AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the Intel Core i5-14501E. The Intel Core i5-14501E has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, and the head-to-head comparison table is empty. This means the quantitative comparison must rely on the AMD processor's own benchmark suite and its position within the broader CPU landscape.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 delivers a multi-thread score of 21,054 in the PassMark suite, a single-thread score of 3,785, and an average benchmark score of 41,208. Its percentile ranking places it at 87, meaning it outperforms 87 percent of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-14501E, by contrast, holds a percentile ranking of 50, which places it exactly at the midpoint of the database distribution. With no benchmark scores recorded for the Intel part, the database cannot produce a direct score-to-score comparison.

The AMD processor's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance tier. The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H averages 41,215, a delta of 0 percent relative to the AMD chip. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H averages 41,263, putting it 0.1 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X averages 41,376, 0.4 percent ahead. The Intel Core Ultra X7 358H averages 40,967, 0.6 percent behind. These deltas are all within one percent, indicating that the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 sits in a tightly packed performance band where small variations separate adjacent parts.

The absence of benchmarks for the Intel Core i5-14501E means that the database cannot confirm whether its performance would land above or below the AMD chip. The percentile gap, however, is stark: 87 versus 50. That gap suggests the AMD part is designed for a higher performance tier, but without recorded measurements on the Intel side, the database offers no direct evidence of a head-to-head margin.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 shows a clear advantage in every recorded benchmark category, though these scores exist only for the AMD part. The data compression score of 256,420 indicates strong throughput in compression workloads. The floating point math score of 42,934 and integer math score of 65,991 show robust arithmetic processing. The extended instructions score of 18,456 demonstrates capable SIMD and specialized instruction handling. The random string sorting score of 27,252, the data encryption score of 12,418, and the physics score of 1,119 round out a comprehensive set of measured workloads.

For the Intel Core i5-14501E, the database records no benchmark wins because no benchmarks exist. The wins count in the head-to-head table is zero for both parts, and the benchmark array for the Intel processor is empty. This means the Intel chip cannot be credited with any measured advantage in the database, nor can it be compared directly on any specific workload.

The use-case split must therefore be inferred from the specifications and the AMD part's measured scores. The AMD processor, with its mobile segment designation, is positioned for portable systems where its 28 watt TDP and integrated Radeon 840M graphics support lighter, efficiency-oriented workloads. The Intel processor, with its desktop segment designation and 65 watt TDP, is positioned for stationary systems that can accommodate higher power draw. The Intel chip also uses UHD Graphics 770, which is a different integrated graphics solution.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is built on Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core i5 Raptor Lake Refresh generation. These are not iterative differences; they represent separate design philosophies from each manufacturer.

The process nodes differ substantially. The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm process from Intel. This process gap typically influences power efficiency and transistor density, though the database does not list transistor counts for either part. The die sizes also differ: the AMD chip measures 195 mm², the Intel chip measures 215 mm².

Core and thread counts are identical at 6 cores and 12 threads each. The cache configurations, however, diverge. Both parts list 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: the AMD chip has 1 MB per core, while the Intel chip has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a larger gap: the AMD chip has 8 MB, while the Intel chip has 24 MB shared. This gives the Intel part a notable cache capacity advantage, which can affect workloads that benefit from larger on-die storage.

Clock speeds also differ. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Higher clocks on the Intel part suggest stronger single-thread potential, though the database has no benchmark scores to confirm this. The TDP gap is significant: the AMD chip uses 28 watts, the Intel chip uses 65 watts. This affects cooling requirements and power delivery in real systems.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it. Both parts support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part's Gen 5 support offers higher potential bandwidth for compatible devices.

Socket compatibility is entirely separate. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-oriented socket. The Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop-oriented socket. These are not interchangeable, and each processor is locked to its respective platform. The market segments confirm this split: the AMD part is designated Mobile, the Intel part is designated Desktop.

The integrated graphics also differ. The AMD chip uses Radeon 840M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores for either part. Release dates show the Intel chip launched earlier: 2024-06-30 versus 2026-01-04 for the AMD chip. Neither part has a multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not supported on either.

The Verdict

The database presents an incomplete comparison. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a full suite of benchmark scores, a percentile ranking of 87, and an average score of 41,208. The Intel Core i5-14501E has no benchmark scores, an average score of zero, and a percentile ranking of 50. Any verdict must acknowledge this asymmetry.

For users prioritizing measured performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the only part with recorded data supporting its position. Its 87th percentile ranking places it well above the midpoint, and its nearest rivals all sit within one percent of its average score, indicating consistent performance in its tier. The Intel Core i5-14501E, at the 50th percentile, would need benchmark scores to establish whether it can match or exceed the AMD part, but the database provides none.

The architecture differences favor the AMD chip on efficiency. The 4 nm process and 28 watt TDP give it a clear power advantage over the Intel chip's 10 nm process and 65 watt TDP. For mobile or compact systems where power draw and heat are constraints, the AMD part is the logical choice based on the recorded specifications. The Intel part's higher base and boost clocks, larger L3 cache, and Gen 5 PCIe support suggest it may offer advantages in single-threaded tasks and high-bandwidth PCIe workloads, but the database has no benchmark data to confirm these speculative benefits.

The platform choice is decisive. The AMD chip requires Socket FP8 and supports only DDR5 or LPDDR5X memory. The Intel chip requires Socket 1700 and supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Users with existing DDR4 memory or Socket 1700 motherboards would be constrained to the Intel part, while users building new mobile systems would likely choose the AMD part. The Intel chip's desktop segment and 65 watt TDP make it unsuitable for the same portable form factors as the AMD chip.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the better-documented, higher-performing processor in the database, with a strong percentile ranking and a power-efficient design. The Intel Core i5-14501E remains an unmeasured quantity, and its 50th percentile ranking provides no basis for claiming superiority. Until benchmark scores are recorded for the Intel part, the database supports the AMD processor as the more capable choice.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has an average benchmark score of 41,208. The Intel Core i5-14501E has an average benchmark score of zero because no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-14501E ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads. There is no difference in core or thread count.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 8 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 watts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 | Intel Core i5-14501E |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Series | null | Core 14th Gen |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | null |

| ECC Memory | true | true |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-06-30 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | false | false |

| Part Number | 100-000001866 | Q49HSRNJM |

| Average Benchmark Score | 41,208 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 87 | 50 |