AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Core 5 213PTE shows a comprehensive benchmark profile, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark entries in the database. This absence of recorded scores for the AMD part means the head-to-head comparison is necessarily one-sided, with all measurable performance data coming from the Intel processor.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751 and a single-core score of 3070. In the older Cinebench R20 test, it reaches 9135 multi-core and 1289 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 2192 multi-core and 309 single-core. These scores place the processor at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32924.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the Intel part's standing. The Intel Core i7-12700 posts an average score of 32942, which is 0.1 percent behind the Core 5 213PTE. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, putting it 0.3 percent ahead of the Core 5 213PTE. The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D averages 33079, a 0.5 percent gap, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G averages 33089, also 0.5 percent ahead. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the Core 5 213PTE performs on par with these established desktop and mobile processors.

PassMark tests further characterize the Intel part. The multi-thread score is 25590, while single-thread performance registers 3718. Integer math scores 93109, floating point math reaches 71722, and extended instructions hit 16146. Data compression scores 261083, data encryption scores 14413, and random string sorting scores 30106. Physics processing scores 2199, and the find prime numbers test scores 157.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark scores recorded, the database shows zero wins for either part in a direct head-to-head comparison. The Intel Core 5 213PTE's recorded results stand alone as the only performance data available for analysis.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in every measurable category simply because it is the only unit with recorded data. The database contains no benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i, so there is no basis for declaring any workload advantage for that processor.

The Intel part's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21751 indicates strong threaded rendering capability. Its single-core score of 3070 in the same test shows solid per-thread performance. The PassMark integer math score of 93109 and floating point math score of 71722 point to capable general computation, while the extended instructions score of 16146 suggests good SIMD and cryptographic workload handling.

Data compression at 261083 and random string sorting at 30106 reflect throughput-oriented tasks. The encryption score of 14413 is comparatively modest. Physics processing at 2199 and prime number finding at 157 round out the workload profile.

The AMD part's specifications suggest it could be competitive in certain areas, but without recorded benchmark scores, any claims about its workload victories would be speculative. The database simply does not contain the evidence required for such assertions.

The Verdict

The data supports only one clear conclusion: the Intel Core 5 213PTE is the only processor in this comparison with measurable performance. Its average benchmark score of 32924 places it at the 83rd percentile, with nearest rivals all within 0.5 percent of its score. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark entries, leaving its performance unquantified in the database.

A user selecting between these two parts based strictly on recorded data would choose the Intel Core 5 213PTE, as it alone has verified results. The Intel part also carries a launch MSRP of $221, a figure stated once here for reference. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE's production status is Active, its release date is recorded as March 8, 2026, and its part number is SA4QM. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i also shows Active production status with the same release date, but its part number is listed as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i. Its benchmark array is empty, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 213PTE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE averages 32924, which is 0.1 percent ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700, 0.3 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H, 0.5 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and 0.5 percent behind the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G.

Q: What is the Intel Core 5 213PTE's best Cinebench result?

A: The highest Cinebench score recorded is 21751 in the R23 multi-core test. The R23 single-core score is 3070.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 213PTE also supports ECC memory.

Q: What socket does each processor use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: What is the market segment for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i is classified as a Mobile processor, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE is classified as a Desktop processor.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a codename of Gorgon Point and a generation labeled Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). Its die size is 233 mm². The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses a 10 nm process at Intel, with a codename of Bartlett Lake and a generation labeled Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). No die size is recorded for the Intel part.

Both processors have 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part has a higher TDP of 45, while the AMD part draws 28.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The Intel part also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but its L2 is 2 MB per core and its L3 is 24 MB shared. The Intel part's larger L3 cache is a notable architectural difference.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part records 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part uses Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730.

The AMD part is fabricated by TSMC, and the Intel part by Intel. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part's production status is Active, as is the Intel part's, with both sharing a release date of March 8, 2026.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specification fields.

Clock speeds: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i runs at 2.00 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE runs at 2.10 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost.

TDP: the AMD part is rated at 28, the Intel part at 45.

Socket: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node: the AMD part uses 4 nm, the Intel part uses 10 nm.

Foundry: the AMD part uses TSMC, the Intel part uses Intel.

Codename: the AMD part is Gorgon Point, the Intel part is Bartlett Lake.

Generation: the AMD part is Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), the Intel part is Core 5 (Bartlett Lake).

Die size: the AMD part is 233 mm², the Intel part has no recorded die size.

L2 cache: the AMD part has 1 MB per core, the Intel part has 2 MB per core.

L3 cache: the AMD part has 8 MB, the Intel part has 24 MB shared.

Memory support: the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Memory bandwidth: the AMD part records 89.6 GB/s, the Intel part records 76.8 GB/s.

PCIe: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics: the AMD part uses Radeon 880M, the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730.

Market segment: the AMD part is Mobile, the Intel part is Desktop.

Part number: the AMD part is unknown, the Intel part is SA4QM.

Launch MSRP: the AMD part has none recorded, the Intel part is $221.

Benchmark percentile: the AMD part sits at the 50th percentile, the Intel part at the 83rd. Average benchmark score: the AMD part is 0, the Intel part is 32924.