AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Core 5 211TE provides a complete benchmark profile, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no benchmark scores in the database. This absence of measured performance data for the AMD part shapes the comparison: the Intel processor's scores stand as the only quantitative evidence available.

The Intel Core 5 211TE posts a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12201 and a single-core score of 1722. In Cinebench R20, it records 5124 multicore and 723 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 workload shows 1229 multicore and 173 single-core. These results indicate a processor that scales reasonably across threaded workloads, with the multicore lead over its own single-core score confirming that all 10 cores and 16 threads contribute meaningfully under load.

PassMark results for the Intel part show a multithread score of 11685 and a single-thread score of 1408. Integer math reaches 33991, floating point math reaches 26150, and extended instructions score 8615. Data compression scores 133434, data encryption scores 7231, and random string sorting scores 14838. Find prime numbers records 72, and the physics test scores 1278. The spread between integer and floating point math suggests balanced execution, while the compression result stands out as the strongest relative showing in the PassMark suite.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i lacks recorded benchmark scores, direct head-to-head deltas cannot be computed. The database shows zero wins for each processor in head-to-head testing. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 15370 places it at the 69th percentile among all CPUs, with its nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 7543 at 15477 (0.7% ahead of the Intel chip), the AMD EPYC 7702P at 15130 (1.6% behind), the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U at 15682 (2% ahead), and the Intel Core i3-1315U at 15022 (2.3% behind). This places the Core 5 211TE in a tight cluster where the largest measured gap to a rival is just over two percentage points.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks for the AMD processor, while the Intel Core 5 211TE has 17 recorded benchmark results across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 5 211TE has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed ranges for the two processors?

A: The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor has the higher thermal design power?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has a TDP of 45, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a TDP of 28.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 211TE compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: Its average score of 15370 is 0.7% below the AMD EPYC 7543, 1.6% above the AMD EPYC 7702P, 2% below the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U, and 2.3% above the Intel Core i3-1315U.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 5 211TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm². These process differences indicate that the AMD design targets denser transistor packing, though the database does not list transistor counts for either part to quantify the gap.

Cache configurations differ structurally. The AMD processor allocates 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor also allocates 80 KB of L1 per core but uses 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. The Intel part therefore carries more L3 cache overall and a larger per-core L2 allocation, while the AMD part compensates with a higher core count.

Integrated graphics separate the two designs. The AMD processor uses a Radeon 890M, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 730. The database does not provide benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so relative graphics capability cannot be quantified. PCIe support also differs: the AMD part offers Gen 4 with 16 CPU-only lanes, while the Intel part offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. The Intel platform's newer PCIe generation provides higher theoretical bandwidth to compatible devices.

Memory bandwidth figures favor the AMD processor, which records 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the Intel part. Both support ECC memory, and both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part supports LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5, while the Intel part adds DDR4 compatibility, giving each platform access to different memory ecosystems.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ: 12 cores and 24 threads for AMD versus 10 cores and 16 threads for Intel. Clock speeds differ as well, with the AMD part's 2.00 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost exceeding the Intel part's 1.70 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. Thermal design power differs substantially: 28 for the AMD processor versus 45 for the Intel processor.

Process node and foundry differ: 4 nm at TSMC for AMD, 10 nm at Intel for Intel. Die sizes are close but not identical: 233 mm² for AMD, 215 mm² for Intel. Socket compatibility differs completely: AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD part, Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part.

Cache allocations differ in L2 and L3: 1 MB per core L2 and 16 MB L3 for AMD, versus 1.25 MB per core L2 and 20 MB shared L3 for Intel. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core. Memory support differs in type: DDR5 and LPDDR5X for AMD, DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. Memory bandwidth favors AMD at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. PCIe generation differs: Gen 4 for AMD, Gen 5 for Intel, both with 16 CPU-only lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 890M for AMD, UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. Market segments differ: Mobile for AMD, Desktop for Intel. Release dates differ: the AMD part is recorded as 2026-02-28, while the Intel part is recorded as 2025-01-12. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221 and a part number of SRQDL. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP and its part number is listed as unknown. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: the Intel Core 5 211TE is the only one of the two processors with measured performance in the database, and its results place it at the 69th percentile among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 15370. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has no recorded benchmark scores, no average score, and sits at the 50th percentile by default. Any performance comparison between the two must therefore rely on architectural specifications rather than direct measurements.

From a specification standpoint, the AMD processor offers more cores and threads, higher base and boost clocks, lower TDP, and higher memory bandwidth. The Intel processor offers more L3 cache, larger per-core L2, PCIe Gen 5, and a recorded performance baseline. The Intel part's nearest rival comparisons show it performing within roughly two percentage points of several server and mobile processors, which gives context for its measured scores.

The absence of AMD benchmark data means the database cannot confirm whether the AMD part's architectural advantages translate into measured wins. The Intel part's 12201 Cinebench R23 multicore score and 1722 single-core score stand as the only concrete performance figures available. The verdict is therefore conditional on data availability: the Intel processor has verified performance credentials, while the AMD processor's capabilities remain unquantified in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211TE wins in every category where measured data exists, because the AMD processor has none. The Intel part's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 12201 and PassMark multithread score of 11685 establish a measured baseline for threaded workloads. Its single-core scores of 1722 in Cinebench R23 and 1408 in PassMark provide a reference for lightly threaded tasks. The data compression score of 133434 stands as the strongest PassMark result for the Intel part, suggesting particular strength in compression workloads. Its average benchmark score of 15370 and 69th percentile ranking confirm that it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i wins on paper in several specification categories. Its 12 cores and 24 threads exceed the Intel part's 10 cores and 16 threads. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock exceeds the Intel part's 4.80 GHz. Its 28 TDP is lower than the Intel part's 45, indicating a more power-efficient design envelope. Its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth exceeds the Intel part's 76.8 GB/s. Its 4 nm process node is smaller than the Intel part's 10 nm. These advantages are real in the specification sheet but carry no measured performance confirmation.

The Intel processor also wins on platform features in some respects. Its PCIe Gen 5 support exceeds the AMD part's Gen 4. Its 20 MB of shared L3 exceeds the AMD part's 16 MB. Its DDR4 compatibility adds flexibility for systems using older memory. Its recorded release date of 2025-01-12 predates the AMD part's 2026-02-28, meaning it has been available longer.

The AMD processor wins on efficiency-oriented specifications. Its lower TDP of 28 versus 45 suggests it can operate in thermally constrained environments. Its LPDDR5X support enables low-power memory configurations. Its mobile market segment indicates design intent for embedded and portable applications, while the Intel part targets desktop use. The database records the AMD part at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, but this figure carries no benchmark weight since no scores exist to support it. The Intel part's 69th percentile, by contrast, is backed by 17 recorded benchmark results.