AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core 9 273PE Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core 9 273PE represent two distinct approaches to high-performance computing, one aimed at embedded mobile workloads and the other at desktop processing. Direct benchmark comparisons are not recorded in the database for this pair, so the analysis relies on the available benchmark results for the Intel part and the architectural specifications for both. The Intel Core 9 273PE shows a strong performance profile, with an average benchmark score of 49845 and a percentile ranking of 90 among all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i holds a percentile ranking of 50, indicating a mid-range position in the broader database, though it lacks recorded benchmark scores for direct comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, meaning there are no direct measured comparisons between them. The analysis must therefore focus on the recorded scores for the Intel Core 9 273PE and the architectural specifications of the AMD part to infer relative performance. The Intel Core 9 273PE delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31288 and a single-core score of 4417. In Cinebench R20, it scores 13140 multicore and 1855 single-core, while in Cinebench R15 it reaches 3153 multicore and 445 single-core. These scores place the Intel chip in the 90th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

The Intel Core 9 273PE also shows strong results in PassMark tests. Its multithread score is 36810, with a single-thread score of 3650. In specific workloads, it achieves 139410 in integer math, 107884 in floating-point math, and 405885 in data compression. Data encryption scores 22719, extended instructions reach 24630, and random string sorting hits 45098. Physics processing scores 3120, and prime number finding scores 203. These numbers indicate a processor that handles both integer and floating-point tasks with considerable throughput.

Comparing the Intel part to its nearest rivals in the database provides context. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has an average score of 49796, which is 0.1% behind the Intel Core 9 273PE. The Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49394, 0.9% behind. The Intel Core i9-13980HX scores 50398, putting it 1.1% ahead of the Core 9 273PE. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 scores 50448, 1.2% ahead. These close margins show that the Core 9 273PE sits in a competitive tier where differences between adjacent processors are small, under two percentage points in either direction.

The absence of benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i means its performance cannot be quantified against the Intel part. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests it sits at the median of the database, but without scores, no direct numeric comparison is possible. The data indicates that the Intel Core 9 273PE is a high-performing desktop processor, while the AMD part is an embedded processor with a lower overall ranking, but the lack of head-to-head measurements limits the precision of this comparison.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in architecture, process technology, and intended platform. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 9 273PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. Its die size is not recorded in the database.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 12 cores and 24 threads. This gives the Intel processor a 50% advantage in core count and thread count. Base and boost clocks also favor Intel: the AMD chip runs at 2.00 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost, while the Intel chip runs at 2.30 GHz base and 5.70 GHz boost. The Intel part has a higher top frequency by 0.70 GHz.

Cache layouts reveal different design philosophies. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel provides 2 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a larger gap. The AMD part has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel part has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. This 28 MB difference gives Intel a significant advantage in cache capacity, which can benefit workloads with large working sets.

Memory support also differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus and offer 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and both support ECC memory. The AMD part is limited to PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, doubling the potential I/O bandwidth for compatible devices.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses the Radeon 880M, while the Intel Core 9 273PE uses the UHD Graphics 730. The database does not include benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so their relative graphics performance cannot be quantified. The market segments differ: AMD targets mobile with its embedded processor, while Intel targets desktop. Power consumption also diverges, with the AMD part rated at 28 watts TDP and the Intel part at 65 watts TDP, a difference of 37 watts. The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses the Intel Socket 1700. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither supports user overclocking. The Intel part has a recorded part number of SA4QD, while the AMD part has an unknown part number. The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $549, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD processor.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PE wins in scenarios that benefit from high core counts, high cache capacity, and high clock speeds. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with 36 MB of shared L3 cache and a 5.70 GHz boost clock, make it suited for multithreaded desktop workloads such as video rendering, software compilation, and scientific simulations. The recorded Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31288 and PassMark multithread score of 36810 support this interpretation. The 2 MB per core L2 cache and the larger L3 cache likely help with data-heavy tasks that require frequent cache hits.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i wins in scenarios where power efficiency and compact integration matter more than raw throughput. Its 28 watts TDP is 37 watts lower than the Intel part, which makes it suitable for embedded systems, thin-and-light mobile devices, and fanless or low-thermal designs. The support for LPDDR5X memory and the Radeon 880M integrated graphics position it for applications that need unified memory access and capable onboard graphics in a mobile form factor. Its 4 nm process at TSMC, compared to Intel's 10 nm process, suggests a denser, possibly more efficient transistor design, though the database does not record power efficiency benchmarks.

The Intel part also wins in I/O throughput scenarios due to PCIe Gen 5 support, which provides higher bandwidth for storage devices and GPUs compared to the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4. The Intel processor's desktop market segment and Socket 1700 compatibility indicate it is designed for systems where space and power constraints are less restrictive. The AMD processor's mobile segment and Socket FP8 indicate a focus on embedded and portable applications where the 28 watts TDP is a defining characteristic.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part has 4 more cores and 8 more threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 9 273PE has a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Intel part is 0.70 GHz higher.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core 9 273PE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 28 MB more L3 cache.

Q: What memory types are supported by each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core 9 273PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both support ECC memory and use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 9 273PE has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD part consumes 37 watts less.

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core 9 273PE?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has an average benchmark score of 49845 and ranks in the 90th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388, scores 49796, which is 0.1% lower.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.30 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 5.70 GHz for Intel. TDP is 28 watts for AMD and 65 watts for Intel. Sockets are AMD Socket FP8 for AMD and Intel Socket 1700 for Intel. Codename is Gorgon Point for AMD and Bartlett Lake for Intel. Generations are Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) for AMD and Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) for Intel. Process nodes are 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. Foundries are TSMC for AMD and Intel for Intel. Die size is 233 mm² for AMD and not recorded for Intel. L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 36 MB shared for Intel. Memory support is DDR5 and LPDDR5X for AMD, and DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD, and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 880M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. Market segments are Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. Part number is unknown for AMD and SA4QD for Intel. Launch MSRP is not recorded for AMD and $549 for Intel.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear split in intended use cases. The Intel Core 9 273PE is the stronger choice for desktop workloads that demand high multithreaded performance, large cache capacity, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. Its recorded benchmark scores, including a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31288 and a PassMark multithread score of 36810, place it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are within 1.2% of its average score, indicating it competes at a high level. The 12 cores, 24 threads, 36 MB of shared L3 cache, and 5.70 GHz boost clock all support this positioning.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i is the more appropriate choice for embedded and mobile systems where power consumption is a primary constraint. Its 28 watts TDP is 37 watts lower than the Intel part, and its support for LPDDR5X memory and the Radeon 880M integrated graphics make it suited for compact, integrated designs. The 4 nm process node and 233 mm² die size indicate a modern manufacturing approach, but the absence of recorded benchmarks and the 50th percentile ranking limit any quantitative performance claims. Users who need maximum processing power should select the Intel Core 9 273PE. Users who prioritize low power and embedded form factors should select the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i. The database does not support a direct performance comparison between the two, so the decision rests on the distinct architectural and specification differences recorded here.