AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 records an average benchmark score of 37804, while the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 28065. The AMD part also sits at the 86th percentile versus the Intel part's 80th percentile.

Q: How do the two compare in single-thread performance?

A: In the PassMark single-thread test, the Intel Core i5-14500T scores 3736, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 3713. The Intel part leads by 0.6 percent, a narrow margin.

Q: Which chip wins in the head-to-head benchmark comparison?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T wins 10 of the 11 shared benchmark tests. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins only one test, PassMark extended instructions, by 3 percent.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Do both processors support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, both list ECC memory support as a feature.

Q: What is the difference in their integrated graphics?

A: The AMD part uses a Radeon 840M, while the Intel part integrates UHD Graphics 770. The database does not include graphics benchmark data for either.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14500T is a Raptor Lake-R part, part of the Core 14th Gen series, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a 215 mm² die size.

The AMD chip contains 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel chip contains 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD part's thermal design power is 28 watts, while the Intel part is rated at 35 watts.

Cache structures differ notably. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and a total of 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support is not identical. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with dual-channel memory and a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

The AMD processor is classified as a mobile part, while the Intel processor is a desktop part. The Intel part has a known part number, SRN3P, and a release date of January 2024; the AMD part has a release date of March 2026 and an unknown part number.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data covers 11 PassMark tests. The Intel Core i5-14500T wins ten of them, with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 taking a single victory.

The AMD part wins PassMark extended instructions with a score of 16520 against 16043, a 3 percent advantage. This is the only test where the AMD processor finishes ahead.

The Intel part's largest win comes in PassMark find prime numbers. It scores 81 versus 57, a 29.6 percent advantage. The next largest win is in floating point math, where Intel scores 58869 against 42248, a 28.2 percent lead. Data encryption also favors Intel heavily: 15410 versus 11444, a 25.7 percent margin.

Integer math shows a 23.1 percent win for Intel, with scores of 80922 and 62249. Physics follows with Intel at 1288 versus 1022, a 20.7 percent lead. Multithread performance gives Intel 22910 against 19262, a 15.9 percent advantage.

The closest margins appear in single-thread tests. PassMark single thread has Intel at 3736 and AMD at 3713, a 0.6 percent difference. Random string sorting shows Intel at 28462 versus 25181, an 11.5 percent lead. Data compression gives Intel 262417 against 230437, a 12.2 percent win.

The average benchmark scores place the AMD part higher overall, but the head-to-head tests show Intel dominating the specific workloads recorded. The AMD part's higher average comes from its stronger showing in tests outside this shared set, including Cinebench and Geekbench results that are only present for the Intel part in this database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads; the Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads. Base clock is 2.00 GHz for AMD and 1.70 GHz for Intel. Boost clock is 4.50 GHz for AMD and 4.80 GHz for Intel.

Thermal design power differs: 28 watts for AMD, 35 watts for Intel. The socket is different: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. Process node is 4 nm for AMD (TSMC) versus 10 nm for Intel (Intel foundry). The Intel part has a measured die size of 215 mm²; the AMD part has no die size listed.

L2 cache per core is 1 MB for AMD and 1.25 MB for Intel. L3 cache is 4 MB total for AMD and 24 MB shared for Intel. Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X; Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is listed only for AMD at 89.6 GB/s. PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 840M on AMD, UHD Graphics 770 on Intel. Market segment is mobile for AMD and desktop for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $232; the AMD part has no launch MSRP listed. The Intel part has a part number SRN3P; the AMD part is unknown.

The Verdict

The benchmark data shows a clear split between overall average and specific workloads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 holds a higher average benchmark score at 37804 and a higher percentile at 86. The Intel Core i5-14500T holds a lower average at 28065 and a lower percentile at 80. However, in the head-to-head PassMark tests, the Intel part wins ten of eleven comparisons.

The Intel part is the stronger choice for workloads that rely on the measured PassMark tests, particularly those that scale with core count and cache. Its 14 cores, 20 threads, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache correspond to large wins in multithread, integer math, floating point math, and prime number finding. The data shows a 15.9 percent lead in multithread and a 23.1 percent lead in integer math.

The AMD part is the better choice for workloads that match its extended instructions performance, where it leads by 3 percent. Its higher average score across the full database suggests that its performance profile in other tests, such as Cinebench and Geekbench recorded for the Intel part but not for the AMD part, differs enough to lift its mean. The AMD part also operates at a lower TDP of 28 watts, which may suit power-constrained designs.

The Intel part has a lower single-thread deficit of only 0.6 percent, meaning the two are nearly matched in that area. The AMD part wins no other shared test. The data does not support a general claim that the AMD part outperforms the Intel part; it wins one specific test and has a higher average due to its results in tests not shared.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500T wins in every measured PassMark workload except extended instructions. Its largest advantages are in prime number finding (29.6 percent), floating point math (28.2 percent), data encryption (25.7 percent), and integer math (23.1 percent). These results indicate a strong fit for compute-heavy tasks that use math operations, encryption, and compression. The multithread score of 22910 versus 19262, a 15.9 percent lead, also points to parallel workloads favoring the Intel part. The random string sorting test shows an 11.5 percent lead for Intel, and data compression shows a 12.2 percent lead.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins only extended instructions, with a 3 percent margin. That single result, combined with its higher average benchmark score of 37804 and lower power envelope, suggests it fits scenarios where the extended instruction set matters more than the other measured tests. Its 28-watt TDP versus 35 watts for Intel may also matter for thermal limits, though the database does not provide power consumption measurements.

For single-thread tasks, the two are essentially equivalent: Intel leads by 0.6 percent in both single-thread tests. Neither part shows a meaningful advantage there. For tasks that use many cores or large shared cache, the Intel part's 14 cores and 24 MB L3 give it a clear edge in the recorded data. For tasks that rely on the specific extended instructions where AMD leads, the Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is the only winner from the head-to-head set.

The average score gap, with AMD at 37804 and Intel at 28065, reflects the AMD part's performance in the broader database. The percentile difference, 86 versus 80, also favors AMD. The data does not reconcile these averages with the head-to-head results; it simply records both. Users should weigh the specific workload tests over the average when choosing between these two.