AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i vs Intel Core 7 250H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i and Intel Core 7 250H represent two distinct approaches to mobile processing. The Intel Core 7 250H is the established performer with a full suite of recorded benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i currently lacks any benchmark data in the database, leaving its performance profile unmeasured. The data indicates that the Intel Core 7 250H is the only one of the two that can be evaluated quantitatively, and it performs strongly within its market segment.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 7 250H is the clear choice for any workload requiring measurable performance, as the database contains no benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i. The Intel chip holds an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, placing it well above the median. Its average benchmark score of 35728 puts it in a tight competitive cluster, within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X, within 0.2% of the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, and essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 at a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i, with its 50th percentile ranking and zero recorded scores, cannot be recommended for tasks where benchmark-verified performance is required. The Intel part is the only processor here with demonstrated results across Cinebench and PassMark suites.

Where Each One Wins

Based on recorded data, the Intel Core 7 250H wins in every measurable category. It delivers a multicore Cinebench R23 score of 16561, a single-core score of 1931, and a PassMark multithread score of 27030. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4148 confirms strong per-core performance. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has no benchmark wins in the database, and no head-to-head results exist between the two. The Intel part also wins on structural advantages: it offers 14 cores and 20 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads for the AMD chip, and its 24 MB shared L3 cache dwarfs the AMD part's 4 MB L3. The AMD processor does hold advantages in process node, using a 4 nm TSMC fabrication versus Intel's 10 nm node, and it supports ECC memory, which the Intel chip does not. For workloads like data compression, where the Intel chip scores 303269 in PassMark, or floating point math at 65094, the Intel part is the sole option with proven capability.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in their underlying designs. The Intel Core 7 250H uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H codename, from the Core 7 generation branded as Raptor Lake Refresh. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process and integrates 14 cores with 20 threads. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i, by contrast, uses the Gorgon Point codename from the Ryzen AI Embedded generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process and packs 6 cores with 12 threads. Its cache consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and just 4 MB of L3. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode with no bandwidth figure recorded. The AMD processor includes ECC memory support, a feature absent from the Intel part. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip offers Gen 5 with 8 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD part using Radeon 840M and the Intel part using Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $502, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H boosts to 5.40 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i's boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD processor has ECC memory support enabled. The Intel Core 7 250H does not support ECC memory.

Q: How do the core counts compare between the two processors?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has 6 cores and 12 threads, giving the Intel part a substantial advantage in parallel workloads.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 250H uses a 10 nm process at Intel, indicating a more advanced fabrication for the AMD part.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The Intel Core 7 250H ranks in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, whereas the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel Core 7 250H supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database shows no head-to-head benchmark results directly comparing the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i and the Intel Core 7 250H. The AMD part has no recorded scores in any test, meaning a direct comparison is impossible from the available data. The Intel Core 7 250H, however, provides a full set of results that stand on their own. In Cinebench R23 multicore, it scores 16561, and in single-core it scores 1931. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score is 9697 with a single-core score of 1368. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multicore score of 3147 and a single-core score of 298. PassMark results for the Intel chip include a multithread score of 27030, a single-thread score of 4148, integer math at 99100, floating point math at 65094, data compression at 303269, data encryption at 18206, extended instructions at 17318, find prime numbers at 106, physics at 1824, and random string sorting at 34136. Against its nearest rivals, the Intel Core 7 250H's average score of 35728 places it 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H at 35670, essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 at 35719 with a 0% delta, and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X at 35909. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i, lacking any benchmark scores, cannot be positioned relative to these rivals in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The Intel Core 7 250H uses the Intel BGA 1744 socket, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel chip has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, compared to the AMD chip's 2.00 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost. TDP differs significantly: the Intel part draws 45 watts, while the AMD part is rated at 28 watts. The Intel processor has 14 cores and 20 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads for the AMD processor. Cache configurations also diverge: both have 80 KB of L1 per core, but the Intel chip offers 2 MB of L2 per core versus 1 MB for the AMD chip, and the Intel chip has 24 MB of shared L3 compared to 4 MB for the AMD chip. Memory support differs, with the AMD part supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, and the Intel part supporting DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while no bandwidth figure is recorded for the Intel chip. ECC memory support is present on the AMD chip but absent on the Intel chip. PCIe connectivity shows the AMD part with Gen 4 and 14 CPU lanes, while the Intel part has Gen 5 and 8 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics are the Radeon 840M for AMD and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU for Intel. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $502, while the AMD chip has none recorded. Release dates also differ: the Intel Core 7 250H was released on December 17, 2024, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i on March 8, 2026. The Intel part is identified by part number SRQ6UQ5MK, while the AMD part's part number is unknown. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The Intel chip is built on the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename, and the AMD chip uses the Gorgon Point codename with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores.