AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear pattern: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins 9 of the 11 shared benchmark comparisons, while the Intel Core i7-14700T takes 2. The largest margin comes in PassMark extended instructions, where AMD scores 31969 against Intel's 20052, a 59.4% advantage. That is the single biggest gap in either direction across the entire comparison set.

Data compression follows a similar trajectory. AMD posts 461650 versus Intel's 354216, a 30.3% lead. Random string sorting shows AMD ahead by 26.8%, with scores of 48894 and 38546 respectively. Multi-threaded performance favors AMD as well: 36487 versus 30571, a 19.4% difference. Integer math confirms the trend, with AMD at 126829 and Intel at 113854, an 11.4% edge.

Single-thread results narrow the picture but still favor AMD. The Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 scores 4301, while the Core i7-14700T manages 3905, a 10.1% difference. Data encryption is closer, with AMD at 23132 and Intel at 21277, an 8.7% margin. Floating point math is nearly a tie: 79887 for AMD versus 79042 for Intel, just 1.1% apart.

The Intel part's two wins are smaller in magnitude. Prime number finding goes to Intel at 145 versus 130, a 10.3% edge. Physics also favors Intel, 1946 versus 1877, a 3.5% margin. These are the only two benchmarks where Intel comes out ahead, and neither approaches the scale of AMD's dominant extended instructions result.

The average benchmark score amplifies the separation. AMD's average sits at 74496, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Intel's average is 41914, good for the 88th percentile. The nearest rivals in the database further contextualize these numbers. AMD sits within 1.3% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745, the AMD EPYC 4545P, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, all of which cluster within a narrow band around 74000 to 75500. Intel, by contrast, sits within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, the Intel Core i7-12850HX, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400, and the Intel Core 7 251TE, all near 42000. The two processors occupy entirely different performance tiers according to the database's aggregate metrics.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins across most compute-heavy workloads. Extended instruction throughput, data compression, and random string sorting show the largest margins, indicating strong performance in tasks that leverage large data sets and vectorized code paths. Multi-threaded throughput is a decisive advantage, and single-thread performance leads by a meaningful 10.1%, which benefits lightly threaded applications as well. Integer math and encryption workloads also favor AMD, rounding out a broad portfolio of wins that spans both integer and floating point domains.

The Intel Core i7-14700T wins only in prime number finding and physics. Both are relatively narrow margins compared to AMD's larger victories. Prime number finding often reflects branch prediction and scalar integer throughput, while physics simulations may favor the specific scheduling behavior of Intel's hybrid core design. These wins suggest Intel retains a small niche in scalar workloads that do not scale well with the instruction-level parallelism AMD's Zen 5 architecture provides.

The overall win count of 9 to 2 does not tell the full story, because the magnitudes differ sharply. AMD's wins include three results above 25% and one above 59%, while Intel's two wins both stay below 11%. In aggregate benchmark terms, AMD's average score is roughly 77.7% higher than Intel's. The database shows AMD delivering consistently higher throughput across the majority of measured workloads, with Intel holding only narrow pockets of advantage.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Gorgon Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. It offers 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 1.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Both reach the same 5.20 GHz boost ceiling, but the core and thread configurations differ substantially.

Cache hierarchies diverge as well. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel provides 2 MB per core. L3 cache shows a larger gap, with AMD offering 16 MB total and Intel offering 33 MB shared. The larger L3 on Intel may help in cache-resident workloads, but the benchmark data does not consistently reflect that advantage. The die sizes also differ, with AMD at 233 mm² and Intel at 257 mm².

The process node gap is significant. AMD's 4 nm TSMC process versus Intel's 10 nm process explains part of the efficiency and performance differences, though the database does not include direct power efficiency measurements. The TDP figures recorded are 28 watts for AMD and 35 watts for Intel, a 7 watt difference in favor of AMD. Memory support differs as well: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel's memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory and dual-channel memory buses.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation. AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses the Radeon 890M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The market segments are distinct, with AMD classified as mobile and Intel as desktop. AMD uses the AMD Socket FP8, while Intel uses the Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, while Intel belongs to the Core i7 Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part number is 100-000001683, and the Intel part number is SRN41. Intel carries a launch MSRP of $384; AMD has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 scores 4301 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the Intel Core i7-14700T scores 3905. AMD leads by 10.1%.

Q: How large is the multi-threaded performance gap?

A: AMD scores 36487 in the PassMark multithread test, compared to Intel's 30571. AMD leads by 19.4%.

Q: Does the Intel processor win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, Intel wins two of the 11 shared benchmarks: passmark_find_prime_numbers at 145 versus 130 (10.3% ahead) and passmark_physics at 1946 versus 1877 (3.5% ahead).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: AMD has an average benchmark score of 74496, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Intel has an average of 41914, placing it in the 88th percentile.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i7-14700T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 | Intel Core i7-14700T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 20 |

| Threads | 24 | 28 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.30 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-01-04T17:00:00.000Z | 2024-01-07T17:00:00.000Z |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |

| Part number | 100-000001683 | SRN41 |

The specification table confirms that the two processors target different design points. AMD combines fewer cores with a smaller process node and lower TDP, while Intel fields more cores and threads with a larger L3 cache and PCIe Gen 5 support. The shared boost clock of 5.20 GHz stands out as the only identical performance-related specification. The benchmark results indicate that AMD's architecture delivers higher throughput per core and per watt in most measured workloads, despite the core count disadvantage.