AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

CORE STATE Strix Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 213PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,842
2,264
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
303
319
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,698
22,468
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,992
3,172
geekbench_multicore
13,760
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
2,253
N/A
passmark_data_compression
354,510
298,804
passmark_data_encryption
18,297
15,916
passmark_extended_instructions
25,113
19,565
passmark_find_prime_numbers
117
114
passmark_floating_point_math
62,802
68,587
passmark_integer_math
101,831
92,089
passmark_multithread
29,467
26,434
passmark_physics
1,704
1,624
passmark_random_string_sorting
39,447
32,027
passmark_single_thread
3,841
4,060
passmark_singlethread
3,841
4,060
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,436
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,332

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 5 213PE

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data splits the two processors along clear workload lines. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 takes 9 of the 15 head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core 5 213PE wins 6. That split is not random: the AMD part dominates data-heavy and encryption-heavy tasks, while the Intel part takes the lead in rendering and single-threaded workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 shows its strength in PassMark's data compression test, scoring 354510 against 298804 for the Intel chip, a 18.6% advantage. Data encryption follows the same pattern, with the AMD part at 18297 versus 15916, a 15% lead. The extended instructions test, which measures SIMD and vector workload throughput, also favors AMD at 25113 versus 19565, a 28.4% margin. Integer math goes to AMD as well, 101831 versus 92089, a 10.6% win. Random string sorting, a memory-latency-sensitive test, shows AMD ahead at 39447 versus 32027, a 23.2% gap. The multithread PassMark score favors AMD at 29467 versus 26434, an 11.5% lead, and the physics test goes AMD's way at 1704 versus 1624, a 4.9% margin. Even the prime number test, a narrow 2.6% win at 117 versus 114, goes to the AMD part.

The Intel Core 5 213PE counters in Cinebench. The R23 multicore result is a decisive 22468 versus 18698, a 16.8% lead for Intel. The R23 singlecore result is even more lopsided: 3172 versus 1992, a 37.2% advantage. R15 singlecore goes Intel's way at 319 versus 303, a 5% margin, while R15 multicore is the one Cinebench test AMD wins, 2842 versus 2264, a 25.5% margin. PassMark floating point math favors Intel at 68587 versus 62802, an 8.4% lead, and single-thread PassMark goes Intel's way at 4060 versus 3841, a 5.4% gap.

The pattern is consistent: AMD wins compression, encryption, integer, and most multithreaded PassMark tests; Intel wins Cinebench rendering, single-thread performance, and floating-point math. The average benchmark scores reflect the overall balance: AMD sits at 40048, Intel at 35428, a difference of roughly 13% in the AMD part's favor. AMD's percentile rank is 87 against all CPUs, while Intel sits at 85.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward split by use case. For workloads dominated by data compression, encryption, integer math, and general multithreaded throughput, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the stronger choice. It wins 9 of the 15 head-to-head tests, and its average benchmark score of 40048 is well ahead of Intel's 35428.

For rendering workloads in Cinebench, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the clear winner. The R23 multicore result of 22468 versus 18698 is a substantial 16.8% lead, and the R23 singlecore result of 3172 versus 1992 is a massive 37.2% advantage. Anyone prioritizing Cinebench-style rendering or single-threaded responsiveness should favor the Intel part.

The AMD part also holds a meaningful advantage in memory bandwidth, with 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for Intel. That helps explain the AMD wins in data compression and random string sorting, both of which are sensitive to memory throughput. The Intel part counters with a larger L3 cache, 24 MB shared versus 16 MB, and a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus 5.00 GHz.

The production status for both is Active. The AMD part targets mobile with a 28 W TDP and an integrated Radeon 880M GPU, while the Intel part is a desktop chip with a 65 W TDP and UHD Graphics 730. The Intel part launched with a launch MSRP of $221.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single win for either side is the Cinebench R23 singlecore test, where Intel leads by 37.2%. That result, 3172 versus 1992, is the most dramatic gap in the entire comparison. It indicates a significant single-thread performance advantage for the Intel architecture, which also shows in the R15 singlecore test at 5% and the PassMark single-thread test at 5.4%.

AMD's largest win is the Cinebench R15 multicore test at 25.5%, scoring 2842 against 2264. That is notable because it is the only Cinebench multicore test AMD wins; in R23 multicore, the newer Intel part turns the tables with a 16.8% lead. The R15 result may reflect different scaling characteristics in the older test version, but the recorded data clearly favors AMD there.

In the PassMark suite, AMD's extended instructions win of 28.4% is the biggest margin, followed by random string sorting at 23.2% and data compression at 18.6%. Data encryption adds another 15% win. These four tests all involve heavy data movement or vector processing, and AMD wins all of them by double digits.

Intel's floating point math win of 8.4% is its only PassMark victory beyond the single-thread tests. The floating point result, 68587 versus 62802, shows Intel handling FP-heavy math more efficiently despite losing the integer math test by 10.6%. The prime number test is the closest result of the entire comparison, with AMD winning by just 2.6% at 117 versus 114.

The multithread PassMark score of 29467 for AMD versus 26434 for Intel, an 11.5% lead, aligns with AMD's higher core and thread counts: 10 cores and 20 threads versus 8 cores and 16 threads. The physics test also favors AMD by 4.9%.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark tests?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins 9 of the 15 head-to-head tests. The Intel Core 5 213PE wins 6.

Q: How large is the single-core performance gap?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE leads by 37.2% in Cinebench R23 singlecore (3172 versus 1992), by 5% in Cinebench R15 singlecore (319 versus 303), and by 5.4% in PassMark single-thread (4060 versus 3841).

Q: Which processor has better multithreaded performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins the PassMark multithread test by 11.5% (29467 versus 26434) and the Cinebench R15 multicore test by 25.5% (2842 versus 2264). However, the Intel Core 5 213PE wins Cinebench R23 multicore by 16.8% (22468 versus 18698).

Q: How do the two processors compare in memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has 76.8 GB/s. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has an average benchmark score of 40048 and ranks in the 87th percentile. The Intel Core 5 213PE has an average score of 35428 and ranks in the 85th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 233 mm². It belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which uses a hybrid arrangement of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The socket is AMD Socket FP8, and the chip carries the Radeon 880M integrated GPU.

The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The generation is listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the integrated GPU is UHD Graphics 730.

Cache layouts differ between the two. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. The Intel part also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core and provides 24 MB of shared L3. The larger Intel L3 cache may contribute to its single-thread wins.

Clock speeds favor Intel slightly. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Power targets differ substantially. The AMD part is rated at 28 W TDP, reflecting its mobile market segment. The Intel part is rated at 65 W TDP and targets the desktop segment. The AMD part supports dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part also uses dual-channel memory but with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports ECC memory; the AMD part does not.

PCIe support also differs. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 support provides a newer interface for expansion devices.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part launched on 2024-06-30, while the Intel part has a release date of 2026-03-08. The Intel part's launch MSRP is $221.

In the nearest rival comparisons, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 sits within 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, Intel Core 5 221E, AMD Ryzen 9 270, and Intel Core i9-13905H. The Intel Core 5 213PE sits within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-13700T, Intel Core i7-12700KF, Intel Core i5-13600T, and Intel Core i7-12700K. Those proximity values confirm that both chips occupy similar performance tiers, even though their workload-specific strengths differ sharply.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 365
5 213PE
Core Specs
Cores
10
8 -20.0%
Threads
20
16 -20.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.7 +35.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.7 +35.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Multiplier
20
27 +35.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Strix Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 6
—
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 880M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$221
Part Number
100-000001530
SA4QG
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 9 365 Details View Core 5 213PE Details