AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-14700T wins all 11 recorded head-to-head comparisons against the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440. The largest margin comes in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where Intel scores 145 against AMD's 77, a 88.3% advantage. That is a massive lead for a workload that stresses integer throughput and cache hierarchy. Floating point math also heavily favors Intel: 79042 versus 42934, a 84.1% gap, indicating the i7-14700T's higher core count and larger L3 cache make a decisive difference in sustained arithmetic workloads.

Data encryption shows a 71.3% delta (21277 versus 12418), and integer math follows at 72.5% (113854 versus 65991). These are not marginal wins; the Intel part is delivering roughly three-quarters more throughput in these compute-heavy tasks. Physics simulation, as measured by PassMark, gives Intel a 73.9% lead (1946 versus 1119), reinforcing the pattern that multi-threaded and SIMD-heavy workloads strongly favor the 20-core Intel chip. Multithread performance overall is 45.2% higher for Intel (30571 versus 21054), which is the headline result for anyone running parallel workloads like rendering or compilation.

The closest contest is in single-thread performance. Intel scores 3905 versus AMD's 3785, a modest 3.2% advantage. That is worth noting because it shows the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440's Zen 5 cores are competitive on a per-thread basis, even if they cannot overcome the Intel part's raw core count. Data compression also lands in Intel's favor by 38.1% (354216 versus 256420), and random string sorting goes to Intel by 41.4% (38546 versus 27252). Extended instructions, which test AVX and similar workloads, show a smaller but still clear 8.6% Intel win (20052 versus 18456).

In the aggregate, the i7-14700T posts an average benchmark score of 41914 against the AMD's 41208. That puts the Intel chip at the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD part sits at the 87th percentile. Interestingly, both processors land among similar company in their nearest rivals: the Intel chip is within 0.6% of the Intel Core 7 251TE and 0.3% of the Intel Core i7-12850HX, while the AMD chip is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (0% delta) and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H. Neither part is an outlier in its performance class, but the head-to-head delta is consistently in Intel's favor.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core i7-14700T is built on Raptor Lake architecture (Raptor Lake-R refresh) using Intel's 10 nm process, with a die size of 257 mm². It is a desktop part, designed for Socket 1700, with a 35 W TDP. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses Zen 5 architecture (codenamed Gorgon Point) on TSMC's 4 nm process, with a smaller 195 mm² die. It is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP8 with a 28 W TDP. The process node difference (10 nm versus 4 nm) gives AMD a density and efficiency advantage on paper, but the benchmark scores show that Intel's larger chip and higher power envelope translate into more raw performance.

Core counts differ dramatically. The Intel part has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads. That is a 3.3x core advantage for Intel, and it directly explains the multi-thread benchmark results. The Intel chip also has a higher boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 4.80 GHz) and a higher base clock is on the AMD side (2.00 GHz versus 1.30 GHz). Cache configurations are also very different: Intel provides 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while AMD provides 1 MB of L2 per core and only 8 MB of L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The larger Intel L3 cache is likely a major factor in the data compression and integer math results.

Memory support diverges as well. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, while the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also dual-channel, with a rated memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. PCIe generation differs: Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, AMD offers Gen 4 with the same lane count. Integrated graphics are present on both, with Intel's UHD Graphics 770 versus AMD's Radeon 840M. The AMD part is newer by release date (2026-01-04 versus 2024-01-07), but that does not translate into a performance win in these benchmarks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better multi-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T is 45.2% ahead in the PassMark multithread test (30571 versus 21054). With 20 cores and 28 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads, the Intel part dominates parallel workloads.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 competitive in single-thread tasks?

A: It is close. The Intel chip leads by only 3.2% in PassMark single-thread (3905 versus 3785). For single-threaded applications, the two are nearly equivalent, so the AMD part is not a weak choice there.

Q: Which processor has the larger cache?

A: The Intel i7-14700T has 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB of L2 per core. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 8 MB of L3 and 1 MB of L2 per core. Intel's larger L3 likely contributes to its wins in data compression (38.1% ahead) and integer math (72.5% ahead).

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The Intel chip has a 35 W TDP, and the AMD chip has a 28 W TDP. The AMD part is more power-efficient on paper, but the Intel part delivers significantly higher performance in every recorded benchmark.

Q: Do both support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i7-14700T and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 list ECC memory support as true.

Q: Which has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel i7-14700T boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 boosts to 4.80 GHz. That 0.40 GHz gap helps explain Intel's single-thread edge.

The Verdict

The data is one-sided. The Intel Core i7-14700T wins every head-to-head benchmark, with an average score of 41914 versus 41208 for the AMD part. The biggest deltas are in multi-core and math-heavy workloads: 84.1% in floating point, 72.5% in integer math, 71.3% in encryption, and 73.9% in physics. If the workload is parallel, the Intel chip is the clear choice. The 20-core, 28-thread configuration with 33 MB of L3 cache is simply in a different class than the 6-core, 12-thread AMD part with 8 MB of L3.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 does have a notable strength: it is a mobile part with a 28 W TDP, designed for laptops, while the Intel chip is a 35 W desktop processor. For a user who needs a low-power mobile solution, the AMD part is the only option in this comparison. But in raw performance, there is no contest. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 4.80 GHz) and supports PCIe Gen 5, whereas AMD sticks with Gen 4. The Intel chip launched at $384 MSRP, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The verdict is straightforward: choose the Intel Core i7-14700T for any performance-sensitive desktop build, especially if the applications use multiple threads. Choose the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 only if the requirement is a mobile form factor with lower power draw, because the benchmark scores show it cannot keep up in compute-heavy tasks.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in almost every key specification. The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 1.30 GHz for Intel and 2.00 GHz for AMD, but boost clocks reverse the order: 5.20 GHz for Intel versus 4.80 GHz for AMD. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel with a 257 mm² die, the AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC with a 195 mm² die. TDP is 35 W for Intel and 28 W for AMD. Sockets are Intel Socket 1700 versus AMD Socket FP8.

Cache allocation is also distinct: Intel gives 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3, AMD gives 1 MB of L2 per core and only 8 MB of L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. Memory support: Intel handles DDR4 and DDR5, AMD handles DDR5 and LPDDR5X, both dual-channel. AMD lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; Intel does not have a recorded bandwidth figure. PCIe: Intel is Gen 5 with 16 lanes, AMD is Gen 4 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: Intel UHD Graphics 770 versus AMD Radeon 840M. Release dates are 2024-01-07 for Intel and 2026-01-04 for AMD. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384; the AMD part has none recorded. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700T wins in every recorded benchmark category. The largest wins are in find prime numbers (88.3% ahead), floating point math (84.1%), physics (73.9%), integer math (72.5%), and encryption (71.3%). These are the workloads that benefit most from the Intel part's 20 cores, 28 threads, and 33 MB of L3 cache. Data compression (38.1% ahead), multithread (45.2%), random string sorting (41.4%), and extended instructions (8.6%) also go to Intel. Even single-thread performance, where AMD's Zen 5 architecture is expected to be strong, goes to Intel by 3.2%.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 does not win a single head-to-head benchmark. Its only advantage is qualitative: it is a mobile processor with a lower TDP (28 W versus 35 W), a smaller die (195 mm² versus 257 mm²), and a more advanced process node (4 nm versus 10 nm). For a laptop user who prioritizes battery life and portability over compute performance, the AMD part is the only choice in this pairing, since the Intel chip is a desktop part. But for any task that involves rendering, compiling, simulation, encryption, or heavy math, the Intel Core i7-14700T is the superior processor according to the recorded data.