

The AMD part does have specification-side advantages: 12 cores and 24 threads, a 5.10 boost clock, 16 MB of L3, 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, ECC support, 16 Gen 4 CPU lanes, and Radeon 890M graphics. The Intel part has a lower 15 W TDP and a 3 nm process node. Those are specification differences, not measured benchmark wins.

For measured performance, the Intel Core 5 320 is the only part with supporting data. For platform features such as ECC, wider memory bandwidth, and more PCIe lanes, the AMD part carries the specification lead, but the database does not verify its actual performance.