AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear split between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 secures 10 wins across the head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core 5 213PE takes 5. The most dramatic margin belongs to AMD in the PassMark extended instructions test, where it posts a 61.8% advantage over Intel. That result, 31653 versus 19565, indicates a substantial difference in how the two chips handle specialized instruction workloads.

The AMD processor also dominates in memory and data-oriented tasks. In PassMark data compression, AMD scores 445719 against Intel's 298804, a 49.2% gap. Random string sorting shows a 52.1% difference in AMD's favor, with scores of 48723 and 32027 respectively. Data encryption follows the same pattern: AMD's 22252 beats Intel's 15916 by 39.8%. These are not small margins; they represent consistent, meaningfully higher throughput in workloads that rely on sustained parallel execution.

Multi-threaded performance broadly favors AMD. The PassMark multithread test shows 35148 versus 26434, a 33% lead. Integer math swings even further, with AMD at 122933 against Intel's 92089, a 33.5% edge. Floating point math is closer but still favors AMD, 76892 versus 68587, a 12.1% difference. Physics simulation, another heavily threaded workload, goes to AMD by 15.8% (1881 versus 1624). Even the prime number finding test, which often rewards raw integer throughput, shows AMD ahead by 10.5%, 126 versus 114.

Cinebench results tell a more nuanced story. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel actually wins by 3.1%, scoring 22468 against AMD's 21761. This is notable because the R23 multi-core test typically stresses all cores heavily. The Intel chip's higher base clock appears to compensate for its lower core count in this specific workload. However, in Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD wins decisively with 3409.5 versus 2264, a 50.6% advantage. The discrepancy between R15 and R23 results suggests the two chips scale differently as workload duration and intensity change.

Single-thread performance belongs to Intel across every test. Cinebench R23 single-core shows Intel at 3172 versus AMD's 2018, a massive 36.4% lead. Cinebench R15 single-core is closer but still Intel's, 319 versus 306.5, a 3.9% edge. PassMark single-thread also goes to Intel, 4060 versus 3973, a 2.1% difference. These results indicate Intel's per-core efficiency is superior, likely due to its higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz compared to AMD's 5.10 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD's Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the codename Strix Point. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel's Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm Intel process, and belongs to the Core 5 generation. The process node difference alone, 4 nm versus 10 nm, explains much of the efficiency gap between the two.

Core and thread counts diverge sharply. AMD offers 12 cores and 24 threads, while Intel provides 8 cores and 16 threads. This 50% core advantage for AMD underpins its multi-threaded wins. Cache structures also differ. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core, but AMD allocates 1 MB of L2 per core versus Intel's 2 MB per core. L3 cache is where Intel pulls ahead: 24 MB shared versus AMD's 16 MB. The larger L3 on Intel helps explain its strong single-thread and Cinebench R23 multi-core results, as more shared cache can reduce memory latency for frequently accessed data.

Memory support reveals another strategic divergence. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD's memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s, notably higher than Intel's 76.8 GB/s. Intel does offer ECC memory support, which AMD lacks. This positions Intel for reliability-sensitive workloads, while AMD's higher bandwidth targets throughput-heavy tasks.

PCIe generations also differ. AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The newer PCIe standard on Intel offers more bandwidth for future expansion devices. Integrated graphics differentiate the pair as well: AMD uses the Radeon 890M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The Radeon 890M is a substantially more capable iGPU, though the benchmark data does not include direct graphics comparisons.

Socket and market positioning further separate them. AMD uses Socket FP8 and targets the mobile segment, while Intel uses Socket 1700 and targets desktop. This explains the power envelope difference: AMD's TDP is 28 watts versus Intel's 65 watts. The 28 watt AMD chip delivers competitive multi-threaded performance at less than half the power budget, a direct result of the 4 nm process. Intel's 65 watt TDP reflects its desktop orientation and older 10 nm node.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. AMD's 50% advantage in both core and thread counts directly contributes to its multi-threaded benchmark wins.

Q: Why does Intel win the Cinebench R23 multi-core test despite having fewer cores?

A: Intel's Core 5 213PE scores 22468 versus AMD's 21761 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, a 3.1% advantage. The Intel chip has a higher base clock of 2.70 GHz versus 2.00 GHz on AMD, and a larger 24 MB shared L3 cache versus 16 MB. These factors help it overcome the core count deficit in this specific workload.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference between these two chips?

