AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F records an average benchmark score of 53620, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 records 37804. The Intel part sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, and the AMD part sits at the 86th percentile.

Q: How does the single-thread performance compare between the two?

A: In the PassMark single-thread test, the Intel Core i7-14700F scores 4257, which is 12.8% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132's score of 3713. The Intel processor also reaches a boost clock of 5.40 GHz compared to 4.50 GHz for the AMD chip.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. The Intel processor uses a Raptor Lake Refresh architecture, and the AMD processor uses the Gorgon Point codename with Zen 5 / Zen 5c generation.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 4 MB of L3 cache. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the Intel part has 2 MB of L2 cache per core versus 1 MB per core for the AMD part.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and the Intel Core i7-14700F support ECC memory. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the thermal design power difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has a TDP of 28 watts, and the Intel Core i7-14700F has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD chip is a mobile segment processor, whereas the Intel chip is a desktop segment processor.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and the Intel Core i7-14700F represent fundamentally different design approaches. The AMD processor uses the Gorgon Point codename with a generation labeled Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel processor uses the Raptor Lake codename with a Raptor Lake Refresh architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Intel die size is listed at 257 mm², while the AMD die size is not recorded in the database.

Core counts diverge sharply. The AMD part provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part provides 20 cores and 28 threads. This core disparity drives most of the multithreaded performance gap. The Intel processor also carries a larger L3 cache at 33 MB shared, compared to 4 MB for the AMD processor. Per-core L2 cache is 2 MB for Intel and 1 MB for AMD, while both share the same 80 KB per-core L1 cache.

Memory support differs in breadth. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part integrates a Radeon 840M graphics solution, while the Intel part has no integrated graphics (N/A). The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

The market segments are distinct as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is classified as a mobile processor, and the Intel Core i7-14700F is classified as a desktop processor. The production status for both is active. The AMD part released on 2026-03-08, and the Intel part released on 2024-01-07. The Intel part has a recorded part number of SRN3Z, while the AMD part number is unknown. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The head-to-head data records 11 benchmark wins for the Intel Core i7-14700F and 0 wins for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132. Every PassMark workload in the comparison favors the Intel processor, which makes the use-case split largely a matter of workload type rather than processor choice.

The Intel processor wins heavily in integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads. PassMark integer math shows a 60% advantage for Intel, and floating-point math shows a 60.5% advantage. These workloads scale with core count, and the 20-core Intel part has a structural advantage over the 6-core AMD part. The same logic applies to PassMark multithread, where Intel leads by 53.4%, and PassMark physics, where Intel leads by 58.4%.

The AMD processor's only realistic territory is constrained by its lower power envelope and mobile form factor. With a TDP of 28 watts, the AMD part is designed for embedded and mobile deployment, where the 65-watt Intel desktop part would not fit. The single-thread gap is the smallest margin in the comparison at 12.8%, which indicates that the AMD Zen 5 architecture narrows the per-core gap even while losing overall. The AMD processor also offers integrated Radeon 840M graphics, which the Intel part lacks entirely, making the AMD chip viable for systems that need a graphics output without a discrete GPU.

The database shows the Intel processor sitting at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD processor sits at the 86th percentile. The Intel part's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6505P at a delta of -0.2%, the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 0.6%, and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 0.8%. The AMD part's nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 211E at -0.1%, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 at 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at -0.3%, and the Intel Core i9-14901E at -0.3%. These rival clusters show that the AMD part competes in a much lower absolute performance band than the Intel part.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field recorded in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.10 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 4.50 GHz for AMD and 5.40 GHz for Intel. TDP is 28 watts for AMD and 65 watts for Intel. Sockets differ: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700.

Process technology differs. The AMD part uses a 4 nm node from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm node from Intel. The Intel die size is 257 mm², with no die size recorded for the AMD part. Cache hierarchies differ in L2 and L3. AMD has 1 MB L2 per core and 4 MB L3. Intel has 2 MB L2 per core and 33 MB shared L3. Both have 80 KB L1 per core.

Memory support differs. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel bus. AMD records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel has no bandwidth figure recorded. PCIe versions differ: AMD uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics differ: AMD has Radeon 840M, Intel has N/A. Market segments differ: mobile versus desktop. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $359, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. The Intel part number is SRN3Z, and the AMD part number is unknown. The Intel release date is 2024-01-07, and the AMD release date is 2026-03-08.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head benchmarks cover 11 PassMark workloads, and the Intel Core i7-14700F wins all of them. The largest margin appears in PassMark find prime numbers, where Intel scores 176 against AMD's 57, a delta of -67.6% for the AMD part. This workload is highly sensitive to core count and clock speed, which explains the magnitude of the Intel advantage.

PassMark data encryption shows Intel at 30144 versus AMD at 11444, a delta of -62%. PassMark floating-point math shows Intel at 107005 versus AMD at 42248, a delta of -60.5%. PassMark integer math shows Intel at 155808 versus AMD at 62249, a delta of -60%. These three workloads all favor the Intel processor by roughly 60%, which aligns with the difference in core and thread counts.

PassMark physics shows Intel at 2455 versus AMD at 1022, a delta of -58.4%. PassMark random string sorting shows Intel at 55918 versus AMD at 25181, a delta of -55%. PassMark data compression shows Intel at 505885 versus AMD at 230437, a delta of -54.4%. PassMark multithread shows Intel at 41317 versus AMD at 19262, a delta of -53.4%. PassMark extended instructions shows Intel at 28564 versus AMD at 16520, a delta of -42.2%.

The narrowest margin in the comparison is PassMark single-thread (also recorded as PassMark singlethread), where Intel scores 4257 and AMD scores 3713, a delta of -12.8%. This is the only workload in which the AMD processor comes within a relatively close range of the Intel part. The single-thread result suggests that the Zen 5 architecture in the AMD processor delivers competitive per-core performance, but the 6-core configuration limits aggregate throughput.

The average benchmark score difference is 53620 for Intel versus 37804 for AMD, a gap of roughly 42% in favor of the Intel part. The percentile difference is 91 versus 86. The head-to-head record of 11 wins to 0 wins reflects a consistent performance hierarchy across all measured PassMark workloads. The data confirms that the Intel Core i7-14700F dominates the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 in every recorded benchmark, with the single-thread test being the only area where the AMD processor approaches parity.