AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has a full set of benchmark scores, while the Intel Processor U302L has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. This asymmetry means the head-to-head comparison is defined entirely by the AMD part's measured results, with the Intel part's performance left as an unknown quantity.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 delivers a Passmark single-thread score of 3713. This places it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database, indicating strong per-core performance. The multi-thread score of 19262 reinforces this picture, showing that the 6-core, 12-thread design scales effectively across workloads that utilize all available threads.

Looking at the component-level benchmarks, the AMD part shows particular strength in integer math with a score of 62249, and floating-point math at 42248. Data compression reaches 230437, which is the highest individual score recorded for this processor. Random string sorting completes at 25181, while extended instructions achieve 16520. The data encryption score of 11444 and prime number finding at 57 round out the compute-focused tests.

The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is 37804. Its nearest rivals in the database are tightly clustered around this figure. The Intel Core 5 211E averages 37829, a delta of only -0.1 percent. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 sits at 37762, a 0.1 percent delta in the P132's favor. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 averages 37904, putting the P132 0.3 percent behind. The Intel Core i9-14901E averages 37911, also 0.3 percent ahead of the P132. These deltas are negligible in practical terms, placing the P132 in a performance tier where single-digit percentage differences separate it from far more expensive or differently positioned parts.

The Intel Processor U302L has no benchmark scores in the database at all. Its percentile ranking of 50 among all CPUs is recorded, but this is not supported by any measured test results in the data. The average benchmark score field is zero, and there are no nearest rivals listed. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible. What can be said from the data is that the U302L's specifications suggest a different performance envelope, with a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz, both substantially lower than the AMD part's 2.00 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost.

The head-to-head wins counter shows zero wins for both processors, which reflects the absence of a direct benchmark comparison rather than a tie.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split. Anyone selecting purely on measured performance should look to the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, which has verified scores across all recorded benchmark categories and an 86th percentile ranking. The Intel Processor U302L, by contrast, has no measured results in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking is present, but it is not backed by any test scores in the recorded data.

The AMD part's average benchmark score of 37804 places it in the same performance band as the Intel Core 5 211E (37829), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (37762), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (37904), and the Intel Core i9-14901E (37911). These deltas, ranging from -0.3 percent to +0.1 percent, indicate that the P132 is not a performance outlier in either direction. It sits in a competitive cluster where no single processor dominates by a meaningful margin.

For workloads that rely on single-threaded performance, the P132's score of 3713 is the only recorded data point available. For heavily threaded workloads, the multi-thread score of 19262 is likewise the sole reference. The Intel Processor U302L cannot be evaluated on these terms from the database, so any decision involving it must rely on its specification sheet rather than measured results.

The launch MSRP for the Intel Processor U302L is $285, recorded once in the database. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins in every measurable category because it is the only part with recorded scores. Its wins are not narrow victories over the U302L; they are simply the only numerical results available.

The P132 shows a balanced profile across compute workloads. Integer math (62249) and floating-point math (42248) are both strong, suggesting general-purpose compute capability. Data compression (230437) is the standout figure, indicating efficient handling of memory-bound data manipulation. Random string sorting (25181) further supports this pattern. Extended instructions (16520) and data encryption (11444) are more moderate, but still recorded as functional results.

The Intel Processor U302L wins in the categories where its recorded specifications exceed those of the AMD part. Its L3 cache is 10 MB shared, compared to 4 MB on the P132. Its L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core, versus 1 MB per core on the AMD part. It supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, while the AMD part lists only DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Its launch MSRP of $285 is the only price-related data point in the entire comparison. These are specification wins, not performance wins, because no benchmark data exists for the U302L.

The P132 wins on raw clock speed. Its 4.50 GHz boost clock is nearly double the U302L's 2.40 GHz boost. Its base clock of 2.00 GHz exceeds the U302L's 1.20 GHz. It also has more threads (12 versus 6) and more PCIe lanes (14 versus 8). The P132's process node is 4 nm from TSMC, while the U302L uses Intel's 10 nm node.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has a Passmark single-thread score of 3713. The Intel Processor U302L has no recorded single-thread score in the database.

Q: How does the AMD P132 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The P132 averages 37804. The Intel Core 5 211E averages 37829 (0.1 percent lower), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 averages 37762 (0.1 percent higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 averages 37904 (0.3 percent lower), and the Intel Core i9-14901E averages 37911 (0.3 percent lower). All deltas are within 0.3 percent.

Q: Does the Intel Processor U302L have any benchmark results?

A: No. The database shows no benchmark entries for the U302L, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile ranking of 50 is recorded but is not supported by any test scores.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 boosts to 4.50 GHz. The Intel Processor U302L boosts to 2.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Processor U302L has 10 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 4 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Processor U302L?

A: The launch MSRP is $285. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor U302L uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-PS codename, belonging to the Intel Processor generation on Raptor Lake. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

The core configurations differ significantly. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 5 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part lacks the Intel part's hyperthreading-style thread doubling, yet still delivers more threads overall due to its higher core count.

Cache hierarchies are structured differently. Both parts use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part uses 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part uses 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is the largest architectural gap: the AMD part has 4 MB, while the Intel part has 10 MB shared. This suggests the Intel part is designed to share a larger pool of last-level cache across fewer threads, while the AMD part relies on faster clock speeds and more threads.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel access and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel access but has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory is supported on the AMD part but not on the Intel part.

PCIe lanes also differ. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are present on both, with the AMD part using Radeon 840M and the Intel part using UHD Graphics 80EU.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Processor U302L uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, versus 5 cores and 6 threads on the Intel part. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD part and 1.20 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks are 4.50 GHz and 2.40 GHz, respectively.

Thermal design power differs substantially: the AMD part is rated at 28 watts, the Intel part at 15 watts. The AMD part's process node is 4 nm from TSMC; the Intel part uses 10 nm from Intel. Cache configurations differ in L2 (1 MB per core versus 1.25 MB per core) and L3 (4 MB versus 10 MB shared), with identical 80 KB per core L1 caches.

Memory support is broader on the Intel part (DDR4 and DDR5) compared to the AMD part (DDR5 and LPDDR5X). Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the AMD part at 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory support exists only on the AMD part. PCIe lane counts are 14 for the AMD part and 8 for the Intel part, both Gen 4.

The integrated graphics units differ: Radeon 840M on the AMD part, UHD Graphics 80EU on the Intel part. The Intel part has a recorded part number (SRPKGQ5CX) and a launch MSRP of $285, while the AMD part lists its part number as unknown and has no launch MSRP. The AMD part's release date is recorded as 2026-03-08, while the Intel part's release date is 2024-04-07. Both parts are listed as active in production, both are mobile market segments, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.