AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 and the Intel Core i5-110?

A: The AMD processor features 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor offers 6 cores and 12 threads. This gives the AMD part double the thread count of the Intel part.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel Core i5-110 has a higher base clock of 2.90 GHz but a lower boost clock of 4.30 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-110 has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory technologies do the two processors support?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s.

Q: How does the process node differ between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-110 is built on a 14 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core i5-110 has a TDP of 65 watts.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 and the Intel Core i5-110 represent fundamentally different architectural generations and design philosophies. The AMD part belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 series with the codename Gorgon Point, built on the Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitecture. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel part belongs to the Core i5 series with the codename Comet Lake, built on the older Comet Lake microarchitecture and fabricated on a 14 nm process at Intel.

The core configuration differs substantially. The AMD processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor has 6 cores and 12 threads. Cache hierarchies also diverge: the AMD chip provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 256 KB of L2 cache per core, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support reflects the generational gap. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel processor supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD processor uses the Radeon 890M, while the Intel processor uses the UHD Graphics 630. The market segments also differ: the AMD part is designed for mobile, while the Intel part is designed for desktop. The AMD processor uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses an Intel Socket 1200. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they are not unlocked for overclocking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 across multiple PassMark tests. The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which limits direct comparisons. However, the AMD processor's results can be interpreted against its nearest rivals to contextualize its performance.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 achieves an average benchmark score of 74496. This places it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, has an average score of 74640, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 scores 74761, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75373, which is 1.2% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75488, which is 1.3% higher. These small deltas indicate that the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 performs competitively with high-end desktop and workstation processors despite its 28-watt TDP.

In specific workloads, the AMD processor shows particular strengths. In the PassMark data compression test, it scores 461650. In data encryption, it scores 23132. In extended instructions, it scores 31969. In floating point math, it scores 79887. In integer math, it scores 126829. In multithreaded performance, it scores 36487. In physics, it scores 1877. In random string sorting, it scores 48894. In single-thread performance, it scores 4301.

The single-thread score of 4301 is notable, as it indicates strong per-core performance that is competitive with much higher-power desktop parts. The multithreaded score of 36487, combined with the average benchmark score of 74496, suggests that the 12-core, 24-thread configuration delivers substantial parallel throughput. The data compression score of 461650 is particularly high, indicating efficient use of the Zen 5 architecture for that workload.

The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores and a percentile rank of 50, with an average benchmark score of 0. This means the database contains no performance measurements for this processor, making direct head-to-head comparisons impossible from the recorded data. The absence of scores does not indicate a lack of capability, but it does prevent quantitative analysis of its performance relative to the AMD part.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors:

• Cores: 12 (AMD) vs 6 (Intel)
• Threads: 24 (AMD) vs 12 (Intel)
• Base Clock: 2.00 GHz (AMD) vs 2.90 GHz (Intel)
• Boost Clock: 5.20 GHz (AMD) vs 4.30 GHz (Intel)
• TDP: 28 watts (AMD) vs 65 watts (Intel)
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8 (AMD) vs Intel Socket 1200 (Intel)
• Architecture: Zen 5 (AMD) vs Comet Lake (Intel)
• Codename: Gorgon Point (AMD) vs Comet Lake (Intel)
• Generation: Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) (AMD) vs Core i5 (Comet Lake) (Intel)
• Process Node: 4 nm (AMD) vs 14 nm (Intel)
• Foundry: TSMC (AMD) vs Intel (Intel)
• Die Size: 233 mm² (AMD) vs not specified (Intel)
• L1 Cache: 80 KB per core (AMD) vs 64 KB per core (Intel)
• L2 Cache: 1 MB per core (AMD) vs 256 KB per core (Intel)
• L3 Cache: 16 MB (AMD) vs 12 MB shared (Intel)
• Memory Support: DDR5, LPDDR5X (AMD) vs DDR4 (Intel)
• Memory Bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s (AMD) vs 42.7 GB/s (Intel)
• ECC Memory: true (AMD) vs false (Intel)
• PCIe: Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) (AMD) vs Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) (Intel)
• Integrated Graphics: Radeon 890M (AMD) vs UHD Graphics 630 (Intel)
• Market Segment: Mobile (AMD) vs Desktop (Intel)
• Release Date: 2026-01-04 (AMD) vs 2025-09-10 (Intel)
• Part Number: 100-000001683 (AMD) vs SA35X (Intel)
• Percentile vs All CPUs: 94 (AMD) vs 50 (Intel)
• Average Benchmark Score: 74496 (AMD) vs 0 (Intel)
• Nearest Rivals: populated (AMD) vs empty (Intel)

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a clear separation between these two processors in terms of architecture generation, target market, and measured performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is a modern mobile processor built on a 4 nm process with 12 cores, 24 threads, a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and a 28-watt TDP. It supports DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, includes ECC support, and uses PCIe Gen 4. Its benchmark results place it in the 94th percentile, with an average score of 74496 that sits within 1.3% of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285.

The Intel Core i5-110 is a desktop processor built on the older 14 nm Comet Lake architecture with 6 cores, 12 threads, a boost clock of 4.30 GHz, and a 65-watt TDP. It supports DDR4 memory with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth, lacks ECC support, and uses PCIe Gen 3. The database contains no benchmark scores for this processor, and its percentile rank of 50 with an average score of 0 reflects that absence of recorded data.

From the available information, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is the higher-performing part, with a full set of benchmark measurements and a strong percentile position. Its nearest rivals, all of which score within 1.3% of it, are high-end desktop and workstation processors, which indicates that this mobile chip delivers competitive performance. The Intel Core i5-110 cannot be directly compared in benchmarks because no scores are recorded, so the data does not support a performance verdict for it.

The choice between these processors depends on platform requirements. The AMD part suits a mobile system with low power consumption, modern memory, and ECC support. The Intel part suits a desktop system with the Socket 1200 platform, DDR4 memory, and a higher base clock. The recorded data favors the AMD processor for measured performance, while the Intel processor's suitability must be judged on its specifications alone, as no benchmark results exist for it in the database.