AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Core i9-14901TE Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and the Intel Core i9-14901TE shows two processors aimed at very different operational envelopes. The AMD part, with a 28 W TDP, is a mobile-class, power-lean processor built on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel part, with a 45 W TDP, is a desktop-class chip on Intel’s 10 nm process with a larger core count and a much higher boost clock. The recorded data shows the AMD processor holds an average benchmark score of 37,804 across its tested workloads, placing it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking, which means no direct head-to-head measurements exist for this comparison.

Given the data, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is the only part with verified performance metrics. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which scores 37,904 and trails the P132 by 0.3%, and the Intel Core i9-14901E, which scores 37,911 and also trails by 0.3%. The P132 effectively matches those two higher-tier parts, with deltas of less than half a percent. For workloads that rely on the measured PassMark tests, the P132 delivers competitive results despite its lower core count and power budget. The Intel Core i9-14901TE, by contrast, cannot be placed in any performance ranking from the database because no benchmark data exists for it. Users seeking a validated, measured part should look at the AMD. Users needing a desktop socket, eight cores, and Gen 5 PCIe lanes may consider the Intel, but its performance is unverified in this database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins in every category where data exists, simply because it is the only part with recorded benchmark scores. The database lists 11 PassMark subtests for the AMD, covering integer math (62,249), floating-point math (42,248), data compression (230,437), data encryption (11,444), extended instructions (16,520), prime number finding (57), multithreaded performance (19,262), physics (1,022), random string sorting (25,181), and single-thread performance (3,713). The Intel Core i9-14901TE has zero recorded scores in every one of these categories, so the AMD holds the win in each measured workload.

The Intel part does win on paper in specifications that the AMD lacks. It offers 8 cores and 16 threads versus the AMD’s 6 cores and 12 threads. Its boost clock reaches 5.50 GHz compared to the AMD’s 4.50 GHz. It uses a desktop Socket 1700, supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and includes 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD uses a mobile Socket FP8, PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, and only 4 MB of L3 cache. In terms of raw core count, clock ceiling, cache capacity, and PCIe generation, the Intel specification sheet is superior. But the database contains no benchmark results to confirm whether those specifications translate into actual performance wins.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14901TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R variant, belongs to the Core 14th Gen family, and is built on Intel’s 10 nm process. The AMD’s process node is smaller, which correlates with its lower 28 W TDP. The Intel’s larger 10 nm process and 8-core configuration correlate with its higher 45 W TDP.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel also has 80 KB of L1 per core but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core and provides a much larger 36 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel’s die size is recorded at 257 mm², while the AMD’s die size is not listed. Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

Memory and expansion differ as well. The AMD uses a mobile socket (AMD Socket FP8) and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. The Intel uses a desktop socket (Intel Socket 1700) and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD includes a Radeon 840M, while the Intel includes UHD Graphics 770. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD was released in March 2026, while the Intel was released in June 2024. The AMD’s part number is unknown; the Intel’s part number is recorded as Q49CSRNJJ.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i9-14901TE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has an average benchmark score of 37,804 across the database’s recorded tests. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has an average score of 0, with no recorded benchmark results.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and the Intel Core i9-14901TE support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor provides more PCIe lanes and a newer generation?

A: The Intel Core i9-14901TE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database for these two processors. The headToHeadBenchmarks field is empty, and the wins count for each part is 0. Therefore, a direct comparison of measured performance between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and the Intel Core i9-14901TE cannot be made from the recorded data. The AMD part, however, has a full set of PassMark results. Its single-thread score is 3,713, its multithread score is 19,262, and its integer math score is 62,249. Its floating-point math score is 42,248, and its data compression score is 230,437. In the absence of any Intel scores, the AMD is the only part whose benchmark performance can be analyzed.

The AMD’s average score of 37,804 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14901E, averages 37,911, which is 0.3% higher than the P132. Another rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, averages 37,904, also 0.3% higher. The Intel Core 5 211E averages 37,829, which is 0.1% lower than the P132. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 averages 37,762, which is 0.1% lower. These deltas are small, all within a fraction of a percent, indicating the P132 performs in the same class as those four parts despite differences in core counts and power envelopes. The Intel Core i9-14901TE has no nearest rivals listed in the database and no average score, so it cannot be compared in this manner.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two processors differ, according to the database.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 | Intel Core i9-14901TE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Series | null | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | null | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | null | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | null |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08T17:00:00.000Z | 2024-06-30T17:00:00.000Z |

| Part Number | unknown | Q49CSRNJJ |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 86 | 50 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 37,804 | 0 |

| Nearest Rivals | 4 listed | none listed |

Both parts share the same L1 cache size (80 KB per core), dual-channel memory bus, ECC support, and locked multipliers. The AMD uses a smaller process node, a lower TDP, and a mobile socket, while the Intel uses a larger process, a higher TDP, and a desktop socket with more cores, more threads, a higher boost clock, more L2 and L3 cache, and newer PCIe generation. The database records no benchmark results for the Intel, leaving its actual performance unmeasured.