AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

The Verdict

The benchmark database positions the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 as the stronger all-round processor, winning 7 of 11 head-to-head comparisons against the Intel Core i5-14600. The AMD part posts a 94th percentile rank across all CPUs versus Intel’s 89th, and its average benchmark score of 74,496 towers over Intel’s 44,889. The AMD chip’s nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, sits only 0.2% higher in average score, while the Intel i5-14600’s closest competitor, the Intel Core i9-12900KS, is 0.5% above it. For mobile workloads, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is the clear pick, delivering a 3.2% single-thread advantage and a 1.8% multi-thread win. The Intel Core i5-14600, a desktop part with a 65 W TDP, counters with decisive leads in physics simulation (19.4% ahead) and prime number finding (16.1% ahead), making it the choice for those specific compute patterns. The data shows no universal winner; instead, the AMD chip suits general productivity and encryption-light tasks, while the Intel chip excels in legacy integer-heavy workloads.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 uses TSMC’s 4 nm process with the Zen 5 architecture (codenamed Gorgon Point), while the Intel Core i5-14600 relies on Intel’s 10 nm process with Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake-R). The AMD chip is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8, whereas Intel’s is a desktop CPU on Intel Socket 1700. AMD packs 12 cores and 24 threads; Intel offers 14 cores and 20 threads, reflecting a hybrid core design. Both reach a 5.20 GHz boost clock, but the AMD part starts at a 2.00 GHz base clock versus Intel’s 2.70 GHz. The AMD’s TDP is 28 W, less than half of Intel’s 65 W, a direct consequence of their different market segments.

Cache layouts diverge sharply. Both use 80 KB L1 per core, but AMD allocates 1 MB L2 per core and 16 MB L3 total, while Intel doubles L2 to 2 MB per core and provides 24 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip’s die size is 233 mm², smaller than Intel’s 257 mm². Memory support differs: AMD accepts DDR5 and LPDDR5X, offering 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with no recorded bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory. PCIe generations separate them further: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics also differ, with AMD’s Radeon 890M against Intel’s UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part, released on 2026-01-04, is newer than Intel’s 2024-01-07 launch, and its production status is active for both.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 scores 4,301 in PassMark single-thread tests, which is 3.2% higher than the Intel Core i5-14600’s 4,167.

Q: How do the two chips compare in multi-threaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins PassMark multithread with 36,487 versus Intel’s 35,848, a 1.8% margin. The AMD part also has more threads (24 vs. 20) despite having fewer cores (12 vs. 14).

Q: What is the largest performance gap in either direction?

A: The biggest AMD win is in extended instructions, where it scores 31,969 against Intel’s 25,674, a 24.5% lead. The biggest Intel win is in physics, where it scores 2,330 versus AMD’s 1,877, a 19.4% margin.

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has an average benchmark score of 74,496, compared to the Intel Core i5-14600’s 44,889. The AMD chip also ranks in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while Intel ranks in the 89th.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 and the Intel Core i5-14600 support ECC memory.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14600 uses Intel’s 10 nm process. AMD’s architecture is Zen 5 (Gorgon Point), Intel’s is Raptor Lake (Raptor Lake-R). Core counts differ: 12 cores for AMD, 14 for Intel. Thread counts favor AMD: 24 versus 20. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.70 GHz for Intel, although both boost to 5.20 GHz. TDP ratings are 28 W for AMD and 65 W for Intel. Sockets are AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. L2 cache is 1 MB per core on AMD, 2 MB per core on Intel; L3 cache is 16 MB on AMD versus 24 MB shared on Intel. Die sizes are 233 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel. Memory support: AMD handles DDR5 and LPDDR5X; Intel handles DDR4 and DDR5. AMD’s memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s; Intel’s is not recorded. PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: Radeon 890M for AMD, UHD Graphics 770 for Intel. Market segments are Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel. Release dates are 2026-01-04 for AMD and 2024-01-07 for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $255; AMD has no recorded launch MSRP. Part numbers are 100-000001683 for AMD and SRN44 for Intel. Both have locked multipliers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data reveals a clear split. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins in extended instructions by a wide margin: 31,969 versus 25,674, a 24.5% advantage. It also leads in integer math with 126,829 against 117,078, an 8.3% gain, and in data compression with 461,650 versus 434,620, a 6.2% lead. The AMD chip wins single-thread tests with 4,301 versus 4,167, a 3.2% edge, and takes multithread with 36,487 versus 35,848, a 1.8% margin. Random string sorting also goes to AMD: 48,894 versus 48,043, a 1.8% win.

The Intel Core i5-14600 counters in four tests. Its largest win is in physics, scoring 2,330 against AMD’s 1,877, a 19.4% gap. It also leads in find prime numbers with 155 versus 130, a 16.1% edge. Data encryption goes Intel’s way: 25,082 versus 23,132, a 7.8% margin. Floating point math also favors Intel, 85,759 versus 79,887, a 6.8% lead. These four wins are concentrated in specific compute patterns, while AMD’s seven wins cover a broader spread of workloads including memory-intensive and instruction-heavy tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins in scenarios that stress extended instruction sets, integer math, and data compression. Its 24.5% lead in extended instructions suggests a significant advantage for workloads that use newer CPU instruction extensions, such as certain encryption, compression, or scientific routines. The 8.3% integer math win and 6.2% data compression win reinforce its strength in general-purpose computing, database operations, and file archiving. The single-thread advantage of 3.2% means it also handles lightly threaded applications, such as office software or web browsing, with slightly higher responsiveness. Its multithread win, though narrow at 1.8%, combines with 24 threads to favor parallel productivity tasks like video editing or compilation, especially given the lower 28 W TDP that suits sustained mobile workloads.

The Intel Core i5-14600 wins where physics simulation and prime number calculation are central. Its 19.4% physics lead points to a strong showing in rigid-body or particle-based simulations, common in certain engineering and scientific applications. The 16.1% prime number advantage indicates faster integer iteration loops, which can benefit some cryptography or algorithmic trading workloads. Intel also leads in data encryption by 7.8%, a notable win for secure communication or disk encryption tasks. The floating point math lead of 6.8% suggests better performance in pure math libraries that rely heavily on floating-point operations, such as some financial modeling or rendering calculations. The Intel chip’s 14 cores and 20 threads, plus its 65 W desktop TDP, align it with stationary systems where power draw is less constrained and multi-core physics or math workloads are more common.