A: Intel wins all single-thread tests. Cinebench R23 single-core shows Intel at 3172 versus AMD's 2018, a 36.4% lead. Cinebench R15 single-core is closer, 319 versus 306.5, a 3.9% edge. PassMark single-thread shows 4060 versus 3973, a 2.1% difference. Intel's 5.20 GHz boost clock versus AMD's 5.10 GHz contributes to this advantage.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has a TDP of 65 watts. Despite the lower power budget, AMD wins most multi-threaded benchmarks, indicating significantly better performance per watt.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Intel Core 5 213PE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 does not. This makes Intel more suitable for error-sensitive workloads such as data integrity applications.

Q: What are the release dates for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 was released on 2024-06-30. The Intel Core 5 213PE has a release date of 2026-03-08. Both are currently marked as active in production.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Intel Core 5 213PE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 8 |

| Threads | 24 | 16 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Strix Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | Not specified |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 24 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Not supported | Supported |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2024-06-30 | 2026-03-08 |

| Part number | 100-000000994 | SA4QG |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 wins decisively in workloads that leverage many threads and high memory bandwidth. Data compression, encryption, integer math, and extended instructions all show AMD ahead by margins ranging from 10.5% to 61.8%. Its 12 cores and 24 threads provide the parallel execution capacity needed for these tasks. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, substantially higher than Intel's 76.8 GB/s, also plays a role in data-intensive operations. For users running multi-threaded productivity workloads, virtualization, or content creation tasks that scale across cores, AMD is the clear choice.

The Intel Core 5 213PE wins in single-thread-sensitive tasks and in the specific Cinebench R23 multi-core workload. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock and 24 MB shared L3 cache give it a per-core performance edge that shows up clearly in single-thread benchmarks. The 36.4% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core is particularly striking. For applications that are lightly threaded or that depend heavily on single-core responsiveness, Intel's higher clock speeds make it the stronger option. The Cinebench R23 multi-core win, despite AMD's core advantage, also suggests Intel performs well in rendering workloads of moderate duration.

The power envelope difference cannot be ignored. AMD's 28 watt TDP versus Intel's 65 watt TDP means AMD achieves most of its multi-threaded wins while consuming less than half the power budget. This makes AMD particularly suited for thermally constrained environments, which aligns with its mobile market segment. Intel's desktop orientation and higher power allowance enable its clock speed advantages but at a significant efficiency cost.

ECC memory support gives Intel an edge in data integrity-focused deployments. The PCIe Gen 5 support on Intel also offers newer connectivity standards. AMD counters with a more capable integrated GPU, the Radeon 890M, and higher memory bandwidth. The die size of 233 mm² on AMD, built on a 4 nm process, reflects a denser, more modern design compared to Intel's 10 nm node.

The Verdict

The data indicates two processors optimized for different priorities. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 delivers superior multi-threaded performance across most tests, with 10 wins out of 15 head-to-head comparisons. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, and higher memory bandwidth make it the stronger choice for parallel workloads. The 28 watt TDP, less than half of Intel's 65 watt budget, amplifies this advantage in efficiency-sensitive scenarios. The 233 mm² die on a 4 nm process represents a compact, modern design that achieves competitive performance at low power.

The Intel Core 5 213PE excels in single-thread performance, winning all single-thread tests with margins up to 36.4%. Its higher clocks and larger L3 cache deliver per-core responsiveness that AMD cannot match. The Cinebench R23 multi-core win, 22468 versus 21761, shows Intel can hold its own in at least one heavily threaded workload. ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity add reliability and forward-looking features. The 65 watt TDP, while higher, is appropriate for its desktop market segment.

The average benchmark scores capture the overall balance: AMD sits at 37904, Intel at 35428. AMD's percentile rank among all CPUs is 86, versus Intel's 85. The nearest rivals for each chip reinforce their positioning. AMD's closest competitors include the Intel Core i9-14901E and AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, while Intel's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13700T and Core i7-12700KF. These comparisons place both chips in similar performance tiers despite their architectural differences.

The release timeline also matters. AMD launched on 2024-06-30, while Intel's release date is 2026-03-08. The Intel chip is a newer product, but it uses an older 10 nm process. AMD's 4 nm process, produced by TSMC, enables its efficiency advantages. The Intel Core 5 213PE carries a launch MSRP of $221, though pricing analysis is beyond the scope of this comparison.

The choice between these two depends on workload priorities. For multi-threaded throughput, data processing, and power efficiency, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the stronger performer. For single-thread responsiveness, ECC memory support, and desktop-oriented connectivity, the Intel Core 5 213PE has clear advantages. The benchmark data does not identify a single superior chip; it identifies two different performance profiles serving different use cases.