AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 5 220H Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and Intel Core 5 220H are both 12-core mobile processors, yet the recorded data positions them very differently. The Intel Core 5 220H carries a full set of benchmark scores and a percentile ranking of 80, placing it above most CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. This guide walks through the measurable performance of the Intel part, the architectural differences between the two, and the implications for workload selection based solely on the available data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are unavailable because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. All measurable performance data belongs to the Intel Core 5 220H. The Intel part’s Cinebench results show a strong multi-core showing: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 11198, while single-core scores 1853. The R20 run records 7812 multi-core and 1102 single-core, and the R15 run logs 1835 multi-core and 262 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that scales well across all cores, with the multi-core scores consistently about six times the single-core figures in each Cinebench version.

PassMark results reinforce the Intel part’s strengths. The multithread score of 21884 and the single-thread score of 3405 point to balanced performance. In specific workloads, integer math scores 73555, floating point math scores 51671, and extended instructions score 14642. Data compression scores 247921, while data encryption scores 15216. Random string sorting logs 28438, physics scores 1478, and finding prime numbers scores 82. The average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 220H is 28574, which places it in the 80th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Intel Core 5 220H is essentially neck-and-neck. The AMD EPYC 7203P averages 28583, a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS averages 28549, a delta of 0.1 percent. The Intel Xeon E-2436 averages 28530, a delta of 0.2 percent. The Intel Core i5-12600 averages 28646, a delta of -0.3 percent. These deltas are tiny, so the Core 5 220H neither dominates nor trails its closest competitors by any meaningful margin. The data shows a processor that sits squarely in a competitive cluster, with no single rival holding a decisive edge.

Because the AMD part has no scores, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The Intel part’s recorded performance is the only measurable data. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i may perform differently, but without benchmark results, no quantitative comparison is possible. The database records zero wins for the AMD part and zero wins for the Intel part in head-to-head tests, reflecting the absence of paired data.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has an empty benchmarks array and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile ranking is 50, but no individual test results are recorded.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 220H perform in single-core versus multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H shows consistent scaling. In Cinebench R23, single-core scores 1853 and multi-core scores 11198, a ratio of roughly six to one. The same pattern appears in R20 (1102 single, 7812 multi) and R15 (262 single, 1835 multi).

Q: What is the Intel Core 5 220H’s percentile ranking and average score?

A: The Intel Core 5 220H ranks in the 80th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 28574.

Q: Which rivals are closest to the Intel Core 5 220H in average score?

A: The nearest rivals are the AMD EPYC 7203P (28583, 0 percent delta), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS (28549, 0.1 percent delta), Intel Xeon E-2436 (28530, 0.2 percent delta), and Intel Core i5-12600 (28646, -0.3 percent delta).

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 5 220H?

A: The launch MSRP is $342.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i have a launch MSRP?

A: No. The launch MSRP field for the AMD part is null.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear choice for users who need measurable performance: the Intel Core 5 220H. It has a full set of benchmark scores, an average score of 28574, and an 80th percentile ranking. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded scores, meaning its performance cannot be verified or compared from the database. Any user relying on benchmark data would select the Intel part, as it is the only one with proven results.

For users who prioritize architectural features, the AMD part offers certain specifications that the Intel part lacks. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 5 220H does not. The AMD part also lists a smaller process node, 4 nm versus 10 nm, and a higher boost clock, 5.10 GHz versus 4.90 GHz. However, these specifications do not translate into recorded performance data. The Intel part’s benchmark scores are the sole quantitative evidence of performance, and they show a capable processor that competes evenly with its nearest rivals.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 220H has 12 cores and 16 threads. The AMD part’s base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel part’s base clock is 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The AMD part has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 45 watts. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1744.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. ECC memory is supported on the AMD part but not on the Intel part. The PCIe configuration also differs: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ, with the AMD part featuring Radeon 890M and the Intel part featuring Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. The AMD part’s release date is recorded as 2026-02-28, while the Intel part’s release date is 2024-12-17. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $342, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The architectural differences are substantial. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². Its codename is Gorgon Point, and its generation is listed as Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). The Intel Core 5 220H uses a 10 nm process at Intel, with the architecture identified as Raptor Lake and the codename Raptor Lake-H. The Intel part’s generation is listed as Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh). The Intel part has no recorded die size.

Cache layouts also differ. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part’s cache structure is per-core for L2, while the Intel part’s L3 is shared. Neither part has 3D V-Cache. The AMD part’s process node advantage, 4 nm versus 10 nm, suggests a denser transistor layout, though transistor counts are not recorded for either part.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 220H wins on measurable performance. Every benchmark score in the database belongs to the Intel part. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11198 and single-core score of 1853, along with its PassMark multithread score of 21884 and single-thread score of 3405, demonstrate verified capability across both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. The Intel part also holds a higher percentile ranking, 80 versus 50, and a higher average benchmark score, 28574 versus 0. For any user who requires confirmed performance numbers, the Intel part is the only defensible choice.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins on specific architectural features. It offers ECC memory support, which the Intel part lacks. Its memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, a figure the Intel part does not have. The AMD part uses a smaller 4 nm process, which typically indicates better power efficiency, though no efficiency benchmarks are recorded. The AMD part also has more threads, 24 versus 16, and a higher boost clock, 5.10 GHz versus 4.90 GHz. These features could matter for certain embedded or server-style workloads, but the database provides no scores to confirm an actual performance advantage.

The Intel Core 5 220H also wins on availability of data. Its release date of 2024-12-17 is earlier than the AMD part’s 2026-02-28, and it has a launch MSRP of $342, while the AMD part has none. The Intel part’s part number is recorded as SRQ6SQ5MM, while the AMD part’s part number is unknown. In the absence of AMD benchmark results, the Intel part stands as the only processor with a complete performance profile. Users who need verified multi-core and single-core results should look to the Intel Core 5 220H. Users who prioritize ECC support and a smaller process node, and who are willing to accept unverified performance, may consider the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i.