AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE vs Intel Core 5 211E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Core 5 211E provides a full benchmark profile, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has no individual benchmark scores in the database. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 37,829 places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show a tightly clustered field: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 (0.1% higher), the the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37,762 (0.2% higher), while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904 (0.2% lower) and the Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37,911 (0.2% lower). The Intel Core 5 211E effectively sits within a 0.4% band of these four competitors.

In Cinebench testing, the Intel Core 5 211E delivers a multicore score of 8,563 in C20 and 20,389 in R23. Its single-core results reach 1,208 in R20 and 2,878 in R23. The the R15 test shows a multicore score of 2,055 and a single-core score of 289. The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths: the multithread score is 23,833, single-thread score is 4,006, integer math reaches 88,117, and floating point math hits 66,402. Data compression scores 346,757, while encryption scores 17,938. Extended instructions score 21,592, and random string sorting scores 34,308. Physics testing returns 702, and the prime number search returns 43.

The AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores, so no head-to-head wins can be quantified for either processor. The database shows zero wins for each side in direct comparison. The Intel part's percentile ranking of 86 places it well above the AMD part's percentile ranking of 50, indicating a substantial gap in overall performance positioning. The Intel part's average score of 37,829 is the only average score recorded, and it is essentially identical to its nearest rivals, all within 0.2% of each other. The AMD part's average score is 0, meaning no performance data exists to compare directly.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation built on a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 257 mm². The AMD part uses a smaller process node and a smaller die.

Core counts differ: the AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 10 cores and 16 threads. Both processors support 16 threads, but the Intel part achieves this with two additional physical cores. Base clocks differ significantly: the AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost, while the Intel part runs at 2.70 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost. The AMD part has a higher boost clock by 0.20 GHz, but the Intel part has a higher base clock by 0.70 GHz.

Cache hierarchies are distinct. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 2 MB per core. The AMD part has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel part has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part holds a substantial advantage in total cache capacity, particularly in L3 where it has 12 MB more.

Memory support differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD part provides higher memory bandwidth by 12.8 GB/s. Both parts support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation and more lanes. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses a Radeon 860M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part uses an AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part's TDP is 35 watts, while the Intel part's TDP is 65 watts, a 30-watt difference. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221; the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The AMD part was released on 2026-03-01, while the Intel part was released on 2025-01-12. Both parts are active in production and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part number is 100-000001921, and the Intel part number is SRQERQ65F.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211E wins in every measurable benchmark category because it is the only part with recorded data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20,389 and single-core score of 2,878 show balanced performance. The PassMark multithread score of 23,833 and single-thread score of 4,006 confirm this balance. Integer math at 88,117 and floating point math at 66,402 indicate strong arithmetic throughput. Data compression at 346,757 is particularly high, suggesting strong performance in storage and archive workloads. Data encryption at 17,938 and extended instructions at 21,592 show capable cryptographic and SIMD performance.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has no recorded benchmark scores, so its wins cannot be established from the data. Its architectural specifications suggest potential advantages: a smaller 4 nm process node, a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz, higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and a lower TDP of 35 watts. These characteristics point toward efficiency and single-thread burst performance, but no measured data confirms this. The Intel part's 10 cores and 20 MB of L3 cache provide a structural advantage in cache-heavy workloads. The Intel part's Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes offers more expansion bandwidth. The AMD part's 8 cores with a 5.10 GHz boost clock may deliver competitive single-thread performance, but the database records no scores to verify this.

The Intel part's 86th percentile ranking versus the AMD part's 50th percentile ranking shows a clear overall positioning gap. The Intel part's average score of 37,829 places it among the top 14% of all CPUs in the database. The AMD part's average score of 0 means it has no recorded performance data. The Intel part's nearest rivals all score within 0.2% of its average, indicating that the Core 5 211E is tightly competitive with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, and the Intel Core i9-14901E.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has 8 cores. Both parts have 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 211E has a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The AMD part is 0.20 GHz higher.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 211E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has 12 MB more.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE supports 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, while the Intel Core 5 211E supports 76.8 GB/s. The AMD part is 12.8 GB/s higher.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core 5 211E has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD part uses 30 watts less.

Q: What is the Intel Core 5 211E's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has an average benchmark score of 37,829 and sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, scores 37,804, which is 0.1% higher.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear situation: the Intel Core 5 211E has a complete benchmark profile, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has no recorded scores. The Intel part's average score of 37,829 and 86th percentile ranking establish it as a high-performing desktop processor. Its 10 cores, 20 MB of L3 cache, and 65-watt TDP position it for sustained multicore workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20,389 and PassMark multithread score of 23,833 confirm strong parallel performance. The single-thread score of 4,006 in PassMark and 2,878 in Cinebench R23 show that it does not sacrifice single-core responsiveness.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE offers a different architectural profile: 8 cores on a 4 nm process with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and a 35-watt TDP. These specifications suggest a design focused on efficiency and burst performance. The smaller process node and lower TDP indicate potential advantages in power-constrained environments. The higher boost clock could translate to strong single-thread performance, but the database contains no measurements to verify this.

The Intel Core 5 211E is the only processor with measured performance data, so it is the only one that can be recommended based on benchmark results. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.2% of its average score, show that it is competitive with the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, and the Intel Core i9-14901E. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE cannot be evaluated on performance grounds because no data exists. The Intel part's 10 cores and larger cache make it the choice for multicore and cache-sensitive workloads. The AMD part's lower TDP and higher boost clock make it a candidate for efficiency-focused builds, but this remains unverified by recorded benchmarks.