AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Intel Core i7-14700 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 and Intel Core i7-14700 are both high-performing processors, yet the benchmark data reveals a stark contrast in their capabilities. The Intel Core i7-14700 dominates the comparison, winning all 11 shared benchmark tests, with its lead ranging from a modest 4.9% in single-threaded tasks to a staggering 56.7% in prime number calculation. While the AMD chip holds its own as a competitive embedded processor, the data positions the Intel part as the unequivocal performance leader across the board.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-14700’s victory is comprehensive, but the margin of victory varies significantly by workload. The narrowest gap is in single-thread performance, where the Intel chip scores 4236 against the AMD P164’s 4029, a 4.9% advantage. This close result suggests that in lightly threaded applications, the architectural efficiency of the AMD Zen 5 design nearly closes the gap with Intel’s higher boost clock.

The most dramatic divergence appears in the passmark_find_prime_numbers test, where Intel’s score of 164 is 56.7% higher than AMD’s 71. This workload, which is highly sensitive to integer throughput and cache hierarchy, clearly favors Intel’s 20-core configuration. Similarly, the floating-point math test shows Intel leading 106716 to 55799, a 47.7% margin, indicating a substantial advantage in scientific and engineering calculations.

In data encryption, Intel’s 29601 score is 45.8% ahead of AMD’s 16055. This is a critical metric for workloads involving secure communications or data protection. The physics test follows a similar pattern, with Intel scoring 2226 versus AMD’s 1210, a 45.6% difference, which points to better performance in simulation and gaming physics engines.

The multi-threaded benchmark, a key indicator of overall parallel processing capability, shows Intel scoring 40318 against AMD’s 25889, a 35.8% lead. This is consistent with the core count disparity: Intel offers 20 cores and 28 threads, while AMD provides 8 cores and 16 threads. The integer math test reinforces this, with Intel’s 154535 outpacing AMD’s 87940 by 43.1%.

Data compression results show Intel at 498198 versus AMD’s 327891, a 34.2% advantage, making Intel the better choice for archival and database workloads. Random string sorting, another memory-intensive task, sees Intel leading 54340 to 34801, a 36% difference. Extended instructions, which benefit from modern SIMD capabilities, show a narrower 14.8% lead for Intel (28388 vs 24193), suggesting that AMD’s newer architecture narrows the gap on specialized instruction sets.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the data, the Intel Core i7-14700 wins across every measured category, making it the superior choice for performance-critical applications. Its largest margins come in compute-heavy tasks like prime number finding (56.7% ahead) and floating-point math (47.7% ahead), making it ideal for scientific research, financial modeling, and 3D rendering. The encryption advantage (45.8%) positions it well for server-side security and VPN processing.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164, while losing every benchmark, still demonstrates competitive single-thread performance, trailing by only 4.9%. This makes it a viable option for embedded applications where per-core efficiency is paramount and power consumption is a concern. Its 28W TDP, compared to Intel’s 65W, suggests it is better suited for thermally constrained environments, though the data does not quantify power efficiency directly.

For multi-threaded workloads, the Intel part’s 35.8% lead in the multithread test translates to faster video encoding, software compilation, and batch processing. The AMD chip’s 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it is still a strong performer, but the Intel part also sits at the 91st percentile, meaning both are in the top tier of available processors, just with Intel having more headroom.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is built on a 4nm process at TSMC, codenamed Gorgon Point, and utilizes a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c core architecture. This is a mobile-focused design, evidenced by its 28W TDP and AMD Socket FP8. In contrast, the Intel Core i7-14700 is a desktop part based on the Raptor Lake-R architecture, manufactured on Intel’s 10nm process, with a 65W TDP and Intel Socket 1700.

The core configurations diverge sharply: AMD offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while Intel provides 20 cores and 28 threads. This explains the multi-threaded performance gap. Cache hierarchies also differ. Both have an 80 KB L1 cache per core, but Intel doubles the L2 cache to 2 MB per core versus AMD’s 1 MB. The L3 cache is significantly larger on Intel at 33 MB shared, compared to AMD’s 8 MB.

Memory support varies as well. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory, but AMD lists a specific memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel’s bandwidth is not provided. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities differ, with AMD offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes and Intel offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes, giving Intel a bandwidth advantage for high-speed storage and GPUs.

Integrated graphics also differ: AMD features the Radeon 880M, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 770. The release dates are notable, with AMD launching on 2026-03-08 and Intel on 2024-01-07, making the AMD part a newer design. The process node advantage (4nm vs 10nm) gives AMD a theoretical efficiency edge, though the benchmark data shows Intel’s larger core count overcomes this in raw performance.

Specification Differences

The key specification differences between the two processors are stark. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads, a base clock of 2.00 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core i7-14700 has 20 cores and 28 threads, a base clock of 2.10 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The TDP differs significantly: 28W for AMD versus 65W for Intel.

Socket compatibility is entirely different: AMD uses Socket FP8, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The process node shows AMD at 4nm (TSMC) and Intel at 10nm (Intel). The die size is 233 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel. L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel, while L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 33 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. PCIe generation differs: AMD is Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel is Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics are Radeon 880M for AMD and UHD Graphics 770 for Intel. The market segment is Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384. The part number for Intel is SRN40, while AMD’s is unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 has significantly more, with 20 cores and 28 threads, compared to the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164’s 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the performance difference in single-threaded tasks?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 leads by 4.9% in the passmark_single_thread test, scoring 4236 versus AMD’s 4029.

Q: How much faster is Intel in the multi-threaded benchmark?

A: Intel scores 40318 in passmark_multithread, which is 35.8% higher than AMD’s 25889.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 and the Intel Core i7-14700 support ECC memory.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has a TDP of 28W, while the Intel Core i7-14700 has a TDP of 65W.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 has a much larger L3 cache at 33 MB shared, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has only 8 MB.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-14700 is the superior performer in every benchmark category measured. For users prioritizing raw compute power, particularly in multi-threaded, floating-point, and encryption workloads, Intel is the clear choice. Its 20 cores and 28 threads deliver a 35.8% advantage in multithread performance and a 47.7% lead in floating-point math, making it ideal for rendering, scientific computing, and heavy multitasking.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164, despite losing all 11 benchmarks, is not without merit. Its 4.9% single-thread deficit is small, and its 28W TDP suggests it is far more power-efficient, though this is not quantified in the data. For embedded systems, mobile devices, or applications where thermal output is a constraint, the AMD part offers a compelling balance of performance and efficiency. Its 91st percentile ranking confirms it is a strong processor, just outclassed by Intel’s desktop flagship.

The Intel Core i7-14700 also offers a launch MSRP of $384, which is a factual data point but not an endorsement of value. Ultimately, the choice depends on the use case: Intel for maximum performance, AMD for embedded and mobile scenarios where its lower TDP and newer 4nm process are advantageous. The benchmark results leave no room for debate on which is faster, but the AMD chip’s design philosophy targets a different market segment entirely.