AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Core i7-14700HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive sweep in favor of the Intel Core i7-14700HX across all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 does not register a single win in the database's direct comparison set. The smallest margin belongs to single-thread performance, where the Intel part leads by 5.9 percent. The widest gap appears in the prime number search workload, where Intel's score of 165 versus AMD's 57 yields a 65.5 percent deficit for the AMD processor.

In multithreaded throughput, the Intel Core i7-14700HX scores 36,566 against the AMD's 19,262, a 47.3 percent advantage. The data compression test shows Intel at 438,539 versus AMD at 230,437, a 47.5 percent lead. Encryption follows a similar pattern: Intel records 26,092 while AMD manages 11,444, a 56.1 percent difference. The floating-point math workload amplifies the gap further, with Intel's 93,836 outpacing AMD's 42,248 by 55 percent. Integer math shows Intel at 131,296 against AMD's 62,249, a 52.6 percent margin.

The physics simulation test places Intel at 2,252 versus AMD's 1,022, a 54.6 percent difference. Random string sorting sees Intel score 48,544 while AMD posts 25,181, a 48.1 percent gap. Extended instruction workloads favor Intel by 35.8 percent, with scores of 25,718 and 16,520 respectively. The single-thread results, while still favoring Intel, show the closest competition: 3,947 versus 3,713, a 5.9 percent delta. The average benchmark score reinforces the overall picture: Intel's 45,953 average versus AMD's 37,804 places the Intel part 21.6 percent higher on aggregate.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy between these two mobile processors. The Intel Core i7-14700HX delivers substantially higher scores in every recorded workload category. Its multithread score of 36,566 nearly doubles the AMD's 19,262, which means applications that scale across cores will see a pronounced advantage on the Intel platform. The single-thread margin is smaller but still consistent: Intel's 3,947 versus AMD's 3,713 suggests that even lightly threaded tasks favor the Intel part, albeit by a modest 5.9 percent.

The percentile ranking places the Intel Core i7-14700HX in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 sits in the 86th percentile. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 45,953 places it alongside workstation-class processors such as the AMD EPYC 7303 (45,960, 0 percent delta) and the AMD EPYC 4364P (45,970, 0 percent delta). The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132's average score of 37,804 places it near the Intel Core 5 211E (37,829, -0.1 percent delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (37,762, 0.1 percent delta).

The Intel part also offers a higher boost clock (5.50 GHz versus 4.50 GHz) and a larger shared L3 cache (33 MB versus 4 MB). It uses an unlocked multiplier, whereas the AMD part is locked. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both support ECC memory. The Intel part has a larger die size at 257 mm² and uses Intel's 10 nm process, while the AMD part uses TSMC's 4 nm process. The Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part offers PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes. The Intel integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 770, and the AMD integrated graphics is Radeon 840M.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded benchmark data, the Intel Core i7-14700HX wins in every category where a direct comparison exists. The largest relative victories appear in compute-heavy workloads: prime number finding (65.5 percent lead), encryption (56.1 percent), physics simulation (54.6 percent), and floating-point math (55 percent). These results suggest the Intel part is better suited for scientific computation, simulation, data encryption, and any workload that relies heavily on arithmetic throughput.

The multithreaded advantage (47.3 percent) and the integer math lead (52.6 percent) indicate that the Intel processor is the stronger choice for parallel compilation, rendering, and general productivity tasks that can use up to 28 threads. The data compression result (47.5 percent lead) and random string sorting result (48.1 percent lead) point to advantages in database workloads, archiving, and text processing. The extended instructions margin (35.8 percent) covers workloads that use SIMD and other specialized instruction sets.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 does not present a single benchmark win in the head-to-head table. However, its profile shows a much lower thermal design point (28 watts versus 55 watts), which is not reflected in any benchmark score but appears in the specifications. The AMD part also uses a smaller process node (4 nm versus 10 nm) and supports LPDDR5X memory. The AMD part's closest rival in the database, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, scores within 0.1 percent of its average, indicating that the P132 sits in a performance bracket near other mid-range mobile processors. The Intel part's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46,030, -0.2 percent delta) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46,062, -0.2 percent delta), placing it in a higher performance tier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX scores 3,947 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 3,713. The Intel part leads by 5.9 percent.

Q: How large is the multithread performance gap?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX scores 36,566 in the PassMark multithread test, versus 19,262 for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132. This represents a 47.3 percent advantage for the Intel processor.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i7-14700HX has 20 cores and 28 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX boosts to 5.50 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and the Intel Core i7-14700HX support ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in the percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 ranks in the 86th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses the Gorgon Point codename with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c generation architecture. It is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i7-14700HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh architecture and is built on a 10 nm process by Intel. The Intel part has a die size of 257 mm², while the AMD part does not have a recorded die size.

The cache hierarchy differs substantially. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger shared L3 cache (33 MB versus 4 MB) provides a significant advantage in workloads that benefit from larger on-die data residency.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, but no bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. The AMD part uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1964.

The PCIe capabilities differ: the AMD part provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD integrated graphics is Radeon 840M, and the Intel integrated graphics is UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part has a thermal design point of 28 watts, while the Intel part has a thermal design point of 55 watts. The Intel part has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD part does not. The Intel part's part number is SRMXG, while the AMD part's part number is unknown. The AMD processor's release date is March 2026, and the Intel processor's release date is January 2024. Both are listed as active in production and target the mobile market segment.