AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Core i7-14700 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 and Intel Core i7-14700 represent two distinct approaches to high-performance computing, one designed for mobile efficiency and the other for desktop throughput. The recorded benchmark data shows a clear split: the Intel processor wins the majority of the head-to-head tests, while the AMD chip claims victory in a smaller set of specialized workloads. This analysis breaks down where each processor excels, the architectural reasoning behind those results, and the specific numerical differences from the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700 dominates the raw compute-heavy workloads. Of the 11 head-to-head comparisons recorded, Intel wins 8, while AMD wins 3. Intel’s strongest showings come in floating-point math, integer math, and prime number finding, where its larger core count and higher clock speeds deliver substantial margins. The Intel part also wins the multithreaded PassMark test by 9.5%, which aligns with its 20 cores and 28 threads versus AMD’s 12 cores and 24 threads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins in three specific areas: single-thread performance, extended instruction sets, and one of the two single-thread tests. The single-thread win is narrow at 1.5%, with scores of 4301 versus 4236, but it indicates that the Zen 5 architecture has a slight per-core advantage in lightly threaded tasks. The extended instructions win is more decisive at 12.6%, suggesting the AMD chip executes certain SIMD or specialized instruction paths more efficiently. These wins point to a processor that is optimized for responsiveness and specific acceleration features rather than brute-force parallel throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Gorgon Point codename, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i7-14700 uses Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, on Intel’s 10 nm process. The process node difference is significant: the smaller 4 nm node allows AMD to pack more transistors into a 233 mm² die, while Intel’s larger 257 mm² die uses a less dense process.

Core configurations differ sharply. The AMD chip has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel chip has 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost of 5.40 GHz. Intel’s higher physical core count is the primary driver of its multithreaded wins, while AMD’s boost clock is only 200 MHz lower, keeping it competitive in single-thread tests.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core, but the AMD part uses 1 MB of L2 per core while Intel uses 2 MB per core. The L3 cache differs dramatically: AMD has 16 MB total, while Intel has 33 MB shared. Intel’s larger shared L3 cache helps in workloads that reuse data across cores, while AMD’s smaller L3 is offset by its faster process node and memory bandwidth.

Memory support shows another split. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database records no specific bandwidth figure for the Intel part. Both support ECC memory, but AMD’s memory bus is optimized for mobile LPDDR5X, while Intel’s desktop platform accommodates older DDR4 for lower-cost builds.

The integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 890M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. AMD’s part is a mobile-class processor on Socket FP8, while Intel is a desktop part on Socket 1700. The PCIe capabilities also differ: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has an average benchmark score of 74496, while the Intel Core i7-14700 has an average of 52301. The AMD part also sits at the 94th percentile of all CPUs, compared to Intel’s 91st percentile.

Q: How do the two processors compare in multithreaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 wins the PassMark multithread test with a score of 40318 versus AMD’s 36487, a 9.5% advantage. Intel’s higher core and thread counts (20 cores, 28 threads versus 12 cores, 24 threads) drive this lead.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins the PassMark single-thread test with 4301 points against Intel’s 4236, a 1.5% margin. This indicates a slight per-core efficiency advantage for the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: Which processor is more efficient in specialized instruction workloads?

A: AMD wins the extended instructions test with a score of 31969 versus Intel’s 28388, a 12.6% advantage. This suggests better execution of SIMD or newer instruction set extensions.

Q: What are the biggest performance gaps between the two?

A: Intel’s largest wins are in floating-point math (106716 versus 79887, a 25.1% gap) and data encryption (29601 versus 23132, a 21.9% gap). AMD’s largest win is in extended instructions at 12.6%.

Q: What are the power and process differences?

A: The AMD part has a TDP of 28 watts on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel part has a TDP of 65 watts on a 10 nm Intel process. The AMD chip is designed for mobile use, while Intel is a desktop part.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 | Intel Core i7-14700 |

|----------------|---------------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 20 |

| Threads | 24 | 28 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The biggest Intel wins are concentrated in math and encryption workloads. In floating-point math, Intel scores 106716 against AMD’s 79887, a 25.1% lead. This is the largest delta in the entire benchmark set, reflecting Intel’s advantage in parallel floating-point execution. Integer math follows with Intel at 154535 versus AMD’s 126829, a 17.9% gap. Prime number finding shows Intel at 164 versus AMD’s 130, a 20.7% difference, and data encryption shows Intel at 29601 versus AMD’s 23132, a 21.9% gap. These results consistently favor Intel’s higher core count and higher boost clock.

Intel also wins the physics test with 2226 points versus AMD’s 1877, a 15.7% lead, and random string sorting with 54340 versus 48894, a 10% gap. Data compression goes to Intel at 498198 versus 461650, a 7.3% margin. The multithread test, often considered the overall throughput metric, goes to Intel at 40318 versus 36487, a 9.5% win.

AMD’s wins are narrower but distinct. The extended instructions test shows AMD at 31969 versus Intel’s 28388, a 12.6% advantage. This is AMD’s largest win and indicates a functional superiority in certain instruction paths. The single-thread test shows AMD at 4301 versus Intel’s 4236, a 1.5% margin, which is repeated in the duplicate singlethread entry. These wins, while smaller in number, demonstrate that the Zen 5 core has a per-thread efficiency edge that could matter in applications that are not fully parallelized.

The overall win count is 8 for Intel and 3 for AMD. The average benchmark scores, however, tell a different story: AMD’s average of 74496 is far higher than Intel’s 52301, largely because the AMD database includes a different set of tests with higher absolute scores. The head-to-head PassMark tests are the more direct comparison, and those favor Intel in most cases. The data suggests that for maximum multi-threaded throughput, the Intel part is superior, while the AMD part offers better single-thread responsiveness and specialized instruction execution.