AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 465

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 213PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,672.5
2,264
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
247
319
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
17,462.5
22,468
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,996.5
3,172
passmark_data_compression
349,463
298,804
passmark_data_encryption
17,601
15,916
passmark_extended_instructions
24,773
19,565
passmark_find_prime_numbers
124
114
passmark_floating_point_math
62,411
68,587
passmark_integer_math
99,156
92,089
passmark_multithread
28,986
26,434
passmark_physics
1,689
1,624
passmark_random_string_sorting
37,379
32,027
passmark_single_thread
3,750
4,060
passmark_singlethread
3,750
4,060
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,436
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,332

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Intel Core 5 213PE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data shows a clear split between multi-threaded throughput and single-thread responsiveness. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 wins 9 of the 15 shared benchmarks, while the Intel Core 5 213PE takes 6. The margins tell the story: AMD's victories are often substantial, while Intel's are concentrated in single-core and floating-point workloads.

The largest win for the AMD processor comes in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where it scores 2672.5 against Intel's 2264, a delta of 18%. The data compression test shows a 17% advantage (349463 vs 298804), and random string sorting favors AMD by 16.7% (37379 vs 32027). Extended instructions deliver AMD's biggest percentage margin at 26.6% (24773 vs 19565). Data encryption is 10.6% faster on AMD (17601 vs 15916), multithread performance is 9.7% ahead (28986 vs 26434), and prime number finding shows an 8.8% edge (124 vs 114). Integer math is 7.7% higher on AMD (99156 vs 92089), and physics simulation is 4% ahead (1689 vs 1624).

The Intel processor counters with decisive single-core wins. Cinebench R23 single-core shows Intel at 3172 versus AMD's 1996.5, a 37.1% gap. Cinebench R15 single-core gives Intel a 22.6% edge (319 vs 247). PassMark single-thread performance favors Intel by 7.6% (4060 vs 3750). Cinebench R23 multi-core is the notable exception to AMD's multi-thread dominance: Intel scores 22468 against AMD's 17462.5, a 22.3% advantage. Floating-point math also goes to Intel by 9% (68587 vs 62411).

The average benchmark scores place AMD at 43431 versus Intel's 35428, a difference of roughly 22.6%. AMD's percentile ranking sits at 88 among all CPUs, while Intel sits at 85. AMD's nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 (delta 0.2%), Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (delta 0.5%), AMD Ryzen 7 170 (delta -0.6%), and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 (delta -0.6%). Intel's nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13700T (delta 0.1%), Intel Core i7-12700KF (delta 0.2%), Intel Core i5-13600T (delta 0.3%), and Intel Core i7-12700K (delta 0.4%).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE, with a score of 3172 versus the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465's 1996.5, a 37.1% advantage.

Q: How large is AMD's lead in the data compression test?

A: AMD scores 349463 against Intel's 298804, a 17% advantage.

Q: What is the difference in PassMark multithread performance?

A: AMD scores 28986 and Intel scores 26434, giving AMD a 9.7% lead.

Q: Does the Intel processor win any multi-core test?

A: Yes, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 22468 versus AMD's 17462.5, a 22.3% advantage.

Q: How do the two processors compare in overall average benchmark score?

A: AMD has an average benchmark score of 43431, while Intel has 35428.

Q: Which processor has the higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: AMD ranks at the 88th percentile, while Intel ranks at the 85th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The die size is 233 mm². The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process by Intel, and belongs to the Core 5 generation.

Core counts differ: AMD provides 10 cores and 20 threads, while Intel provides 8 cores and 16 threads. AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Intel's base clock is 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The thermal design power differs significantly: AMD is rated at 28 W, Intel at 65 W.

Cache layouts diverge in L2 and L3. Both use 80 KB L1 per core. AMD uses 1 MB L2 per core and 16 MB L3. Intel uses 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel access and a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel access and a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. AMD does not support ECC memory; Intel does.

