AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14400F is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark data. The database shows no test results for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE, meaning the head-to-head comparison is entirely one-sided in terms of available measurements. The i5-14400F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and a single-core score of 3055. In Geekbench, it records 11268 multi-core and 2058 single-core. PassMark results include 25470 for multithread and 3701 for single-thread performance.

The i5-14400F's average benchmark score of 32279 places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U scores 32233 (0.1% slower), the Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32226 (0.2% slower), the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS scores 32354 (0.2% faster), and the Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32121 (0.5% slower). This clustering indicates the i5-14400F sits at the top of a very competitive performance band, with no rival in its immediate vicinity exceeding a half-percent difference.

Since the AMD processor has no benchmark entries, the comparison cannot show any wins for it. The data confirms the i5-14400F as the measured performer, but the absence of AMD results leaves the overall picture incomplete.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14400F uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip is based on the Gorgon Point codename with a Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation label using Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel chip uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename from the Core 14th Gen series.

Core counts differ meaningfully. The AMD processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor has 10 cores and 16 threads. Both support the same thread count, but Intel achieves it with more physical cores. Cache configurations also diverge. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3. The larger Intel L3 cache is shared across all cores, while the AMD L3 is a smaller pool.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel chip has a higher base clock of 2.50 GHz but a lower boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The AMD part can reach a higher maximum frequency, while the Intel part starts from a higher baseline.

Memory support separates the two clearly. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but the database records no bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities also differ: the AMD chip offers Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The AMD processor includes integrated Radeon 860M graphics. The Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, which the database marks as N/A. This is a major functional difference for systems without a discrete GPU. Socket compatibility also diverges: the AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM5, and the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD die measures 195 mm², while the Intel die measures 215 mm².

Power characteristics differ substantially. The AMD processor has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD part draws significantly less power in its thermal design. The Intel chip's launch MSRP is $196; the AMD chip's launch MSRP is not recorded. Both are locked multipliers. The AMD part has part number 100-000001921, and the Intel part has part number SRN3RSRN47. The AMD release date is March 2026, while the Intel release date is January 2024.

The Verdict

The data supports different conclusions depending on what the measurement priorities are. For raw measured performance, the Intel Core i5-14400F is the only option with benchmark results, and those results are strong. Its 83rd percentile ranking and tight grouping with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, Intel Core i9-11900, AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, and Intel Core i7-12800H show that it performs at a high level relative to the broader CPU market.

For power efficiency, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has the advantage on paper. Its 35 watt TDP versus the Intel chip's 65 watt TDP indicates significantly lower thermal requirements. The AMD chip also includes integrated Radeon 860M graphics, which the Intel chip lacks entirely. For a system that needs graphics output without a discrete GPU, the AMD processor is the functional choice.

For memory flexibility, the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The AMD chip offers a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip has no recorded bandwidth figure. For PCIe expansion, the Intel chip's Gen 5 with 16 lanes exceeds the AMD chip's Gen 4 with 12 lanes.

The verdict depends on what the system needs. The Intel chip is the only one with measured performance data, and it performs well. The AMD chip offers a lower TDP, integrated graphics, and a newer process node. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel chip has a recorded launch MSRP of $196, while the AMD chip's price is not listed.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two processors differ according to the database.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE | Intel Core i5-14400F |

|---|---|---|

| Series | null | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | null | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | null |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 860M | N/A |

| Release Date | 2026-03-01 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | null | $196 |

| Part Number | 100-000001921 | SRN3RSRN47 |

| Percentile Vs All CPUs | 50 | 83 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 32279 |

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: Does the AMD processor include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE includes Radeon 860M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE supports PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has a TDP of 65 watts.

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14400F's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279 and sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i5-14400F's boost clock of 4.70 GHz.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400F wins in every category where measured data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21645 and single-core score of 3055 are concrete numbers. Its Geekbench multi-core score of 11268 and single-core score of 2058 add another layer. PassMark results show 25470 for multithread and 3701 for single-thread. The i5-14400F also wins on physical core count with 10 cores versus 8, on L2 cache with 1.25 MB per core versus 1 MB per core, on L3 cache with 20 MB shared versus 8 MB, on PCIe with Gen 5 and 16 lanes versus Gen 4 and 12 lanes, and on memory flexibility with DDR4 and DDR5 support versus DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE wins on the characteristics that favor efficiency and integration. Its 35 watt TDP is nearly half the Intel chip's 65 watt TDP. Its 4 nm TSMC process node is smaller than Intel's 10 nm node. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz exceeds the Intel chip's 4.70 GHz. Its LPDDR5X memory support adds a mobile-oriented option. Its integrated Radeon 860M graphics provide display output without a discrete GPU. Its recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s gives it a measurable advantage in that category, since the Intel chip has no recorded bandwidth figure. Its die size of 195 mm² is smaller than the Intel chip's 215 mm². Its 2026 release date makes it the newer design.

The use-case split is straightforward. A builder prioritizing measured performance, higher core counts, larger cache, and PCIe Gen 5 expansion should look at the Intel Core i5-14400F. A builder prioritizing low power draw, integrated graphics, a smaller process node, and newer memory options should look at the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE. The database currently holds no benchmark results for the AMD part, so its actual performance remains unmeasured in this comparison.