AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132
Processor 300T
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Processor 300T
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and the Intel Processor 300T. The AMD part carries a recorded PassMark score set and an 86th percentile overall ranking, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores, a 0 average benchmark score, and a 50th percentile ranking. This makes the quantitative comparison one-sided: the AMD part is measurable in every recorded workload, and the Intel part has no measured performance data.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database has no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors. The win totals for both parts are 0. That absence of direct entries is the first result of this comparison: there is no measured head-to-head score in either direction.
The AMD part does have a recorded PassMark benchmark set. Its average benchmark score is 37804, and it ranks at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest-rival data places it in a tight cluster. The Intel Core 5 211E averages 37829 with a delta of -0.1%. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 averages 37762 with a delta of 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 averages 37904 with a delta of -0.3%. The Intel Core i9-14901E averages 37911 with a delta of -0.3%. In other words, the AMD part sits within 0.3% of all four nearest rivals, with an average score of 37804.
Within the AMD score set, the largest recorded value is data compression at 230437. The remaining scores are data encryption at 11444, extended instructions at 16520, find prime numbers at 57, floating point math at 42248, integer math at 62249, multithread at 19262, physics at 1022, random string sorting at 25181, and single thread at 3713. The Intel Processor 300T has no benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, an empty nearest-rival list, and a 50th percentile ranking. There is no quantitative head-to-head win for the Intel part in the database.
Where Each One Wins
Because the Intel part has no recorded scores, every benchmark category with a numeric result belongs to the AMD part. The AMD part records 230437 in data compression, 11444 in data encryption, 16520 in extended instructions, 57 in find prime numbers, 42248 in floating point math, 62249 in integer math, 19262 in multithread, 1022 in physics, 25181 in random string sorting, and 3713 in single thread.
The Intel part has no entries in any of these tests. The database cannot assign it a use-case win in any workload category. The win totals in the head-to-head data are 0 for both parts, but that is a reflection of missing head-to-head entries, not a set of Intel wins. For multithreaded workloads, the AMD part records 19262. For single-threaded workloads, it records 3713. For specialized operations, the largest AMD score is data compression at 230437, and the smallest is find prime numbers at 57.
FAQ
Q: Does the Intel Processor 300T have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Processor 300T. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its nearest-rival list is empty.
Q: What is the AMD part's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has an average benchmark score of 37804 and ranks at the 86th percentile of all CPUs.
Q: How close are the AMD part's nearest rivals?
A: The AMD part's average score is 0.1% below the Intel Core 5 211E, 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, and 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and the Intel Core i9-14901E.
Q: Which part has the higher base clock?
A: The Intel Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40, while the AMD part has a base clock of 2.00. The AMD part also records a boost clock of 4.50, while the Intel part has no boost clock recorded.
Q: What memory and PCIe differences are recorded?
A: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with ECC memory and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU-only lanes. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 without ECC, has no memory bandwidth recorded, and uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes.
Q: Do the two processors use the same socket?
A: No. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.
Specification Differences
| Field | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 | Intel Processor 300T |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | not recorded | Raptor Lake |
| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-S |
| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |
| Cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 4 |
| Base clock | 2.00 | 3.40 |
| Boost clock | 4.50 | not recorded |
| TDP | 28 | 35 |
| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |
| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Die size | not recorded | 163 mm² |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | not recorded |
| ECC memory | true | false |
| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |
| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 710 |
| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |
| Launch MSRP | not recorded | $82 |
| Part number | unknown | SRN3K |
| Percentile vs all CPUs | 86 | 50 |
| Average benchmark score | 37804 | 0 |
Architecture Differences
The AMD part is built around Gorgon Point and the Ryzen AI Embedded generation with Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. The Intel part is built around Raptor Lake-S and the Intel Processor generation with the Raptor Lake architecture. The AMD part has no architecture entry recorded, while the Intel part explicitly lists Raptor Lake as its architecture.
The process node and foundry are different. AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process, and Intel uses Intel's 10 nm process. Intel's die size is recorded at 163 mm², while AMD's die size is not recorded.
Core and cache layout differ. AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads with 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 4 MB L3. Intel has 2 cores and 4 threads with 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but the memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.
Feature differences are also recorded. AMD includes ECC memory support, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, Radeon 840M integrated graphics, and PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU-only lanes. Intel does not include ECC support, has no memory bandwidth recorded, uses UHD Graphics 710, and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes.
The Verdict
The recorded data supports a clear benchmark-based choice: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is the only processor in this pairing with measured performance. It has an average benchmark score of 37804, an 86th percentile ranking, and a full recorded PassMark result set. The Intel Processor 300T has a 50th percentile ranking, but its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest-rival entries.
The Intel part does have a distinct specification profile: 2 cores, 4 threads, a base clock of 3.40, TDP of 35, Socket 1700, Raptor Lake architecture, DDR4/DDR5 support, UHD Graphics 710, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. Those specifications do not translate into any recorded benchmark win in this database.
For a comparison based strictly on recorded measurements, the AMD part is the only part with data to support a pick. The Intel part's role in the database is specification-only.