AMD's integrated graphics is the Radeon 880M, while Intel uses the UHD Graphics 730. AMD runs on AMD Socket FP8, and Intel runs on Intel Socket 1700. AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes; Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. AMD's market segment is mobile, while Intel's is desktop. Both processors are active in production and both have locked multipliers. AMD's part number is 100-000001861, and Intel's is SA4QG. Intel has a launch MSRP of $221; AMD has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The benchmark data supports a clear functional split. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is the stronger multi-threaded processor in most measured workloads, with wins in 9 of 15 head-to-head tests, a higher average benchmark score (43431 vs 35428), and a higher percentile ranking (88 vs 85). The Intel Core 5 213PE is the stronger single-core performer, with substantial wins in both Cinebench single-core tests and PassMark single-thread tests, plus a notable win in Cinebench R23 multi-core.

The AMD processor uses a 28 W TDP with 10 cores and 20 threads, making it suited for throughput-oriented mobile workloads. The Intel processor uses a 65 W TDP with 8 cores and 16 threads, and its single-core margins are large enough to matter for latency-sensitive desktop tasks. Intel's Cinebench R23 single-core score is 37.1% higher, which is the largest margin recorded in either direction across all shared benchmarks. AMD's largest margin is 26.6% in extended instructions.

The processors serve different sockets, different memory types (AMD supports LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 alongside DDR5), and different market segments. The data does not indicate a universal winner. It indicates two processors with distinct strengths, and the recorded scores show which workloads favor which design.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in every major specification category. AMD offers 10 cores and 20 threads; Intel offers 8 cores and 16 threads. AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a 5.00 GHz boost; Intel's base clock is 2.70 GHz with a 5.20 GHz boost. AMD's TDP is 28 W; Intel's is 65 W. AMD uses AMD Socket FP8; Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.

AMD's architecture is Zen 5 with the Gorgon Point codename; Intel's architecture is not listed, with the Bartlett Lake codename. The process nodes differ: 4 nm for AMD (TSMC foundry) versus 10 nm for Intel (Intel foundry). The die size is 233 mm² for AMD, with no recorded die size for Intel.

Cache configurations: both use 80 KB L1 per core. AMD uses 1 MB L2 per core with 16 MB L3. Intel uses 2 MB L2 per core with 24 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X; Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 76.8 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory is not supported on AMD but is supported on Intel.

PCIe generations differ: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes; Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 880M on AMD versus UHD Graphics 730 on Intel. Market segments differ: mobile for AMD, desktop for Intel. Release dates differ: AMD's recorded release is 2025-12-31 and Intel's is 2026-03-08. Intel has a launch MSRP of $221; AMD has none recorded.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 wins in throughput-oriented workloads. Data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, integer math, multithread performance, physics simulation, random string sorting, and Cinebench R15 multi-core all favor AMD. The margins range from 4% in physics to 26.6% in extended instructions. AMD's average benchmark score is 22.6% higher than Intel's, and its percentile ranking is 3 points higher.

The Intel Core 5 213PE wins in single-core and floating-point workloads. Cinebench R23 single-core, Cinebench R15 single-core, PassMark single-thread, Cinebench R23 multi-core, and floating-point math all favor Intel. The single-core margins are particularly large: 37.1% in Cinebench R23 single-core and 22.6% in Cinebench R15 single-core. Intel also wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 22.3%, which is the only multi-core test where Intel leads.

The use-case split follows the data. The AMD processor is the better choice for compression, encryption, integer-heavy general compute, and extended instruction workloads. The Intel processor is the better choice for single-thread latency, floating-point math, and the specific Cinebench R23 multi-core workload. The socket, memory, and market segment differences reinforce this split: AMD targets mobile with LPDDR5X support and a 28 W TDP, while Intel targets desktop with DDR4/DDR5 support, ECC capability, PCIe Gen 5, and a 65 W TDP.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 465
5 213PE
Core Specs
Cores
10
8 -20.0%
Threads
20
16 -20.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.7 +35.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.7 +35.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Multiplier
20
27 +35.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Gorgon Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 6
—
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 880M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$221
Part Number
100-000001861
SA4QG
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 9 465 Details View Core 5 213PE Details