AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 records an average benchmark score of 74496, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE records 32924. The AMD part sits in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, compared to the 83rd percentile for the Intel part.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 scores 4301 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 15.7% ahead of the Intel Core 5 213PTE's 3718. Both processors share the same 5.20 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the difference in multi-threaded performance?

A: In the PassMark multithread test, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 scores 36487 versus 25590 for the Intel Core 5 213PTE, a 42.6% advantage for the AMD processor.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Does the Intel processor win any benchmark tests?

A: Yes. The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins the PassMark find prime numbers test (157 vs 130, a 17.2% advantage) and the PassMark physics test (2199 vs 1877, a 14.6% advantage).

Q: What are the process nodes and sockets for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC and fits the AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses a 10 nm process from Intel and fits the Intel Socket 1700.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point. It belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The processor is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC and has a die size of 233 mm². It uses the AMD Socket FP8 and targets the mobile market segment. The integrated graphics are the Radeon 890M.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel and uses the Intel Socket 1700. The integrated graphics are the UHD Graphics 730. This processor targets the desktop market segment. The architecture field for the Intel part is not specified in the database.

Cache configurations differ between the two. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core.

Memory support also differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Power characteristics differ notably. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 45 watts. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins 9 of the 11 recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The largest margin comes in the PassMark extended instructions test, where the AMD processor scores 31969 versus 16146 for the Intel part, a 98% advantage. This test measures performance on specialized instruction sets, and the gap is substantial.

Data compression shows a 76.8% advantage for the AMD processor: 461650 versus 261083. Random string sorting follows at 62.4% in favor of AMD, with scores of 48894 and 30106 respectively. Data encryption shows a 60.5% edge for AMD, at 23132 versus 14413.

The multithread test gives AMD a 42.6% lead, with scores of 36487 and 25590. Integer math shows a 36.2% advantage for AMD, at 126829 versus 93109. Single-thread performance favors AMD by 15.7%, with scores of 4301 and 3718. Floating point math shows the smallest AMD win among the math tests, at 11.4%: 79887 versus 71722.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins the remaining two tests. In find prime numbers, Intel scores 157 against AMD's 130, a 17.2% advantage. In physics, Intel scores 2199 against AMD's 1877, a 14.6% advantage. These wins indicate that the Intel processor handles certain integer-heavy and physics simulation workloads more efficiently despite its lower core count.

The average benchmark scores place the AMD processor far ahead overall, but the Intel part is competitive in specific workloads. The AMD processor's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (0.2% higher average score), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 (0.4% higher), the AMD EPYC 4545P (1.2% higher), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (1.3% higher). The Intel Core 5 213PTE's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (0.3% lower), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (0.5% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (0.5% higher).

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields.

Cores and threads: The AMD processor has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel processor has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Base clock: The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 2.10 GHz. Both share a 5.20 GHz boost clock.

TDP: The AMD processor is rated at 28 watts. The Intel processor is rated at 45 watts.

Socket: The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node: The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process. The Intel processor uses a 10 nm process.

Foundry: The AMD processor is fabricated by TSMC. The Intel processor is fabricated by Intel.

Die size: The AMD processor has a die size of 233 mm². The Intel processor has no recorded die size.

L2 cache: The AMD processor has 1 MB per core. The Intel processor has 2 MB per core.

L3 cache: The AMD processor has 16 MB. The Intel processor has 24 MB shared.

Memory support: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Memory bandwidth: The AMD processor has 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor has 76.8 GB/s.

PCIe: The AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics: The AMD processor uses the Radeon 890M. The Intel processor uses the UHD Graphics 730.

Market segment: The AMD processor is for mobile. The Intel processor is for desktop.

Release date: The AMD processor was released on 2026-01-04. The Intel processor was released on 2026-03-08.

Launch MSRP: The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD processor has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 dominates the PassMark suite. It wins all math-heavy tests except find prime numbers, including integer math, floating point math, and extended instructions. It also wins data compression, data encryption, random string sorting, multithread, and single-thread tests. The 42.6% multithread advantage and the 36.2% integer math advantage show that the 12-core, 24-thread configuration delivers substantially higher throughput for parallel workloads. The 98% edge in extended instructions suggests a strong advantage for workloads that use specialized instruction sets.

The AMD processor also holds a significant single-thread advantage of 15.7%, which benefits responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, higher than the Intel part's 76.8 GB/s, supports memory-intensive tasks. The 28-watt TDP indicates this processor is designed for mobile platforms where power efficiency matters.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins two specific tests. The find prime numbers result (157 vs 130) shows a 17.2% advantage in a workload that relies heavily on integer arithmetic with certain branching patterns. The physics test (2199 vs 1877) shows a 14.6% advantage in physics simulation workloads. These wins suggest the Intel processor handles specific computational patterns more efficiently, despite having fewer cores.

The Intel processor also has a higher base clock (2.10 GHz vs 2.00 GHz) and a larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB). The PCIe Gen 5 interface provides newer connectivity options. The desktop market segment means this processor is intended for systems with more substantial cooling and power delivery. The Intel processor's nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700, has an average score only 0.1% higher, which places this part at the top of its performance tier.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly separates these two processors by workload class. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 delivers the higher overall performance, with an average benchmark score of 74496 versus 32924 for the Intel Core 5 213PTE. The AMD processor wins 9 of 11 head-to-head comparisons, including all the major throughput tests. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with the 4 nm process node and higher memory bandwidth, make it the stronger choice for multithreaded computing, data compression, encryption, and general math workloads.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in find prime numbers and physics simulations. Its 2 MB per-core L2 cache and 24 MB shared L3 cache, along with the higher base clock, contribute to these specific wins. The Intel processor also offers a PCIe Gen 5 interface and a launch MSRP of $221. The desktop market segment and 45-watt TDP indicate this processor is suited for full-size systems.

The data shows that the AMD processor belongs in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel processor sits in the 83rd percentile. The AMD processor's nearest rivals are high-end desktop and workstation parts, with the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X only 0.2% ahead in average score. The Intel processor's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12700 and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D, placing it in the upper mid-range desktop tier.

For users prioritizing raw throughput, multithreaded performance, and single-thread speed, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is the clear choice based on the recorded measurements. For users with workloads that match the Intel processor's specific strengths in prime number computation and physics simulation, the Intel Core 5 213PTE offers targeted advantages. The choice between these two processors depends on whether the workload aligns with the AMD processor's broad performance lead or the Intel processor's narrower but real wins in specific test categories.