AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i vs Intel Core 3 100UL Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two processors aimed at entirely different segments, with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i holding a substantial structural advantage. The AMD part is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor with a 5.10 GHz boost clock and a 28 W TDP. The Intel Core 3 100UL is a 6-core, 8-thread desktop processor with a 4.50 GHz boost clock and a 15 W TDP. Benchmark results indicate the AMD part is designed for high-throughput, AI-adjacent embedded workloads, while the Intel part targets low-power, space-constrained desktop applications.

The database lists both processors at the 50th percentile for performance versus all CPUs and both have an average benchmark score of 0. This means the recorded measurements show no performance separation in the current dataset. When benchmark data is absent, the architectural specifications become the primary differentiator. The AMD part offers double the cores, triple the threads, and a higher boost clock. The Intel part counters with a lower TDP, which suggests a lower thermal envelope for passive or fanless cooling solutions.

For users prioritizing raw multi-threaded throughput, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is the clear choice based on its core and thread counts. For users prioritizing power efficiency and a desktop socket, the Intel Core 3 100UL is the only option that matches those constraints. Neither processor has a launch MSRP listed in the database, so any cost comparison is impossible from the recorded data.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses the Gorgon Point codename, which falls under the Ryzen AI Embedded generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. This heterogeneous core design allows the processor to mix high-performance Zen 5 cores with high-efficiency Zen 5c cores, enabling the 12-core, 24-thread configuration within a 28 W TDP. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The die size is recorded at 233 mm².

The Intel Core 3 100UL uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename. It relies on a homogeneous core design with 6 cores and 8 threads, which indicates a hybrid arrangement of performance cores and efficiency cores, but the database does not specify the exact mix. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel. No die size is recorded for the Intel part.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. Both processors feature an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache shows a major divergence: the AMD part has 16 MB, while the Intel part has 10 MB shared. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, a feature absent on the Intel part.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is recorded for the Intel part. PCIe lanes also differ: the AMD part provides 16 Gen 4 lanes, while the Intel part provides 8 Gen 4 lanes.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD part uses the Radeon 890M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 64EU. The market segment for the AMD part is mobile, while the Intel part is classified as desktop. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 3 100UL has 6 cores and 8 threads. The AMD part offers double the cores and triple the threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 100UL boosts to 4.50 GHz. The AMD part has a 0.60 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 3 100UL does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core 3 100UL has a TDP of 15 W. The Intel part draws less power.

Q: Which socket does each processor use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core 3 100UL uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 100UL has 10 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every key specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 3 100UL has 6 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks differ: 2.00 GHz for the AMD part versus 1.20 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks differ: 5.10 GHz versus 4.50 GHz.

The TDP differs: 28 W for the AMD part versus 15 W for the Intel part. The sockets differ: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. The codenames differ: Gorgon Point versus Raptor Lake-PS. The generations differ: Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) versus Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS).

The process nodes differ: 4 nm from TSMC versus 10 nm from Intel. The foundries differ: TSMC versus Intel. The die size is recorded as 233 mm² for the AMD part, while no die size is recorded for the Intel part. The L2 cache differs: 1 MB per core for the AMD part versus 1.25 MB per core for the Intel part. The L3 cache differs: 16 MB versus 10 MB shared.

Memory support differs: DDR5 and LPDDR5X for the AMD part versus DDR4 and DDR5 for the Intel part. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part, while no bandwidth is recorded for the Intel part. ECC support differs: true for the AMD part, false for the Intel part. PCIe lanes differ: 16 Gen 4 lanes versus 8 Gen 4 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 890M versus UHD Graphics 64EU. The market segment differs: mobile versus desktop. The release dates differ: 2026-02-28 for the AMD part versus 2024-04-07 for the Intel part. Both processors have locked multipliers and are in active production.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark dataset is empty, and the wins counters show 0 wins for each processor. This means the database contains no recorded performance measurements that directly compare the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i and the Intel Core 3 100UL. Both processors also carry an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking versus all CPUs.

Without benchmark scores, the analysis relies on the recorded specifications. The AMD part shows a clear advantage in multi-threaded capability. With 24 threads versus 8 threads, the AMD part can process three times as many concurrent threads. The higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz versus 4.50 GHz also indicates a faster single-thread ceiling, though the actual performance depends on the core architecture.

The Intel part shows an advantage in power draw. The 15 W TDP is nearly half of the AMD part's 28 W TDP. This lower power envelope allows for simpler cooling solutions and lower operating costs in always-on embedded or desktop systems. The Intel part also supports DDR4 memory, which can be a cost-effective option in existing systems, though the database does not record pricing.

The memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part indicates a substantial data throughput capability, which is essential for AI workloads and integrated graphics performance. The Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth, so no comparison is possible on that metric.

The cache configuration favors the AMD part. The 16 MB L3 cache is 60% larger than the Intel part's 10 MB shared L3 cache. The AMD part's larger L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data. The Intel part has a slightly larger L2 cache per core, 1.25 MB versus 1 MB, which can benefit single-core workloads that fit within the L2.

The PCIe lane count favors the AMD part, with 16 Gen 4 lanes versus 8 Gen 4 lanes for the Intel part. This allows the AMD part to support more PCIe devices or higher-bandwidth devices such as discrete GPUs and NVMe storage.

The integrated graphics solutions differ, with the AMD part using the Radeon 890M and the Intel part using UHD Graphics 64EU. The database does not record any graphics benchmark scores, so the relative GPU performance cannot be quantified.

The production status for both processors is active, and both have locked multipliers. The AMD part has a newer release date, 2026-02-28, compared to the Intel part's 2024-04-07. The market segment classification places the AMD part in mobile and the Intel part in desktop, which reflects their intended use cases.

The recorded data shows no performance separation, but the specification sheet clearly indicates the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185i is the more powerful processor on paper, while the Intel Core 3 100UL is the more power-efficient desktop option.