AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains a full PassMark test suite for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, while the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison impossible on a test-by-test basis. However, the AMD part's scores can be interpreted against its nearest rivals to establish its performance class, and the Intel part's percentile ranking relative to all CPUs provides a reference point.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 delivers a multi-threaded score of 19,262 in PassMark. Its single-thread score is 3,713. Data compression throughput reaches 230,437, while data encryption completes at 11,444. Extended instruction workloads score 16,520, and prime number finding scores 57. Floating point math scores 42,248, integer math scores 62,249, physics scores 1,022, and random string sorting scores 25,181. The average benchmark score across the suite is 37,804.

The database places the AMD part at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rivals in average score are the Intel Core 5 211E at 37,829 (a delta of -0.1% relative to the AMD part), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 at 37,762 (0.1% above), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37,904 (-0.3%), and the Intel Core i9-14901E at 37,911 (-0.3%). These sub-percent differences show the P132 sits squarely in a tight performance cluster, effectively tied with each rival.

The Intel Processor 300 has no benchmark entries in the database, so its average score is recorded as zero. Its percentile ranking is 50, placing it at the midpoint of all CPUs. Without measured scores, no delta percentages can be computed, and no wins can be assigned to either part in the head-to-head table.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake-S codename with Raptor Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Intel die size is 163 mm²; no die size is recorded for the AMD part.

Core configurations diverge sharply. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 2 cores and 4 threads. Base clocks differ: the AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz, the Intel part at 3.90 GHz. The AMD part has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz; the Intel part has no boost clock recorded. Thermal design power also differs: 28 watts for AMD versus 46 watts for Intel.

Cache layouts are distinct. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core, while Intel has 1.25 MB per core. L3 differs in structure: AMD has 4 MB (no sharing note), Intel has 6 MB shared. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with no bandwidth figure recorded. ECC memory is supported on the AMD part but not on the Intel part.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 14 CPU-only lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon 840M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 710. The AMD part is classified as mobile, the Intel part as desktop. Sockets are different as well: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part's release date is March 2026; the Intel part's release date is January 2024.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins on core count, thread count, boost capability, memory flexibility, ECC support, and process technology. Six cores and twelve threads give it a substantial parallel workload advantage over a dual-core, four-thread part. The 4 nm TSMC process versus the 10 nm Intel node indicates a generational efficiency gap. The recorded 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and support for both DDR5 and LPDDR5X make it suited for bandwidth-sensitive embedded and mobile workloads. ECC memory support gives it an edge in data-integrity scenarios.

The Intel Processor 300 wins on base clock, PCIe generation, and desktop positioning. A 3.90 GHz base clock versus 2.00 GHz means it starts from a much higher frequency for lightly threaded tasks, though it has no recorded boost clock to push beyond that. Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes doubles the lane count and moves to a newer interconnect generation versus the AMD part's Gen 4 with 14 lanes. The desktop socket and Raptor Lake-S design point it at conventional desktop builds, while the AMD part targets embedded mobile systems.

The AMD part's benchmark suite shows strengths in specific workloads. Data compression at 230,437 is its highest single score, indicating strong throughput for compression-heavy tasks. Integer math at 62,249 and floating point math at 42,248 show balanced arithmetic performance. Random string sorting at 25,181 and extended instructions at 16,520 round out a capable general-purpose profile. The physics score of 1,022 is the lowest relative number in the suite, suggesting that simulated physics workloads do not scale as well as other tests.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD part's average score is 37,804. Its closest rival, the Intel Core 5 211E, scores 37,829, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37,762, 0.1% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904, 0.3% lower. The Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37,911, 0.3% lower. All four rivals are within a fraction of a percent.

Q: What is the core and thread difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads. The AMD part offers three times the core count and three times the thread count.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Processor 300 uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Processor 300, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero. Its percentile ranking is 50, placing it at the median of all CPUs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 | Intel Processor 300 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 2 |

| Threads | 12 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | None recorded |

| TDP | 28 W | 46 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | March 2026 | January 2024 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $82 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRN3J |

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split based on workload type and platform. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is the choice for parallel processing, memory bandwidth, and ECC-dependent tasks. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration with a recorded 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and LPDDR5X support suits embedded and mobile systems where power efficiency at 28 W and data integrity matter. The benchmark suite confirms its position at the 86th percentile, with average scores effectively tied to four established rivals. Its 4 nm process and Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture indicate a modern design with headroom in multi-threaded and compression workloads, as shown by the 230,437 data compression score.

The Intel Processor 300 is the choice for a desktop platform with higher base clock and newer PCIe. Its 3.90 GHz base clock beats the AMD part's 2.00 GHz base by a wide margin for single-threaded responsiveness, though no boost clock is recorded to extend that advantage. Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes provides more interconnect bandwidth than the AMD part's Gen 4 with 14 lanes. The 46 W TDP and desktop socket position it for conventional builds, and the 163 mm² die size on a 10 nm Intel node reflects an older, larger process. Its 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all CPUs, but without benchmark scores, its performance class relative to the AMD part cannot be quantified from the database.

Neither part has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a differentiating factor. The AMD part supports ECC, the Intel part does not. The AMD part uses Radeon 840M graphics, the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 710. The AMD part's release date is newer by over two years, and it carries no recorded launch MSRP, while the Intel part launched at $82.

For embedded, mobile, or efficiency-focused builds requiring ECC and multi-threaded throughput, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is the data-supported pick. For a desktop system where base clock and PCIe Gen 5 are priorities, the Intel Processor 300 holds the advantage. The absence of Intel benchmark data means any comparative performance claim for that part rests solely on its percentile ranking, not measured scores.