AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core 9 273PE Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 130
Core 9 273PE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5 130 vs Intel Core 9 273PE
The Verdict
The data distinguishes these two processors sharply by market segment and workload. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 is a mobile part with 6 cores, 12 threads, and a 28 W TDP, built on TSMC's 6 nm node with Zen 3+ architecture. The Intel Core 9 273PE is a desktop part with 12 cores, 24 threads, and a 65 W TDP, built on Intel's 10 nm node with Bartlett Lake architecture. The database records no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 5 130, while the Intel Core 9 273PE has a substantial benchmark suite and an average benchmark score of 49845, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel part also carries a launch MSRP of $549, stated once here. From the recorded data, the Intel Core 9 273PE is the only one of the two with measured performance results, so any selection based on the database favors the Intel part for users needing verified multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no recorded scores, so its position in the database is undefined relative to the Intel processor. Users requiring a mobile processor with lower power draw (28 W TDP) would look to the AMD part, but the data cannot quantify its performance. Users requiring a desktop processor with proven benchmark results, a 90th percentile ranking, and 24 threads would select the Intel Core 9 273PE.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the codename Rembrandt-R, fabricated on a 6 nm process by TSMC. Its die size is 210 mm². The Intel Core 9 273PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename with a 10 nm process fabricated by Intel. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 12 cores and 24 threads. Cache configurations differ significantly. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 9 273PE provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has more than double the L3 cache and four times the L2 cache per core. Clock speeds also differ: the AMD part has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.55 GHz, while the Intel part has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The Intel boost clock is 1.15 GHz higher. Power envelopes diverge sharply, with the AMD part rated at 28 W TDP and the Intel part at 65 W TDP. Socket compatibility differs: the AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel Core 9 273PE uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is classified as mobile, the Intel part as desktop. Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD part supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, which is 12.8 GB/s higher. PCIe capabilities differ: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD Ryzen 5 130 uses Radeon 660M, while the Intel Core 9 273PE uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part's generation is listed as Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)), and the Intel part's generation is Core 9 (Bartlett Lake). Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part number is 100-000000992 (FP7r2), and the Intel part number is SA4QD.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen 5 130 and the Intel Core 9 273PE. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has an empty benchmarks array, meaning no recorded scores exist for any test. The Intel Core 9 273PE has 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench and Passmark suites. In Cinebench R15, the Intel part scores 3153 in multicore and 445 in singlecore. In Cinebench R20, it scores 13140 in multicore and 1855 in singlecore. In Cinebench R23, it scores 31288 in multicore and 4417 in singlecore. Passmark results for the Intel part include multithread at 36810, single thread at 3650, integer math at 139410, floating point math at 107884, data compression at 405885, data encryption at 22719, extended instructions at 24630, find prime numbers at 203, physics at 3120, and random string sorting at 45098. The Intel Core 9 273PE's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has an average score of 49796, which is 0.1% behind the Intel part. The Intel Core i5-14600KF has an average score of 49394, which is 0.9% behind. The Intel Core i9-13980HX has an average score of 50398, which is 1.1% ahead. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has an average score of 50448, which is 1.2% ahead. These deltas show the Intel Core 9 273PE sits within a tight performance band among these rivals. The largest advantage among these comparisons is the 0.9% lead over the Intel Core i5-14600KF, while the largest deficit is 1.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370. Because no benchmark data exists for the AMD Ryzen 5 130, no direct comparison of scores is possible. The recorded data shows the Intel part's singlecore Cinebench R23 score of 4417 and multicore score of 31288 as the strongest results in its own suite.
FAQ
Q: Does the database show any benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen 5 130?
A: No. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has an empty benchmarks array, so no recorded scores exist for any test. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50.
Q: What is the Intel Core 9 273PE's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has an average benchmark score of 49845 and sits at the 90th percentile of all CPUs in the database.
Q: How does the Intel Core 9 273PE compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel part is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 (49796), 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49394), 1.1% behind the Intel Core i9-13980HX (50398), and 1.2% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 (50448).
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The Intel Core 9 273PE has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 130 has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What memory types does each processor support?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel configuration and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 9 273PE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: What is the TDP of each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has a TDP of 28 W, and the Intel Core 9 273PE has a TDP of 65 W.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen 5 130 wins in power efficiency based on the recorded TDP figures, with a 28 W rating versus the Intel Core 9 273PE's 65 W rating. The AMD part also uses a smaller process node at 6 nm compared to Intel's 10 nm, and it offers 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus the Intel part's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The AMD part is the mobile option, designed for AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part is the desktop option for Intel Socket 1700. The Intel Core 9 273PE wins in core count with 12 cores versus 6, thread count with 24 versus 12, and boost clock at 5.70 GHz versus 4.55 GHz. The Intel part also has more cache: 80 KB L1 per core versus 64 KB, 2 MB L2 per core versus 512 KB, and 36 MB shared L3 versus 16 MB. Memory bandwidth favors the Intel part at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part supports only DDR5. The Intel Core 9 273PE has all recorded benchmark scores, so it wins in every measured workload category in the database: Cinebench R15 multicore (3153) and singlecore (445), Cinebench R20 multicore (13140) and singlecore (1855), Cinebench R23 multicore (31288) and singlecore (4417), and all Passmark tests including multithread (36810), single thread (3650), integer math (139410), floating point math (107884), data compression (405885), data encryption (22719), extended instructions (24630), find prime numbers (203), physics (3120), and random string sorting (45098). The Intel part's percentile ranking of 90 versus the AMD part's 50 also favors Intel. The AMD Ryzen 5 130 has no wins in any measured benchmark category because no measurements exist. Its only advantages from the data are the lower TDP, the 6 nm process node, the higher base clock of 2.90 GHz versus 2.30 GHz, and the higher PCIe lane count at Gen 4 (20 lanes versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes). The Intel part also carries a higher production status of Active, same as the AMD part, and both are listed as Active.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in nearly every recorded specification field. Core count: AMD has 6, Intel has 12. Thread count: AMD has 12, Intel has 24. Base clock: AMD at 2.90 GHz, Intel at 2.30 GHz. Boost clock: AMD at 4.55 GHz, Intel at 5.70 GHz. TDP: AMD at 28 W, Intel at 65 W. Socket: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture: Zen 3+ for AMD, no architecture listed for Intel. Codename: Rembrandt-R for AMD, Bartlett Lake for Intel. Generation: Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) for AMD, Core 9 (Bartlett Lake) for Intel. Process node: 6 nm for AMD, 10 nm for Intel. Foundry: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel. Die size: 210 mm² for AMD, no recorded die size for Intel. L1 cache: 64 KB per core for AMD, 80 KB per core for Intel. L2 cache: 512 KB per core for AMD, 2 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache: 16 MB shared for AMD, 36 MB shared for Intel. Memory support: DDR5 for AMD, DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. Memory bus: dual-channel for both. Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s for AMD, 89.6 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory: true for both. PCIe: Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only) for AMD, Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) for Intel. Integrated graphics: Radeon 660M for AMD, UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. Market segment: Mobile for AMD, Desktop for Intel. Production status: Active for both. Release date: 2025-09-30 for AMD, 2026-03-08 for Intel. Launch MSRP: no value for AMD, $549 for Intel. Multiplier unlocked: false for both. Part number: 100-000000992 (FP7r2) for AMD, SA4QD for Intel. Percentile versus all CPUs: 50 for AMD, 90 for Intel. Average benchmark score: 0 for AMD, 49845 for Intel. The AMD part has no nearest rivals recorded, while the Intel part has four nearest rivals with deltas ranging from 0.1% ahead to 1.2% behind.