AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440
Core i5-14501TE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core i5-14501TE
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data contains benchmark results for only one of the two processors in this comparison. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a full PassMark test suite spanning eleven workloads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark entries in the database. Consequently, a direct numerical comparison between these two chips cannot be constructed from the available measurements. The AMD part's average benchmark score of 41,208 places it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database, a strong overall showing. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, which scores 41,215 (a delta of 0%), the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H at 41,263 (0.1% faster), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41,376 (0.4% faster), and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H at 40,967 (0.6% slower). These margins are all within roughly one percent, indicating that the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 performs in the same tier as those four processors despite their different architectures and market positions.
Within its own benchmark suite, the AMD processor shows distinct strengths across different workload types. The data compression test produced a score of 256,420, by far the highest raw number in its results. Encryption workloads yielded 12,418, extended instruction tests scored 18,456, and prime number finding returned 77. Floating point math reached 42,934, integer math scored 65,991, and the multithread test produced 21,054. Physics simulation scored 1,119, random string sorting scored 27,252, and single-thread performance measured 3,785 (recorded identically under two test name variants). These numbers indicate a processor that handles integer-heavy and compression tasks particularly well, while maintaining respectable single-thread performance for a mobile-oriented chip.
Because the Intel part lacks any recorded scores, the head-to-head section of the database shows zero wins for either processor. The data simply does not support a claim that one chip beats the other in any specific benchmark. What can be stated from the database is that the AMD processor's average score of 41,208 is measured and verified, while the Intel processor's average is listed as zero, which reflects missing data rather than actual performance. The percentile rankings reinforce this asymmetry: the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 sits at the 87th percentile, while the Core i5-14501TE sits at the 50th percentile, though the latter figure is derived from an empty benchmark set and carries no evidentiary weight.
Architecture Differences
The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen family (Raptor Lake Refresh). Intel fabricates it on a 10 nm process at its own foundry, with a die size of 215 mm². These process differences are substantial: the AMD chip uses a smaller node, which typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency, while the Intel chip uses a larger node that requires more die area to achieve similar functionality.
Both processors feature six cores and twelve threads, so the core count does not differentiate them. Clock speeds, however, do differ. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel chip therefore holds a nominal clock advantage at both the base and boost frequencies, though the architecture differences between Zen 5 and Raptor Lake mean that raw clock speeds do not directly translate into performance equivalence. The thermal design power also diverges: the AMD chip is rated at 28 W, while the Intel chip is rated at 45 W. This makes the AMD part a lower-power design, consistent with its mobile market segment, while the Intel part targets desktop systems with a higher power envelope.
Cache hierarchies differ in structure. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD chip and 1.25 MB per core on the Intel chip, giving Intel a modest per-core advantage. The L3 cache shows a larger discrepancy: the AMD processor has 8 MB total, while the Intel processor has 24 MB shared. This threefold difference in last-level cache could influence performance in cache-sensitive workloads, though the benchmark data for the Intel chip is absent, so no measured confirmation exists.
Memory support also separates the two. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs by generation: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), giving Intel a newer PCIe standard for attached devices. Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part uses the Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor uses an AMD Socket FP8, indicating a mobile platform, whereas the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop platform. The Intel chip was released on 2024-06-30, while the AMD chip has a later release date of 2026-01-04. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a supported feature for either.
Where Each One Wins
The available data permits conclusions only for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440. Its benchmark results show particular strength in data compression, where the score of 256,420 dwarfs its other recorded results. This suggests workloads involving compression, archiving, or data reduction would be a favorable use case. Integer math, at 65,991, and floating point math, at 42,934, both indicate solid general computational throughput. The multithread score of 21,054 reflects the six-core, twelve-thread configuration working in parallel. Single-thread performance of 3,785 indicates that lightly threaded applications, such as many productivity tools, would run competently. Encryption at 12,418 and extended instructions at 18,456 show moderate capability in security-related and SIMD-heavy tasks. Random string sorting at 27,252 and physics at 1,119 round out the suite, with physics being the lowest relative score and suggesting that simulation-heavy workloads are not this chip's strongest area.
For the Intel Core i5-14501TE, the database contains no benchmark results, so no wins can be attributed to it. The processor's specifications, however, indicate design priorities that differ from the AMD part. Its higher base and boost clocks, larger L3 cache, and support for DDR4 memory make it a distinct option for desktop builds, particularly those reusing existing DDR4 memory. The 45 W TDP suggests it is intended for systems that can accommodate higher power draw in exchange for higher clock speeds. The Gen 5 PCIe interface provides newer connectivity for storage and expansion cards. Without recorded scores, the database cannot substantiate any performance advantage for the Intel chip in any specific workload.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.
Q: Do both processors have the same number of cores and threads?
A: Yes, both have 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?
A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.
Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440?
A: The AMD processor has an average benchmark score of 41,208, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database.
Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14501TE have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No, the database contains no benchmark entries for the Intel Core i5-14501TE.
The Verdict
The database provides a complete performance profile for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and no performance profile for the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Any selection between these two processors must therefore rely on the measured data for the AMD part and the specification sheet for the Intel part. The AMD chip demonstrates through its benchmarks that it is a capable mobile processor, with an average score of 41,208 that places it in the 87th percentile and within one percent of several higher-tier rivals. Its 28 W TDP and 4 nm process indicate an efficiency-focused design, and its support for LPDDR5X memory suits thin-and-light mobile systems. The Intel chip, by contrast, offers higher clock speeds, a larger L3 cache, DDR4 compatibility, and a Gen 5 PCIe interface, but none of these features are validated by recorded benchmark results. The data supports choosing the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 for users who prioritize measured performance and lower power consumption in a mobile form factor. The Intel Core i5-14501TE remains an option for desktop builders seeking a six-core, twelve-thread processor with newer PCIe connectivity and DDR4 support, but the absence of benchmark scores means its performance cannot be quantified in this database.